France exit
-
Very sad....France is one of my favorite foot ball team along with Argentina.
thatraja
thatraja wrote:
Very sad....France is one of my favorite foot ball team along with Argentina.
So says someone who just doesn't 'get' football. 1. It's not sad it's France. 2. You don't have a favourite team you support your country (however bad they are) 3. It's not possible to have two 'favourites' unless one is a club side and the other is a country. :)
-
thatraja wrote:
Very sad....France is one of my favorite foot ball team along with Argentina.
So says someone who just doesn't 'get' football. 1. It's not sad it's France. 2. You don't have a favourite team you support your country (however bad they are) 3. It's not possible to have two 'favourites' unless one is a club side and the other is a country. :)
1, true 2,what if is mum is french his dad argentinian and he was born in spain? 3,see above
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
-
1, true 2,what if is mum is french his dad argentinian and he was born in spain? 3,see above
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
-
http://sports.rediff.com/report/2010/jun/22/football-world-cup-2010-match-report-france-vs-south-africa.htm[^] :sigh: :sigh:
WWW, WCF, WWF, WPF, WFC .... WTF
YES! YES! YES! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: They didn't deserve Ireland's place in the finals anyway. They didn't win a single match in the groups stage. Ireland should have been there, we may not have performed any better, but we should have been there.
Pete
-
YES! YES! YES! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: They didn't deserve Ireland's place in the finals anyway. They didn't win a single match in the groups stage. Ireland should have been there, we may not have performed any better, but we should have been there.
Pete
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Ireland should have been there, we may not have preformed any better, but we should have been there.
You missed one fact: Ireland did not even got close to be dangerous in their game against France. OK, Henry cheated, but to win, Ireland would also have had to score, which, IMHO, was not the easiest for them to do. So please stop with this "we should have been there". If this were the case, you would have qualified yourself earlier.
-
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Ireland should have been there, we may not have preformed any better, but we should have been there.
You missed one fact: Ireland did not even got close to be dangerous in their game against France. OK, Henry cheated, but to win, Ireland would also have had to score, which, IMHO, was not the easiest for them to do. So please stop with this "we should have been there". If this were the case, you would have qualified yourself earlier.
Maybe so, but i'm going to gloat anyway Ha! :laugh:
Pete
-
Maybe so, but i'm going to gloat anyway Ha! :laugh:
Pete
-
But i'm from India. Those teams are just my favorites in football. So i didn't relate to any of those country. In cricket, South Africa is my favorite. :)
thatraja
-
Let's see, the US plays the team with the worst goal differential in the group, while England plays the team with the best goal differential in the group - what do you think the odds are that England will win, and the US lose?
Well, the US didn't lose. However, neither did the English. Though no one is too complimentary about their play so far, they have yet to lose a game and they are going on the next round. Unlike the French. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]