Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Victoria Windsor (AKA Victoria Saxe Coburg Gothe) is an illegitamate fake

Victoria Windsor (AKA Victoria Saxe Coburg Gothe) is an illegitamate fake

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comquestion
33 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

    you are closer to a traitor

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Grow up for christs sake, what do you think this is, the twelfth century?

    ============================== Nothing to say.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad, you insult the country of your birth and conveintly forget all the issues of these other countries you are so happy to champion. yes traitor is a old term that maybe should return, you have the right to your opinion something that this country has fought for. and i did not call you a traitor I just pointed out that you are closer to the definition of one than you are to the definition of a patriot, but then again you probably think that being a patriot is also something from history ps why the 12th century? are you saying that the last traitor was so long ago? of is this this another case of your poor understanding of history

    You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Erudite_Eric wrote:

      The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land.

      The profits of the Royal Estate were surrendered to the Treasury in exchange for the Civil List by King George III. The monies paid into the Treasury directly generated by the Royal Family exceed the money taken out, and that is before you add in hundreds of millions more in international tourism that they generate for the country. I would much rather the current system than the alternative which would have been President Tone or Dave.

      Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Not all the estates were surrendered by the way. It is not so much that I am anti monarch, yes, a monarchy is a bit of fun, and encourage tourism, it is just that she is out of date, so out of touch with the modern world, and the position an monarch should adopt. Charles is better, but he has no hope of becoming king, but at least he uses his position to try to make a difference in the world.

      ============================== Nothing to say.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

        no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad, you insult the country of your birth and conveintly forget all the issues of these other countries you are so happy to champion. yes traitor is a old term that maybe should return, you have the right to your opinion something that this country has fought for. and i did not call you a traitor I just pointed out that you are closer to the definition of one than you are to the definition of a patriot, but then again you probably think that being a patriot is also something from history ps why the 12th century? are you saying that the last traitor was so long ago? of is this this another case of your poor understanding of history

        You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

        no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad

        Tetchy! :laugh:

        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

        you insult the country of your birth

        No, I insulted a Queen, who isnt even the rightful sovereign. As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

        ============================== Nothing to say.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

          no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad

          Tetchy! :laugh:

          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

          you insult the country of your birth

          No, I insulted a Queen, who isnt even the rightful sovereign. As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

          ============================== Nothing to say.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          and I insulted a troll. and yes you can call your post a collection of

          Erudite_Eric wrote:

          As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

          you insult someone and then go nahnah when pulled about it I dont know why I bother with such a small minded twit, you think that insulting my head of state is clever, its not its easy to do and hold little value accept to anger people who respect her, now that is the behavour of a troll, maybe you would prefer a president for life as a head of state? or maybe the winner of big brother (much closer to you level of intellect i guess) you realy do have a problem with England dont you, what is it were you fightened by a Union flag when you were a child?

          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

            and I insulted a troll. and yes you can call your post a collection of

            Erudite_Eric wrote:

            As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

            you insult someone and then go nahnah when pulled about it I dont know why I bother with such a small minded twit, you think that insulting my head of state is clever, its not its easy to do and hold little value accept to anger people who respect her, now that is the behavour of a troll, maybe you would prefer a president for life as a head of state? or maybe the winner of big brother (much closer to you level of intellect i guess) you realy do have a problem with England dont you, what is it were you fightened by a Union flag when you were a child?

            You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Wow, I never met anyone who had swallowed the BS as much as you. Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches! You mug.

            ============================== Nothing to say.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Wow, I never met anyone who had swallowed the BS as much as you. Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches! You mug.

              ============================== Nothing to say.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              now whos touchy maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship sounds like you have a big chip and feel so badly done to. oh and what BS as the biggest shoveler around here is you

              You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Not all the estates were surrendered by the way. It is not so much that I am anti monarch, yes, a monarchy is a bit of fun, and encourage tourism, it is just that she is out of date, so out of touch with the modern world, and the position an monarch should adopt. Charles is better, but he has no hope of becoming king, but at least he uses his position to try to make a difference in the world.

                ============================== Nothing to say.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                all the royal estates were surrendered, at the begining of Victoria's rule the Crown had no assets, it was Victoria's rule and the canny investment of personnel wealth (most of which was Hubby's so German wealth) which meant that they were serious land owners at the end, but you dont like fact getting in the way of your rant do you. Its amazing how much inside infor you have? do you work for the Queen? as everyone seem to say she is down to earth and very much in tune with the modern world, something you seem to be ammiss

                You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                  now whos touchy maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship sounds like you have a big chip and feel so badly done to. oh and what BS as the biggest shoveler around here is you

                  You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                  maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship

                  Now there is logical reasoning for you. (Sarcasm intended).

                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                    all the royal estates were surrendered, at the begining of Victoria's rule the Crown had no assets, it was Victoria's rule and the canny investment of personnel wealth (most of which was Hubby's so German wealth) which meant that they were serious land owners at the end, but you dont like fact getting in the way of your rant do you. Its amazing how much inside infor you have? do you work for the Queen? as everyone seem to say she is down to earth and very much in tune with the modern world, something you seem to be ammiss

                    You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Thats right, choose to answer the smallest part of my post and ignore the majority of it. Probably because you cant deny it.

                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Thats right, choose to answer the smallest part of my post and ignore the majority of it. Probably because you cant deny it.

                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      really which bit didn’t i answer? the bit about being out of touch? the bit about being out of date? the bit about her role (which by the way is pretty much set by the political parties) or the right to question you on how you know she has no impact? your post is little more than petty jealousy what should be doing in your worthy opinion, commenting on govenment? or maybe more like that worthy in touch personage the archBishop of Canterbury?

                      You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                        maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship

                        Now there is logical reasoning for you. (Sarcasm intended).

                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Erudite_Eric wrote:

                        Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches!

                        and if this had been the attitude of your grand parents you would be speaking German (oh I forget you probably are) your logical reasoning is that patriotism is bad and that any argument against you is BS? and you accuse others of logic failure!

                        You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                          Erudite_Eric wrote:

                          Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches!

                          and if this had been the attitude of your grand parents you would be speaking German (oh I forget you probably are) your logical reasoning is that patriotism is bad and that any argument against you is BS? and you accuse others of logic failure!

                          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          You already speak German, they invaded in the 7th and 9th centuries. Anyway, at least of the Germans HAD invaded 100 years ago the U< might have a manufacturing sector to speak of and an economy that isnt completely fucked. I dont have any problem defending something I value, and it just might happen to be my patch of earth, but defend a flag? An incumbent power system? I am reminded of a big party held in Luton to celebrate the end of the first world war. All the local big wigs got together, the industrialists, the merchants and so on. NOT A SINGLE SERVING MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES WAS INVITED. Thats what they died for. It wasnt to 'not speak German' as stupid people often state, it was to keep the existing power structure in place. Tell me, before Germany united and industrialised, why did Britain support Germany? And after why did Britain oppose it? Why dont you THINK for a change.

                          ============================== Nothing to say.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            You already speak German, they invaded in the 7th and 9th centuries. Anyway, at least of the Germans HAD invaded 100 years ago the U< might have a manufacturing sector to speak of and an economy that isnt completely fucked. I dont have any problem defending something I value, and it just might happen to be my patch of earth, but defend a flag? An incumbent power system? I am reminded of a big party held in Luton to celebrate the end of the first world war. All the local big wigs got together, the industrialists, the merchants and so on. NOT A SINGLE SERVING MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES WAS INVITED. Thats what they died for. It wasnt to 'not speak German' as stupid people often state, it was to keep the existing power structure in place. Tell me, before Germany united and industrialised, why did Britain support Germany? And after why did Britain oppose it? Why dont you THINK for a change.

                            ============================== Nothing to say.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            not feeding trolls today - try tomorrow

                            You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                              really which bit didn’t i answer? the bit about being out of touch? the bit about being out of date? the bit about her role (which by the way is pretty much set by the political parties) or the right to question you on how you know she has no impact? your post is little more than petty jealousy what should be doing in your worthy opinion, commenting on govenment? or maybe more like that worthy in touch personage the archBishop of Canterbury?

                              You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              Go on then,. tell me how in touch she is. Tell me how Blair DIDNT have to convince her to fly the flag at half mast when Diana died. The public opinion was NOT running against her at the time. Next tell me all about the charitable work she does the schemes she runs you know, the actual differences SHE makes to HER people. (Sitting back waiting for no response at alll...)

                              ============================== Nothing to say.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                                not feeding trolls today - try tomorrow

                                You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                Ha! I see the big run away tactic when you can no longer propose a decent argument. You lost pal, I won, if you want to vouch it in such terms. ;P But seriously, look at history, look at why Britain supported Germany in the Franc Prussian war, and didnt in WWi. If you were a REAL patriot you would speak Brythonic Celtic, not a derivative of low German. But you dont. You chose the particular chunk of timelime to jump on and call it your bandwaggon, the one that happens to be something from about 60 years ago. Why not think outside the box, and make a better decision? For example, as you have said, I live abroad, in France, perhaps I am a greater patriot than you because I live in the country that invaded and dominated Britain? Perhaps speaking French is the true patriotic language (if you chose the 12th century chunk of Britains timeline.) But I dont really give a shit. I live my life, I am me. I am not defined by some family that perchance took power on some island centuries ago, by some narrow minded sacrificial BS. Its your choice if you want to be though.

                                ============================== Nothing to say.

                                B 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Ha! I see the big run away tactic when you can no longer propose a decent argument. You lost pal, I won, if you want to vouch it in such terms. ;P But seriously, look at history, look at why Britain supported Germany in the Franc Prussian war, and didnt in WWi. If you were a REAL patriot you would speak Brythonic Celtic, not a derivative of low German. But you dont. You chose the particular chunk of timelime to jump on and call it your bandwaggon, the one that happens to be something from about 60 years ago. Why not think outside the box, and make a better decision? For example, as you have said, I live abroad, in France, perhaps I am a greater patriot than you because I live in the country that invaded and dominated Britain? Perhaps speaking French is the true patriotic language (if you chose the 12th century chunk of Britains timeline.) But I dont really give a shit. I live my life, I am me. I am not defined by some family that perchance took power on some island centuries ago, by some narrow minded sacrificial BS. Its your choice if you want to be though.

                                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  sorry too busy to feed trolls

                                  You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Go on then,. tell me how in touch she is. Tell me how Blair DIDNT have to convince her to fly the flag at half mast when Diana died. The public opinion was NOT running against her at the time. Next tell me all about the charitable work she does the schemes she runs you know, the actual differences SHE makes to HER people. (Sitting back waiting for no response at alll...)

                                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    Yep, more running away since you cant provide any proof that she actually tries to do some good for Britain. At least Charles does, when (if) he becomes king I will have more respect for the job.

                                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Ha! I see the big run away tactic when you can no longer propose a decent argument. You lost pal, I won, if you want to vouch it in such terms. ;P But seriously, look at history, look at why Britain supported Germany in the Franc Prussian war, and didnt in WWi. If you were a REAL patriot you would speak Brythonic Celtic, not a derivative of low German. But you dont. You chose the particular chunk of timelime to jump on and call it your bandwaggon, the one that happens to be something from about 60 years ago. Why not think outside the box, and make a better decision? For example, as you have said, I live abroad, in France, perhaps I am a greater patriot than you because I live in the country that invaded and dominated Britain? Perhaps speaking French is the true patriotic language (if you chose the 12th century chunk of Britains timeline.) But I dont really give a shit. I live my life, I am me. I am not defined by some family that perchance took power on some island centuries ago, by some narrow minded sacrificial BS. Its your choice if you want to be though.

                                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      god you are realy 12 arnt you, you insult and then think its a game, wiki need to change its definition of troll and just point it at you. let me see Franco-Prussian war, a war started by france by attacking a long standing ally, yet as the UK wasnt threatened we kept out of it, WW1 Germany attacked a country with which we had a treaty to aid them why would I speak a dead language instead of one that has been developed over hundreds of years and is pretty much the defacto would language (even Itailian Universities are changing to english as thier language) no I choose to point out that if you do not stand for something you end up the bitch of someone who does. for someone so limited in there outlook I find this ammusing

                                      Quote:

                                      For example, as you have said, I live abroad, in France, perhaps I am a greater patriot than you because I live in the country that invaded and dominated Britain? Perhaps speaking French is the true patriotic language (if you chose the 12th century chunk of Britains timeline.)

                                      firstly France never invaded UK, that was the normans a nordic race and in 11th century (your history is so poor) in the 12th the Normans were kicking frence ass all over france after the french king stole their ancestorial lands if you think that history has no impact on your current life then not only are you insulting but stupid, a lot of people gave up thier lives so you can say such things, if it wasnt for those families over the centuries france would not even exist maybe you should get off your bigoted high horse and look beyond the girly mags headlines you seem to be rlying on

                                      You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups