Something good to see
-
Are you suggesting it's not an issue within the country? Or the world? I see that you are not disputing that anti-muslim bigotry is a problem within the Democratic party. Or with the Independent party for that matter. Let's not make believe that Republicans have a monopoly on bigotry. :rolleyes: Good Lord, if being blonde was somehow a bad thing you'd probably be pointing out statistics of Republican blondes. Keeping with the partisan schtick I see. You're really Bill Mahr, aren't you. You can tell me, I want tell anybody.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
You can tell me, I want tell anybody.
Freudian slip?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Just plain old garden variety sarcasm.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Are they?
Yes It's the notion that it isn't possible for Obama to lose on the issues. If he does lose, then the only possible explanation is racism.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read
This is what you are whining about? Not that Obama is playing the race card, but that some pundit is? Now slate is the Democratic party? Sorry I'm not buying into Stan's(and now your) fantasy of a 'leftist' media as an organ of the Democratic party.
-
When you have something to say to me, rather than some strawman, I will be happy to respond.
Then go ahead, I'm waiting with bated breathe. You posed the stupid question, as if it means something to admit that there is bigotry in the Republican party, as if there isn't in any other organization. Strawman indeed, I may have to start calling you that.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
This is what you are whining about? Not that Obama is playing the race card, but that some pundit is? Now slate is the Democratic party? Sorry I'm not buying into Stan's(and now your) fantasy of a 'leftist' media as an organ of the Democratic party.
oilFactotum wrote:
Not that Obama is playing the race card, but that some pundit is?
Sounds like blaiming McCain for what somebody in a crowd yells, huh.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Then go ahead, I'm waiting with bated breathe. You posed the stupid question, as if it means something to admit that there is bigotry in the Republican party, as if there isn't in any other organization. Strawman indeed, I may have to start calling you that.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
I'm still waiting, because, quite frankly, I have no idea what you are trying to say in this post.
-
maybe you should take a trip to the local food bank where the "poor" can get free foodstuff. Check out the parking lot and see what they're driving. And go inside and see what they're wearing, and tell me that all of them are "hurting". I have done so and not everyone I see is "hurting".
John P.
jparken wrote:
I have done so and not everyone I see is "hurting".
From your phrasing, can I assume that some must be? My kids and I used to spend Thanksgiving mornings delivering Turkey dinners to shut-ins. They were hurting
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
I'm still waiting, because, quite frankly, I have no idea what you are trying to say in this post.
oilFactotum wrote:
I see that you are not disputing that anti-muslim bigotry is a problem within the Repbublican party
Exactly what response did you expect that to elicit? And what do you imagine that response would prove?
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Even within your own party
Apparently not. Obama got the nomination. I see that you are not disputing that anti-muslim bigotry is a problem within the Repbublican party.
Yes, but they did not nominate hillary, so clearly, they are sexist...
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
All I know is that it is a damn good thing for you that Barack is black. No white guy that far to the left would have ever made it this far. Otherwise, oily, you would have been president a long time ago.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Even within your own party
Apparently not. Obama got the nomination. I see that you are not disputing that anti-muslim bigotry is a problem within the Repbublican party.
oilFactotum wrote:
Apparently not. Obama got the nomination.
Logcally that does not follow. Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards black people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary", that would be a different matter. But that would have taken some of the spin off, and spin was your whole purpose wasn't it? For somebody who claims to dislike Fox News, you sure do stick to the Hannity & Colmes playbook.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
This is what you are whining about? Not that Obama is playing the race card, but that some pundit is? Now slate is the Democratic party? Sorry I'm not buying into Stan's(and now your) fantasy of a 'leftist' media as an organ of the Democratic party.
oilFactotum wrote:
'leftist' media as an organ of the Democratic party
Not so much an organ, as a tool. By all means, keep wearing your blinders.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Apparently not. Obama got the nomination.
Logcally that does not follow. Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards black people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary", that would be a different matter. But that would have taken some of the spin off, and spin was your whole purpose wasn't it? For somebody who claims to dislike Fox News, you sure do stick to the Hannity & Colmes playbook.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
you sure do stick to the Hannity & Colmes playbook
ROFL. He does doedsn't he.? I'll never read another one of Oily's posts without thinking of dweebish Alan reading it in his effete voice.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
BoneSoft wrote:
you sure do stick to the Hannity & Colmes playbook
ROFL. He does doedsn't he.? I'll never read another one of Oily's posts without thinking of dweebish Alan reading it in his effete voice.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Hannity and Colmes both do the same thing, try to get people to concede on some silly statement that they think will validate their whole premise. Oily to a T.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Apparently not. Obama got the nomination.
Logcally that does not follow. Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards black people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary", that would be a different matter. But that would have taken some of the spin off, and spin was your whole purpose wasn't it? For somebody who claims to dislike Fox News, you sure do stick to the Hannity & Colmes playbook.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
Logcally that does not follow.
Well, yes it does. You appear to be incapable of following this conversation into which you have chosen to insert yourself. Go back to the top[^]
BoneSoft wrote:
Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards black people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary",
And why would I have said that? We were talking about anti-muslim bigotry, not racism against blacks. Besides that, it's obvious that the crypto-muslim falsehood did not take root in the Democratic party, this is a narrative of the right - and McCain plays into it.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
'leftist' media as an organ of the Democratic party
Not so much an organ, as a tool. By all means, keep wearing your blinders.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Not so much an organ, as a tool.
By all means, continue to live in your fantasy world, and whine about how victimized the poor conservative are.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Not that Obama is playing the race card, but that some pundit is?
Sounds like blaiming McCain for what somebody in a crowd yells, huh.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
Sounds like blaiming McCain for what somebody in a crowd yells, huh.
No, not at all. I don't see the two as comparable. Rather that elaborate as to why, I'll let you jump to some more false conclusions - you're so good at that.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Logcally that does not follow.
Well, yes it does. You appear to be incapable of following this conversation into which you have chosen to insert yourself. Go back to the top[^]
BoneSoft wrote:
Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards black people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary",
And why would I have said that? We were talking about anti-muslim bigotry, not racism against blacks. Besides that, it's obvious that the crypto-muslim falsehood did not take root in the Democratic party, this is a narrative of the right - and McCain plays into it.
oilFactotum wrote:
Well, yes it does.
Well, no it does not. Now you're just being obtuse.
oilFactotum wrote:
You appear to be incapable of... blah blah blah
Ad hominem, ad nauseum.
oilFactotum wrote:
We were talking about anti-muslim bigotry
Ah right, forgive me... [correction] Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards muslim people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary" [/correction] Statement still stands. But by all means, continue with your original ad absurdum, or renew your ad hominem if you must.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
I see that you are not disputing that anti-muslim bigotry is a problem within the Repbublican party
Exactly what response did you expect that to elicit? And what do you imagine that response would prove?
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
Exactly what response did you expect that to elicit?
I was making the point that he didn't respond directly to my previous post. Instead he simply accused the other side of the same problem. That form of attack response automatically concedes that the original point is valid.
BoneSoft wrote:
And what do you imagine that response would prove?
Prove? Don't know what you mean by that.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Well, yes it does.
Well, no it does not. Now you're just being obtuse.
oilFactotum wrote:
You appear to be incapable of... blah blah blah
Ad hominem, ad nauseum.
oilFactotum wrote:
We were talking about anti-muslim bigotry
Ah right, forgive me... [correction] Now if you had said "Apparently less than 50% of the party is not bigoted towards muslim people specifically, or at least not bigoted enough to outweigh their dislike for Hillary" [/correction] Statement still stands. But by all means, continue with your original ad absurdum, or renew your ad hominem if you must.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
Well, no it does not.
You have yet to actually support that there is anything illogical. The 'Apparently not' statement was not said in a vacuum.
BoneSoft wrote:
[correction]
I have already responded to your correction in the previous post. Simply restating yourself advances nothing.