FoxIt Reader [modified]
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
No problem here. Works perfectly on Win7, always has.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
Douglas Troy wrote:
You running IE8 or something?
No. I'm using Fx 3.5 RC 2 at the moment, but the problem was also with version 3.0.11. Ironically, IE7 had no problem with the pages
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
I found this similar issue posted on their tech boards: http://forums.foxitsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=14241&highlight=FoxitReaderOCX.ocx[^] Basically says: Reinstall, that should fix it ...
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
I found this similar issue posted on their tech boards: http://forums.foxitsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=14241&highlight=FoxitReaderOCX.ocx[^] Basically says: Reinstall, that should fix it ...
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLThat's very interesting. I got the exact same undefined error when updating, and that's what caused the problem. It's odd that I was one of the only people to get it though - perhaps it was a blue moon
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
-
Dunno but the website says "Foxit Reader supports Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista." so maybe just download and install it?
It made that claim 6 mo ago, but was somewhat buggy. I was wondering if anyone who installed it more recently knew it they fixed it...
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
-
That happened too. I think I'm the only person here who prefers Adobe Reader. Then again, spending a few hours trying to manually remove as much as possible of that stupid program does usually have that effect
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
I prefer adobe reader for very large tech manuals. It's search sidebar with context information around every hit is much easier than a modal find dialog with next/preb buttons. For smaller documents foxit's faster loading time is much preferred. Neither is permitted to blight my browsers as a plugin.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
The only complaint I have about Foxit, is that it nags me to download, usually non free, add ons, rather too frequently.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
The thing I hate most about it is its horrible font rendering though. So bad that I even complained to them. Geez what a joke. It makes most of the text look purple with "Clear"Type enabled and it makes all the text look bold when it's disabled. Actually not just bold, but bold with crappy artifacts. I have not yet decided what's worse - the purple or the bold+artifacts. Both are very bad. Reminds me of WPF's font rendering. How about actually clear font rendering instead of BlurryRainbowType(tm) that passes for "cleartype"? Is it too much to ask? It should in fact be easier to implement. Yea ok, that was a rant, sorry ;P
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
Knowing Adobe, I wouldn't be surprised if they included something in their recent acrobat reader installations that sabotaged FoxIt. Dig into your registry, and look at the settings that Adobe puts in there (of course, you'll have to do it logged on as an administrator, and change the permissions for the Adobe entries -- they seem to believe that they have the right to deny you permission to view whole chunks of your registry). Like everyone else, I've never had a problem with Foxit -- and the sheer joy of seeing an 800-page PDF open in about a second, then not stall when I try to do such foolish things as scroll past graphics, is wonderful. What makes me laugh is that the full version of Acrobat, which I have to use, requires more disc space than MS Word, but it can't even create a file. I remember I used to carry around two separate postscript interpreters on a single floppy disc; Acrobat needs a DVD.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Judging by the results Google found, no-one else has. I couldn't find the correct solution anywhere
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
People don't post real problems. It's the schadenfreude of knowing nobody can Google it because you couldn't. That's why there are so few articles on ASP.NET data binding that don't use the built in collection based binding.
rules
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
I read CodeProject forums a lot... and I hardly ever, ever comment. But this just struck a chord with me. I am one of the proctors at a set of computer labs. There are three labs, each with about 20-30 computers in them. During a recent re-imaging of the labs, one of our supervisors decided to replace Adobe Reader with Foxit Reader. Then all hello broke loose. Certain PDF documents were declared by Foxit to be "corrupt" even when they would open in Adobe just fine. This seemed to be related to professors that put large images into their lecture slides. It's kind of difficult to run a computer lab that most students use for printing lecture slides without them being able to open their lecture slides! And then the network started having issues, to where we couldn't sustain a multi-gigabyte data transfer to reimage the workstations. Without the nuclear option, we had to resort to manually uninstalling Foxit on all the computers. It left behind plugins, ActiveX objects, and the like, and I kid you not, months after the 'foxit incident' I still had students coming up to me with PDF problems - caused by Foxit! I know many people have had good luck with it - obviously the sup that decided to install it had good luck. Why else would he have suggested it? But those stories ARE out there!
-
There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
Been using FoxIt for years now, never had real troubles. Sometime,s display quality and typographic alignment doesn't match the quality of Adobe, but the latter has given me much more browser plugin problems in a month than FoxIt did in all the time I use it.
Don't attribute to stupidity what can be equally well explained by buerocracy.
My latest article | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist