Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Socialist America

Socialist America

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharphtmlcomai-codingtools
26 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Synaptrik

    which are derived from wages

    This statement is false

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Gaskey
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Synaptrik wrote:

    which are derived from wages

    which are paid by people that control the supply, the "rich" (read that as business owners).

    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mike Gaskey

      Synaptrik wrote:

      which are derived from wages

      which are paid by people that control the supply, the "rich" (read that as business owners).

      Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Synaptrik
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Which returns right back as a direct result of consuming. Henry Ford had to deal with recession in his day and his solution was to give all of his employees raises and ecourage them to by Ford vehicles. It worked. That increase in wages led right back into his economy. He got it.

      This statement is false

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Synaptrik

        Which returns right back as a direct result of consuming. Henry Ford had to deal with recession in his day and his solution was to give all of his employees raises and ecourage them to by Ford vehicles. It worked. That increase in wages led right back into his economy. He got it.

        This statement is false

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mike Gaskey
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        okay, you do understand. realize though that the supply, money aka wages, came from private industry.

        Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Synaptrik

          Sorry, too lengthy to read. I was merely being facetious and can't consume serious replies.

          This statement is false

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          Synaptrik wrote:

          I was merely being facetious and can't consume serious replies

          Damn. I am such a sucker. Every time someone writes, 'I think," I take them at their word. :-O

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mike Gaskey

            okay, you do understand. realize though that the supply, money aka wages, came from private industry.

            Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Synaptrik
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Tis a vicious cycle. ;) The supply of goods is meaningless without wages with which to purchase. Supply side doesn't quite work as a theory due to the codependency upon wages.

            This statement is false

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Synaptrik wrote:

              I was merely being facetious and can't consume serious replies

              Damn. I am such a sucker. Every time someone writes, 'I think," I take them at their word. :-O

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Synaptrik
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              Oakman wrote:

              Every time someone writes, 'I think,"

              Ahhh... I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference.

              This statement is false

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Synaptrik

                Oakman wrote:

                Every time someone writes, 'I think,"

                Ahhh... I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference.

                This statement is false

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Synaptrik wrote:

                I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference

                I'll try to remember that you no longer think. Thanks for clearing that up.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Synaptrik wrote:

                  I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference

                  I'll try to remember that you no longer think. Thanks for clearing that up.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Synaptrik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Whatever helps you sleep at night! :laugh: A small piece of advise that you are more than free to ignore. By adjusting your slant towards insult you might find a more intellectual discourse. It could be that you are stifling potential before it buds. Or rather you determine the playing field and game by your choice to insult. ... *awaiting the next laughable attempt at insult*

                  This statement is false

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Synaptrik

                    Whatever helps you sleep at night! :laugh: A small piece of advise that you are more than free to ignore. By adjusting your slant towards insult you might find a more intellectual discourse. It could be that you are stifling potential before it buds. Or rather you determine the playing field and game by your choice to insult. ... *awaiting the next laughable attempt at insult*

                    This statement is false

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Synaptrik wrote:

                    you might find a more intellectual discourse

                    Lemme see. I spent 15 minutes writing a short, but fairly cogent explanation of why the medium of exchange is no longer a force for stability and you reply "duh, it's too long to read." And now you're advising me on how to have a conversation on a higher level? ROFL! The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you. Thank goodness for Diego's script. Plonk.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Synaptrik wrote:

                      you might find a more intellectual discourse

                      Lemme see. I spent 15 minutes writing a short, but fairly cogent explanation of why the medium of exchange is no longer a force for stability and you reply "duh, it's too long to read." And now you're advising me on how to have a conversation on a higher level? ROFL! The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you. Thank goodness for Diego's script. Plonk.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Oakman wrote:

                      The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you.

                      And this is the best news I've heard of late. Thanks, I hope you have the temerity to follow through. But I seriously doubt your trollish tendencies will allow that.

                      This statement is false

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups