Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Since the day approaches... [modified]

Since the day approaches... [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
question
32 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F fjdiewornncalwe

    Religious nuts who still believe this stuff is my guess.

    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

    F Offline
    F Offline
    fjdiewornncalwe
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Apparently the religious minded univoter has struck, but is too cowardly to admit it...

    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F fjdiewornncalwe

      Apparently the religious minded univoter has struck, but is too cowardly to admit it...

      I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      I really can't accept the nativity as described in Luke and Mathew as anything other than a nice tale with little or no verifiable facts in it. (Though it's responsible for some rather beautiful music.) At the same time, I see no need to run around insulting people who, for one reason or another, believe it to be true. Kind of like telling a parent that his kid is ugly. It serves no purpose but to hurt feelings.

      "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F fjdiewornncalwe

        Remember... These are the same fools who thought genetic engineering included having a striped goat result from goats mating beside a striped tree... (Genesis Chapter 30 for those who are curious)

        I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

        modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:59 PM

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        Is that any different from what a lot of cultures were coming up with in their first fumblings at trying to arrive at cause and effect? To call someone a fool for attempting to come up with an explanation and arriving at one that, while wrong, was still being promulgated by scientists in the USSR in the 1930's - without any belief in a supreme being attached to it - seems a bit misguided. By the way, I countered the unibomber. Your post in no longer rated as unfit for discriminating readers. ;)

        "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          Would an angel emit "man fat"? Or "Angel fat" which could be anything. It is a misnomer to refer to ejaculate as "man fat" BTW. Typically, semen (one average ejaculate, approximately one teaspoon) contains : 150 mg of protein, 11 mg of carbohydrates, 6 mg fat, 3 mg cholesterol, 7% US RDA potassium and 3% US RDA copper and zinc. There are trace amounts of several vitamins in a regular, healthy, ejaculation-full of semen. In fact, the amount of vitamin C is about the same as in an orange. Very low fat content: may I suggest you try the term "man protein" instead?

          Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Essential Ingredient[^]

          Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.

          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Essential Ingredient[^]

            Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.

            OriginalGriffO Offline
            OriginalGriffO Offline
            OriginalGriff
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            I am SO not coming round for dinner at your place...:~

            Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
            "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

            O 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

              I am SO not coming round for dinner at your place...:~

              Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              Don't ask, he might tell.

              "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                I really can't accept the nativity as described in Luke and Mathew as anything other than a nice tale with little or no verifiable facts in it. (Though it's responsible for some rather beautiful music.) At the same time, I see no need to run around insulting people who, for one reason or another, believe it to be true. Kind of like telling a parent that his kid is ugly. It serves no purpose but to hurt feelings.

                "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                But then it's easy to insult Christians, they only turn the other cheek.

                Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  But then it's easy to insult Christians, they only turn the other cheek.

                  Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fjdiewornncalwe
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  But it has never been fully clarified which cheeks they are turning in your direction.

                  I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                  O L 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • F fjdiewornncalwe

                    But it has never been fully clarified which cheeks they are turning in your direction.

                    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    Don't Ask, Don't Tell

                    "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F fjdiewornncalwe

                      But it has never been fully clarified which cheeks they are turning in your direction.

                      I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Think of our celestial satellite.

                      Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                        Would an angel emit "man fat"? Or "Angel fat" which could be anything. It is a misnomer to refer to ejaculate as "man fat" BTW. Typically, semen (one average ejaculate, approximately one teaspoon) contains : 150 mg of protein, 11 mg of carbohydrates, 6 mg fat, 3 mg cholesterol, 7% US RDA potassium and 3% US RDA copper and zinc. There are trace amounts of several vitamins in a regular, healthy, ejaculation-full of semen. In fact, the amount of vitamin C is about the same as in an orange. Very low fat content: may I suggest you try the term "man protein" instead?

                        Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        David C Hobbyist
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        :laugh: ROFLMAO Nice use of too mant detail's

                        If I look confused It is because I am!!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups