Basic Physics Savvy Quiz

[peterchen]

Many of the questions aren't very clear - though considering they can be answered "true" or "false" helps a bit. I didn't fail on these trick questions, though :cool:

We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

[MidwestLimey]

Dalek Dave wrote:

And the household electrocution was because I pulled the Correctly Marked Fuse out of the Fusebox, unfortunately whilst it was a correctly marked fuse, it was in the Wrong slot.

Suddenly my paranoia with all things electrical is validated. I always check for a pd before touching anything, even if I was the one that flicked the trip/switch etc. Mr Paranoia has yet to be electrocuted, which is bloody amazing.

---

I'm largely language agnostic

---

After a while they all bug me :doh:

---

[Patrick Etc]

peterchen wrote:

trick questions

There are alot of them. I'd say this "Basic Physics Savvy Quiz" is more an exercise in how well you know the test writer so you know when they're using specific language and when they're not - e.g., more an exercise in how people interpret questions than an emphasis on the questions themselves. Some of the questions are hard to misinterpret. Other questions are designed to be. Nobody who was really trying to gauge your physics savvy would ask questions that way.

---

It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. - Albert Einstein

[J Dunlap]

92.5% - But I'm embarrassed that I answered false to "Under typical conditions, ice melts and water freezes at the same temperature." :-O

[Ennis Ray Lynch Jr]

82.5 and I got a D for DumbA** in college physics.

Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway

[J Dunlap]

Brady Kelly wrote:

"13) An astronaut orbits the Earth 500 miles above its surface. She appears to be weightless because there is virtually no gravitational force on her. X Your Answer: true" - She does appear to be weightless, where in fact she is not.

The part that's false is "there is virtually no gravitational force on her" - there is actually quite a bit of gravitational force on her, and if she wasn't moving in orbit, she would be falling to a fiery death. What we call "zero gravity" isn't really zero gravity.

[Steve Mayfield]

I thing you mean you have been shocked several times - electrocution [^] is the fatal form of being shocked by electricity.

Steve

[Steve Mayfield]

I thing you mean you have been shocked several times - electrocution [^] is the fatal form of being shocked by electricity. now this is weird...it double posted me...

Steve

[Bert delaVega]

80% with a couple of guesses right. Some of the questions were iffy and could be interpreted in other ways. Fun though and thanks for sharing!

[PIEBALDconsult]

Electrocution = Electric + Execution :-D http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/electrocution[^]

[Dalek Dave]

maybe your 'puter was electrocuted? :)

------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

[Ed Poore]

82.5% although I feel some questions were abgiuous. For example the one about the car's engine, what happens with a torque converter, turbo. Yes I'm being picky but most cars now-a-days have these so...

---

I doubt it. If it isn't intuitive then we need to fix it. - Chris Maunder

[Steve Mayfield]

more likely one of the hamsters in the server farm tripped ;)

Steve

[Chris Maunder]

97.5. Was tricked by the one question I should have got: clouds are water droplets, not vapour! :doh: (I count that as samantic cheating in an exam and demand a recount!)

cheers, Chris Maunder

CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

[supercat9]

The average velocity of a car that goes around a circular track depends upon one's reference frame. If one uses an gravitational/inertial reference frame, a car which makes an integral number of circuits in an integral number of 23h56m intervals will average roughly zero velocity relative to any other apparently-non-moving point on the planet. Since the circuits were driven over a two-hour interval, however, a vector from almost any reference point to the spot on the track where the car began/ended the exercise will have changed direction quite considerably (up to 30 degrees).

[supercat9]

I don't consider it semantic cheating, since the amount of N2 surrounding the water droplets is greater than the amount of water vapor there.

[enhzflep]

85% here, no google or cheating - test completed in 4 minutes. Basic errors and question misinterpretation. Hmm, maybe I have still got it.

[soap brain]

:cool:

[Johann Gerell]

80% :cool:

-- Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

[Rich Leyshon]

Same score (75%) - it's been a LOT of years since Physics classes. Agree with some of the other comments about semantics. When I was in school, the word "voltage" was synonymous with the term "Electromotive force" but this quiz states that voltage is NOT a force. A difference in electrical potential causing electrons to move is not a force whereas a difference in gravitational potential is? Come on. Also the stuff about cubic cm and mm is utter gobshite and relates to mis-use of terms in a particular field and has nothing to do with the SI system. Rich