I'm declaring a war...
-
That's valid JavaScript, but what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
(Clever = '+') - could that have been described as a peace of music?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
If it's chaos you want, do it this way
var war = null;
If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind. Ya can't fix stupid.
-
That's valid JavaScript, but what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
Say it again...
Software Zen:
delete this; -
(Clever = '+') - could that have been described as a peace of music?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
a peace of music
I see what you did there...
Software Zen:
delete this; -
If it's chaos you want, do it this way
var war = null;
If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind. Ya can't fix stupid.
Wouldn't
nullbe the absence of chaos?Software Zen:
delete this; -
That's valid JavaScript, but what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
Say it again!
TTFN - Kent
-
-
You probably would not like to let it in, instead, as in -
let war;
-
It should be const. [War Never Changes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM3Y6uw6FtU).
I'd rather be phishing!
-
-
Just five minutes, not the full half hour.
-
Just five minutes, not the full half hour.
-
-
...and what is the compiler supposed to think is the implied type?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
Of course, there could also be... auto war; If the compiler were inspecting at variable names for possible type information, it just might treat that as volatile. :)
