New York City's Inconsistent Obesity Policy
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
MehGerbil wrote:
these policies seem to be at odds with each other
..seems, as those munchies aren't enough to make one obese. You can buy pot legally in the Netherlands, and there aren't that many fat people in the coffeeshop.
MehGerbil wrote:
My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
They're usually paying to be super-sized :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
The real argument here is that they want to reduce the soft drink size but they leave the real killer in place...gigantic heart attack burgers. [tags]retards, NYC, New York City
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012) -
MehGerbil wrote:
these policies seem to be at odds with each other
..seems, as those munchies aren't enough to make one obese. You can buy pot legally in the Netherlands, and there aren't that many fat people in the coffeeshop.
MehGerbil wrote:
My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
They're usually paying to be super-sized :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
They're usually paying to be super-sized
Coffee! Monitor! Wipe! :laugh:
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
Yes, this is Mayor Bloomberg at his finest... In other words, he's in his last term and no longer cares if everyone hates him... How I regret voting for him last election... Yes, I was fooled, like so many others. So, as someone who actually lives in NYC, I think this soda idea of his is completely stupid and unnecessary. If anything, NYC probably has a lower percentage of obese people than most of the rest of the country, simply because we drive less and walk more. If he wants to start another advertising campaign to ask people to cut down, that's just fine... But forcing places to stop serving large drinks? Ya know, I may not be a card-carrying Libertarian, but things like this definitely push me in that direction. And I don't know where you're getting the rest of your info, but the drug war is alive and well... And as foolish as ever (I've never touched the stuff, but I'm all for weed legalization)... I think Connecticut just did the medical legalization, but not NYC.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
Similar to an obese person ordering large order of fries and a diet drink at McD's.
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1 -
Similar to an obese person ordering large order of fries and a diet drink at McD's.
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1I resemble that statement. :)
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
Discussing it keeps you too busy to look at Bloomberg's real agenda.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
I don't think I've ever seen a fat hippie... too busy playing disc golf...
Be The Noise
-
They're not really banning sugary drinks, only limiting the size of the drinks you can buy at McDo. That's gonna help a friggin' lot. What they ought to do - if that's what they really want - is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar. But I can't really see that happening.
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
is to ban every drink
It would be nice if consumers themselves made healthy choices instead of gov't having to step in to force those choices on people lacking the intelligence or will or desire to moderate their own behaviors. Marc
My Blog
The Relationship Oriented Programming IDE
Melody's Amazon Herb Site -
They're not really banning sugary drinks, only limiting the size of the drinks you can buy at McDo. That's gonna help a friggin' lot. What they ought to do - if that's what they really want - is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar. But I can't really see that happening.
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
Johnny J. wrote:
is to ban every drink
It would be nice if consumers themselves made healthy choices instead of gov't having to step in to force those choices on people lacking the intelligence or will or desire to moderate their own behaviors. Marc
My Blog
The Relationship Oriented Programming IDE
Melody's Amazon Herb SiteThat shouldn't really be necessary in my opinion. It would be better if the stuff you could buy WAS a healthy product to start with. But manufacturers manufacture what the consumers want (or what they THINK the consumer wants) - and if people are not clever enough to deselect the stuff that's not healthy for them, the market is flooded by crap. By forcing consumers to buy healthy products you could actually force the manufactuers to produce healthy products as well. You could of course also try to persuade the manufacturers directly, but they're more concerned about money than they are concerned about the people... :sigh:
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
harold aptroot wrote:
Why would they even care? Do obese people pay less local taxes?
Yes. They die too early.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:
-
Johnny J. wrote:
is to ban every drink, no matter the size, in all outlets, that contain more than a certain amount of sugar alcohol.
Wasn't that named prohibition ? Did not turn out well.
As mentioned, I don't actually think it's doable, and in an ideal world it wouldn't be necessary either. :sigh:
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
Discussing it keeps you too busy to look at Bloomberg's real agenda.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Mark Wallace wrote:
Bloomberg's real agenda.
Which is???
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012) -
Rage wrote:
But then also cost less in health care. Pure Darwinism.
Rather lousy math. There's a whole plethora of related diseases that bring the industry millions in revenue :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:
-
That shouldn't really be necessary in my opinion. It would be better if the stuff you could buy WAS a healthy product to start with. But manufacturers manufacture what the consumers want (or what they THINK the consumer wants) - and if people are not clever enough to deselect the stuff that's not healthy for them, the market is flooded by crap. By forcing consumers to buy healthy products you could actually force the manufactuers to produce healthy products as well. You could of course also try to persuade the manufacturers directly, but they're more concerned about money than they are concerned about the people... :sigh:
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
It would be better if the stuff you could buy WAS a healthy product to start with. But manufacturers manufacture what the consumers want (or what they THINK the consumer wants) - and if people are not clever enough to deselect the stuff that's not healthy for them, the market is flooded by crap.
Aside from water, unsweetened tea, and coconut water (which are already on the market), are there any low calorie drinks? Are manufacturers holding magical delicious low calorie drinks from the masses?
-
New York city is banning sugary drinks[^] but is turning down the heat on smoking pot.[^] Given that pot smokers often suffer from "the munchies" these policies seem to be at odds with each other. My guess is when NYC gets even fatter they'll blame Doritos.
