Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. VBer can't understand LINQ

VBer can't understand LINQ

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharplinqcomalgorithmsquestion
27 Posts 16 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Not Active

    I agree that you should be able to read both. As for using them both, you should also, however, I've found I'm more proficient in C#


    only two letters away from being an asset

    K Offline
    K Offline
    keyboard warrior
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Mark Nischalke wrote:

    I've found I'm more proficient in C#

    i agree. i have been able to hack into alien computers i never could have with VB. ;P hopefully you read the article a few posts up before you read this...

    ----------------------------------------------------------- "When I first saw it, I just thought that you really, really enjoyed programming in java." - Leslie Sanford

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Not Active

      Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


      only two letters away from being an asset

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Conrad
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Mark Nischalke wrote:

      the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved

      He needs to be introduced to Lisp and all the ( ) then :rolleyes:

      "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Not Active

        Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


        only two letters away from being an asset

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Scorch
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        He should try C;; err...++ then ;P

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Not Active

          Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


          only two letters away from being an asset

          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Mark Nischalke wrote:

          Not being hard on VB.

          You're right, I didn't pay close enough attention before opening my big mouth.

          “Cannot find REALITY.SYS...Universe Halted.” ~ God on phone with Microsoft Customer Support

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Sam Rahimi

            C# seems scary if you come from VBLand, like I did... I used it for about a month, no joke, and was writing code faster than I did in VB... I'd advise everyone to switch over. In my personal, biased opinion :)

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Sam Rahimi wrote:

            I'd advise everyone to switch over. In my personal, biased opinion

            I go back and forth without much of a hiccup. I've found that because VB is more verbose, it's easier to maintain which is a point in its favor IMHO, but usually its the shop that decides not the hired gun. Unless one wants and has long-term job security, not being able to write both is, again imho, like a man with one leg trying to ride a bike.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M MidwestLimey

              I still find it scary ".net developers" can't do both.


              I'm largely language agnostic


              After a while they all bug me :doh:


              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stuart Dootson
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              MidwestLimey wrote:

              I still find it scary ".net developers" can't won't do both.

              That covers the C# developers :)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Not Active

                I was searching around for books and checking the comments and found this one to be humorous. "It would be nice to have an author approach LINQ from a VB programming point. I really don't want to have to rewrite everything into C# just because no one seems to want to publish a book on LINQ using VB." http://www.amazon.com/review/R1MZ6Z4KBFP5BV/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0735624003&nodeID=283155#wasThisHelpful[^]


                only two letters away from being an asset

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Roger Wright
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                I find this humorous because, every time I try to find a solution on MSDN for a C# project, it returns a VB example as a response.

                "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups