Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Sunburn:Son't believe everything you hear

Sunburn:Son't believe everything you hear

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmldatabasecomquestion
22 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Richard Stringer

    Ryan Johnston wrote: She was in jail for 8 days already? I think that is more than sufficient punishment for her neglect (especially since the burns only turned out to be first degree burns). I still think it was stupid for her to have had her kids (at such a young age) without sun screen There is NO law requiring the use of sunscreen. Possibly she could not even afford sunscreen - we don't know the circumstances. I live in Texas and don't use the stuff. The point is, or the point should be, when did it become aginst the law to be stupid. I am sure that the larger part of the population and more than a few from this forum would be incarcerated if this was true. If I were her I would have an attorney sueing the bejabbers out of the country bumkin cop and anyone else involved. Ryan Johnston wrote: I sure did. I grew up in a desert. I got plenty of sun burns growing up. And did your mother go to jail ? I doubt it. I am just fed up to the gills with this Zero Tolerance crapola and wannabe district attorneys and self serving cops that think a gun and a badge make them arbitrators of justice. Hell if they had any sense they would be in another occupation anyway. :) Richard Between believing a thing and thinking you know is only a small step and quickly taken. Mark Twain- 3,000 Years Among the Microbes

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Richard Stringer wrote: There is NO law requiring the use of sunscreen. Possibly she could not even afford sunscreen - we don't know the circumstances.....The point is, or the point should be, when did it become aginst the law to be stupid. That's right, and why is it a crime to leave your kids locked up in closed car on a hot day. Richard Stringer wrote: I live in Texas and don't use the stuff. Great point. Your being stupid and hurting yourself. She's being stupid and hurting her kids who don't know better and can't do anything about it. Richard Stringer wrote: If I were her I would have an attorney sueing the bejabbers out of the country bumkin cop and anyone else involved. Yeehaaa. I'm stupid and the constitution gives me the right to be stupid and make you pay for it. Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D David Wulff

      Shog9 wrote: Hmm, neither memory nor Lounge involvement stretch back that far. But it sounds an ugly can 'o worms, so i'll let it be... It wasn't that bad, it was more along the lines of having all children neutered at birth using a temporary method (i.e. can be reversed if they ever want to have children). Easily the vast majority of babies are not planed, so this would not only help the 'parents' but also cut down on the number of children who should not be here (ones that are not wanted and are never loved completely) who usually end up entering into society from the wrong end and with a twisted perspective. Win-win for everyone. Shog9 wrote: Fair 'nuff !! David is being pathetic pedantic alert !! The ' in 'nuff is indicating a missing character, the 'e', so do you spell enough enuff?


      David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk

      I'm not schizophrenic, are we.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Shog9 0
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      David Wulff wrote: The ' in 'nuff is indicating a missing character, the 'e', so do you spell enough enuff? *shog glares at the screen through blood-shot eyes.* No. I spell 'nuff "'nuff", and enough "enough", and wouldn't for the life of me spell "enuff". What were you thinking?

      ---

      Shog9 Actually I use to find learning in bars when drinking really useful. It sort of makes a language liquid. - Colin Davies, Thinking in English?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups