Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Now she's pissed!

Now she's pissed!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomhelpannouncement
30 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Ilion

    Chris Austin wrote:

    So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me. :)

    Please! You're not stupid. And it's near impossible to believe that you so ignorant about what hase been going on for at least 50 years that you simply can't see the falsity of what you've said. There is only one other option to explain why you'd say this false thing.

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Ilíon wrote: There is only one other option to explain why you'd say this. Absolutely. He just doesn't understand that sauce for the gander is not sauce for the goose. You tell him!

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      Chris Austin wrote:

      So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me. :)

      Please! You're not stupid. And it's near impossible to believe that you so ignorant about what hase been going on for at least 50 years that you simply can't see the falsity of what you've said. There is only one other option to explain why you'd say this false thing.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Austin
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Ilíon wrote:

      And it's near impossible to believe that you so ignorant about what hase been going on for at least 50

      You mean the federal government becoming more and more involved with the daily lives of it's citizens? Or, do you mean the republican and democratic party abandoning all sense of the rule of law? Or, do you mean bills being passed in congress and signed by the president that are the equivalent of a Rube Goldberg machine in writing? Or, do you mean the complete loss of level headiness by the electorate as the country seems like it is on a course to continually swing from one extreme of leadership to the other and people outsource their thinking to talking heads on radio and TV? Or, is it the complete lack of long term thinking in this country that you are referring to? Because there has been a lot of bs happening during my lifetime and I really want nothing to do with it.

      Ilíon wrote:

      You're not stupid.

      Maybe I am. But, I never want to be the smartest person in the room.

      Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Chris Austin wrote: Yeah, and then they talk about leaving the union because uncle sugar has gone too far. But that was about taxes, this is about protecting the world from the possibility that the Sooners and the Warriors will play for a national championship without a chance for the Aggies' alumni to get into drunken brawls in the stadium parking lot. God God, man, have you no sense of priorities???

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Austin
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Oakman wrote:

        But that was about taxes, this is about protecting the world from the possibility that the Sooners and the Warriors will

        HAHA... Texas and their football mythology. The entire state is still feeling insecure that if you count all of the national championships from all of the football teams they still don't come close to po dunk Oklahoma and Nebraska.

        Oakman wrote:

        God God, man, have you no sense of priorities???

        I'll have to work on it. Boomer!

        Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Austin

          I am too cynical to believe that she and her group are in the capitol and will not be lobbying congress. Are you willing to take odds that it wont happen?

          Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Synaptrik
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          *I hear crickets*

          This statement is false

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Brady Kelly

            New York - The reigning Miss California has gone to Washington to help launch a campaign opposing same-sex marriage. [^]

            You really gotta try harder to keep up with everyone that's not on the short bus with you. - John Simmons / outlaw programmer.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Christian Graus
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Well, it's obviously retarded ( she's DEFENDING marriage ? How about defending it from a 50% divorce rate ? ).

            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Austin

              So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me. :)

              Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Chris Austin wrote:

              So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me

              Were you equally upset when the federal government destroyed states rights on issues such as abortion, sodomy and flag burning?

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O C 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Chris Austin wrote:

                So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me

                Were you equally upset when the federal government destroyed states rights on issues such as abortion, sodomy and flag burning?

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Stan Shannon wrote: Were you equally upset when the federal government destroyed states rights on issues such as abortion, sodomy and flag burning? You forgot slavery and later miscegenation

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote: Were you equally upset when the federal government destroyed states rights on issues such as abortion, sodomy and flag burning? You forgot slavery and later miscegenation

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Oakman wrote:

                  You forgot slavery and later miscegenation

                  Slavery was ended by amending the constitution, which is entirely appropriate. But you are correct to point out that I omitted miscegenation.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Chris Austin wrote:

                    So she's into the 'our country' thing but doesn't agree with our founding fathers that these things should be handled at the local level. She wants it to be dictated from on high by a central government? Sounds like a typical liberal to me

                    Were you equally upset when the federal government destroyed states rights on issues such as abortion, sodomy and flag burning?

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris Austin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Of course. I am not being selective about issues here. In fact, I don't even think the government should be involved in the definition of a marriage since it is traditionally a religious institution. But I think the results should stand. Heck, even with something like health care I prefer to see it decided by the states.

                    Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Austin

                      Of course. I am not being selective about issues here. In fact, I don't even think the government should be involved in the definition of a marriage since it is traditionally a religious institution. But I think the results should stand. Heck, even with something like health care I prefer to see it decided by the states.

                      Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Cool. Me too.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups