Another b*stard trying to save his *ss
-
KaЯl wrote: he was just trying to make a f*cking fascist 100 year old man laugh. :wtf: How do you know he's a fascist?! The man ran for president in 1948! People can change. Sen. Thurmond renounced his segregationist views years ago. BTW, our great democratic senators have a "Black Caucus" which is segregation. KaЯl wrote: And he's still in place ? Yes. KaЯl wrote: is KKK recognized as a terrorist organisation ? I doubt it. KaЯl wrote: the dreaded "N" word n*gger X|
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *Jason Henderson wrote: How do you know he's a fascist?! I assimilate segregationism to facism. Jason Henderson wrote: The man ran for president in 1948! People can change. And you are for Death Penalty :laugh: (you deny this capacity of remission to a convicted but not to a politician :)) Jason Henderson wrote: I doubt it. Why not? It uses terror to achieve political targets, doesn't it ? Jason Henderson wrote: the dreaded "N" word I thought it was "Nazi" :-O
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
-
KaЯl wrote: he was just trying to make a f*cking fascist 100 year old man laugh. :wtf: How do you know he's a fascist?! The man ran for president in 1948! People can change. Sen. Thurmond renounced his segregationist views years ago. BTW, our great democratic senators have a "Black Caucus" which is segregation. KaЯl wrote: And he's still in place ? Yes. KaЯl wrote: is KKK recognized as a terrorist organisation ? I doubt it. KaЯl wrote: the dreaded "N" word n*gger X|
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *Jason Henderson wrote: Sen. Thurmond renounced his segregationist views years ago. for that matter, so did Byrd, so you can drop that example. -c
-
Jason Henderson wrote: How do you know he's a fascist?! I assimilate segregationism to facism. Jason Henderson wrote: The man ran for president in 1948! People can change. And you are for Death Penalty :laugh: (you deny this capacity of remission to a convicted but not to a politician :)) Jason Henderson wrote: I doubt it. Why not? It uses terror to achieve political targets, doesn't it ? Jason Henderson wrote: the dreaded "N" word I thought it was "Nazi" :-O
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
KaЯl wrote: And you are for Death Penalty (you deny this capacity of remission to a convicted but not to a politician ) :omg: Murder is a lot different than being a former segregationist. KaЯl wrote: Why not? It uses terror to achieve political targets, doesn't it ? I htink they are a recognized organization with the same free speech rights as everyone else. Now if they start lynching people, I suspect we'll see them on the terrorist list.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
Jason Henderson wrote: Sen. Thurmond renounced his segregationist views years ago. for that matter, so did Byrd, so you can drop that example. -c
But Byrd used the N word just a couple of years ago. By using the same level of thinking the democrats are using against Lott, we can say that Byrd is a racist.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
Jason Henderson wrote: when he was just trying to make a 100 year old man laugh he was just trying to make a f*cking fascist 100 year old man laugh. Jason Henderson wrote: Byrd was a Grand Dragon And he's still in place ? :wtf: ! Anyway, IMO it's not because some bastards succeed that it's a reason to forgive to all BTW, is KKK recognized as a terrorist organisation ? Jason Henderson wrote: the dreaded "N" word :confused:
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
KaЯl wrote: And he's still in place ? Absolutely! We've even had communists, drunk drivers, queers, jews, women, con men, the whole gamut in our government. At various times all of these groups and others have been viewed as pariahs - we do not block the disparate views of individuals, but cherish them for the unique contributions they all make. The liberal media has tried to quash the right if individual expression of opinion, and on many fronts it has largely succeeded, but this nation is still a place of diversity, and tolerance is supposed to be a fundamental part of who we are. To depose a politician for being a past member of the KKK, or for once opposing a cultural change that he has since accepted as the will of the majority would be the ultimate un-American act! Diversity of opinion has led to duels and fist fights in the hallowed halls of Congress, and in my opinion, we were the stronger for it. This too civilized, politically correct land is doomed if a change in direction isn't forthcoming soon. I'd even vote for a VBer, just for the change! "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
-
KaЯl wrote: And you are for Death Penalty (you deny this capacity of remission to a convicted but not to a politician ) :omg: Murder is a lot different than being a former segregationist. KaЯl wrote: Why not? It uses terror to achieve political targets, doesn't it ? I htink they are a recognized organization with the same free speech rights as everyone else. Now if they start lynching people, I suspect we'll see them on the terrorist list.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *Murder is a crime against a person, segregationism is a crime against humanity. Both should lead to court with the same result. Jason Henderson wrote: Now if they start lynching people, I suspect we'll see them on the terrorist list. You mean if they start lynching people again :~ ?
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
-
But Byrd used the N word just a couple of years ago. By using the same level of thinking the democrats are using against Lott, we can say that Byrd is a racist.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *Jason Henderson wrote: By using the same level of thinking the democrats are using against Lott, we can say that Byrd is a racist. funny, i haven't heard the "democrats" say anything about Lott. all of the criticism i've heard has come from republicans or the press. maybe the democrats are talking about it, but they're not making headlines with it. -c
-
Murder is a crime against a person, segregationism is a crime against humanity. Both should lead to court with the same result. Jason Henderson wrote: Now if they start lynching people, I suspect we'll see them on the terrorist list. You mean if they start lynching people again :~ ?
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
So not allowing a person of a different race to drink from the same water fountain as you is a "crime against humanity"? From this statement alone, I think we should never let the French run anything. It may be a crime, but not against humanity. KaЯl wrote: You mean if they start lynching people again ? Exactly.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
KaЯl wrote: And he's still in place ? Absolutely! We've even had communists, drunk drivers, queers, jews, women, con men, the whole gamut in our government. At various times all of these groups and others have been viewed as pariahs - we do not block the disparate views of individuals, but cherish them for the unique contributions they all make. The liberal media has tried to quash the right if individual expression of opinion, and on many fronts it has largely succeeded, but this nation is still a place of diversity, and tolerance is supposed to be a fundamental part of who we are. To depose a politician for being a past member of the KKK, or for once opposing a cultural change that he has since accepted as the will of the majority would be the ultimate un-American act! Diversity of opinion has led to duels and fist fights in the hallowed halls of Congress, and in my opinion, we were the stronger for it. This too civilized, politically correct land is doomed if a change in direction isn't forthcoming soon. I'd even vote for a VBer, just for the change! "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
<Applause>Well said!</Applause>
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
Jason Henderson wrote: By using the same level of thinking the democrats are using against Lott, we can say that Byrd is a racist. funny, i haven't heard the "democrats" say anything about Lott. all of the criticism i've heard has come from republicans or the press. maybe the democrats are talking about it, but they're not making headlines with it. -c
You need to get out from under that rock from time to time Chris. ;) The Democrats from Ted Kennedy to Kwaese Mfume (that has to be misspelled) have lambasted Lott for their own political benefit. Even Jesse Jackson stepped into it.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
You need to get out from under that rock from time to time Chris. ;) The Democrats from Ted Kennedy to Kwaese Mfume (that has to be misspelled) have lambasted Lott for their own political benefit. Even Jesse Jackson stepped into it.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *i watched CNN and MSNBC for like 3 hours last night (long story). all i saw were republicans and pundits talking about it.
-
KaЯl wrote: And he's still in place ? Absolutely! We've even had communists, drunk drivers, queers, jews, women, con men, the whole gamut in our government. At various times all of these groups and others have been viewed as pariahs - we do not block the disparate views of individuals, but cherish them for the unique contributions they all make. The liberal media has tried to quash the right if individual expression of opinion, and on many fronts it has largely succeeded, but this nation is still a place of diversity, and tolerance is supposed to be a fundamental part of who we are. To depose a politician for being a past member of the KKK, or for once opposing a cultural change that he has since accepted as the will of the majority would be the ultimate un-American act! Diversity of opinion has led to duels and fist fights in the hallowed halls of Congress, and in my opinion, we were the stronger for it. This too civilized, politically correct land is doomed if a change in direction isn't forthcoming soon. I'd even vote for a VBer, just for the change! "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
now hold on a second. you're claiming that the republicans are suddenly the champions of diversity, tolerance and expression? the homophobic, xenophobic, church-and-state-mingling, morality-dictating republicans are now the people ensuring a diverse and tolerant USA? WTF? -c
-
now hold on a second. you're claiming that the republicans are suddenly the champions of diversity, tolerance and expression? the homophobic, xenophobic, church-and-state-mingling, morality-dictating republicans are now the people ensuring a diverse and tolerant USA? WTF? -c
Chris Losinger wrote: you're claiming that the republicans are suddenly the champions of diversity, tolerance and expression? I don't believe that I mentioned Republicans. "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
-
Chris Losinger wrote: you're claiming that the republicans are suddenly the champions of diversity, tolerance and expression? I don't believe that I mentioned Republicans. "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
Roger Wright wrote: I don't believe that I mentioned Republicans. no, but you did mention the "liberal media", which is enough to imply that the alternative is better.
-
So not allowing a person of a different race to drink from the same water fountain as you is a "crime against humanity"? From this statement alone, I think we should never let the French run anything. It may be a crime, but not against humanity. KaЯl wrote: You mean if they start lynching people again ? Exactly.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism *Jason Henderson wrote: So not allowing a person of a different race to drink from the same water fountain as you is a "crime against humanity"? Yep. Just using the expression "different race" is an offense. There's the human race, point. Jason Henderson wrote: From this statement alone, I think we should never let the French run anything. Not the French, but me. Believe me, it's not the same :)
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
-
Jason Henderson wrote: So not allowing a person of a different race to drink from the same water fountain as you is a "crime against humanity"? Yep. Just using the expression "different race" is an offense. There's the human race, point. Jason Henderson wrote: From this statement alone, I think we should never let the French run anything. Not the French, but me. Believe me, it's not the same :)
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
KaЯl wrote: Yep. Just using the expression "different race" is an offense. There's the human race, point. Alrighty then.
Jason Henderson
start page ; articles henderson is coming henderson is an opponent's worst nightmare * googlism * -
Jason Henderson wrote: How do you know he's a fascist?! I assimilate segregationism to facism. Jason Henderson wrote: The man ran for president in 1948! People can change. And you are for Death Penalty :laugh: (you deny this capacity of remission to a convicted but not to a politician :)) Jason Henderson wrote: I doubt it. Why not? It uses terror to achieve political targets, doesn't it ? Jason Henderson wrote: the dreaded "N" word I thought it was "Nazi" :-O
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
KaЯl wrote: the dreaded "N" word I thought it was "Nazi" See, you're about as well-informed as a bag of hammers. When you actually have some knowledge about what you're talking about, and when you've grown enough gray matter to actually form an opinion based on fact and studied reflection, then, and only then, may you speak. You aren't realted to the local Frog Prince are you? ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
-
this article[^] is about Trent Lott. I'm not a specialist of US internal politics, but from the articles I've read I believe this guy is one of these f*cking "hidden" racists, who is now ready to say anything to save his job. (This rant is NOT about the GOP, I don't know if Lott is representative of the Republican mentality)
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
No wonder you feel the need to express an adverse opinion about politics in this country. You're from France. That fact alone explains a lot, and we all know that being from France makes you an expert on everything in the United States. ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
-
No wonder you feel the need to express an adverse opinion about politics in this country. You're from France. That fact alone explains a lot, and we all know that being from France makes you an expert on everything in the United States. ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: being from France makes you an expert on everything in the United States It makes me a free man able to have an opinion on a lot of things.Because the audience here is half american, I adapt my topics. Would you be interested by european issues ? (Don't consider me as representative of my country, as I don't consider you as the typical american guy, frankly I don't think I am :))
I hurt so bad inside I wish you could see the world through my eyes It stays the same I just wanna laugh again
-
now hold on a second. you're claiming that the republicans are suddenly the champions of diversity, tolerance and expression? the homophobic, xenophobic, church-and-state-mingling, morality-dictating republicans are now the people ensuring a diverse and tolerant USA? WTF? -c
If he won't, I will. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle
