Windows XP
-
Windows ME is my vote for the worst ever version of Windows - I "upgraded" my then boss's new laptop from ME to Windows 98, and everything just worked better.
How about Windows Bob, that's got to be a top contender. Up until Windows 10 the normal Microsoft Tick/Tock was good/bad OS. That should have put Windows 10 as a fix for Windows 8, NOT! I just wish that rather than rounding the corners on things, they would actually fix things! It has been over a month since they broke my email, but at least it will have round corners? It's not the version of operating system I don't like, it's their constant breaking of their basic system that I'm tired of.
-
I would venture to say that Windows 8 was the "first" step backward... I can't stand Windows 10. The flat design kills me, the plethora of extra processes just to maintain a functional OS is crazy. While I did recently build a Windows 10 machine for myself, since I know that eventually, I will require it, my primary workstation is still a Windows 7 64 bit machine with 32Gb of RAM and a bunch of SSDs in a few RAID configurations. That said, my home networks are well fire-walled, in fact, friends/guests/visitors that require WIFI access get an entirely different router and and gateway. All of my development/testing/work resources are on a separate network from the rest of my home, so as long as I don't do something terribly stupid, the lack of new security updates is not of too much concern to me. If it ever gets to the point that I can't run all of the development tools that I require on W7 64 bit, then I will bite the bullet and transition to the Windows 10 box, but until such a time, Windows 7 still rocks!
Yep, Windows 8 got me started looking seriously at Linux and BSD as alternatives to Windows. I now run MX Linux as my main OS and only boot to Windows 10 for gaming and the occasional photo editing session (I dislike Gimp!). I'd probably be running BSD as my main OS if it had better support for modern hardware.
-
My personal assertion is W10 does not need a monster CPU and is quite good... But, however, I cant be really sure... However my CPU however is around a few percent everytime I look at it... so... I have a hard time it is a performance hog....
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
wow. what cpu do you have? mine always goes up over time, mainly due to browsers. it returns when i restart it/them. and trying out Uno Platform recently my cpu went into the 70s and 80s (for the first time) and i had to reboot to get everything to calm down. i'm looking for something more heavy duty now. (it could just be a RAM issue. trying to figure out if my machine can take more. i always have a hard time getting info on that.) Current: Intel Core i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
-
wow. what cpu do you have? mine always goes up over time, mainly due to browsers. it returns when i restart it/them. and trying out Uno Platform recently my cpu went into the 70s and 80s (for the first time) and i had to reboot to get everything to calm down. i'm looking for something more heavy duty now. (it could just be a RAM issue. trying to figure out if my machine can take more. i always have a hard time getting info on that.) Current: Intel Core i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
I got DDR4 memory, 16Gb, 512 SSD, and some Ryzen / AMD something cpu
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Super Lloyd wrote:
my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
That's my problem with W10. All I really needed was XP + support for modern peripherals + better security (patches, bug fixes, etc.). I did not need all of the cruft that comes with Windows 10, and that requires the "monster modern CPU".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Windows NT was popular due to the filesystem it used (NTFS) being more secure in those days. However, once NTFS was no longer considered secure the NT technologies became outdated and less popular. So, windows 7, 8 and 10 replaced it. If you like stand-alone systems that are not internet connected and can remain stable then that is what NT was good for in it's day. You could probably manage that with windows 10 by working out how you could run the OS with a minimal build.
-
I would venture to say that Windows 8 was the "first" step backward... I can't stand Windows 10. The flat design kills me, the plethora of extra processes just to maintain a functional OS is crazy. While I did recently build a Windows 10 machine for myself, since I know that eventually, I will require it, my primary workstation is still a Windows 7 64 bit machine with 32Gb of RAM and a bunch of SSDs in a few RAID configurations. That said, my home networks are well fire-walled, in fact, friends/guests/visitors that require WIFI access get an entirely different router and and gateway. All of my development/testing/work resources are on a separate network from the rest of my home, so as long as I don't do something terribly stupid, the lack of new security updates is not of too much concern to me. If it ever gets to the point that I can't run all of the development tools that I require on W7 64 bit, then I will bite the bullet and transition to the Windows 10 box, but until such a time, Windows 7 still rocks!
Even though the author ask about your experience with Windows XP I agree with K Personett Windows 7 is the product that MS should have enhanced and not over engineered I can only make this statement based on past experience with MS OS's namely Windows 95 Windows XP and the nightmare of Windows ME My experience with Windows ME taught me to READ what other professionals thought about a new OS before I blindly upgraded because it was NEW and IMPROVED My biggest complaint was when Microsoft and I had a go around about my copy of Microsoft Office 2003 which I purchased on a DVD They refused to let me install it on a new Widows 7 64 bit machine and accused me of trying to install pirated software after numerous complaint emails to Bill Gates I did not believe someone from MS contacted me and said the problem was fixed Final thought FWIW New is nice if it includes Improvements with out BLOAT and maintains backward comparability with high priced MS Software
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
I prefer Windows 10 UI way over XP, but if we were talking about an OS that uses way less resources historically I would have gone with Windows 2000, for the lightest footprint but still a decent desktop for developing on. Would I want to go back to W2K? heck no. But I do miss it's lightweight install and system requirements, XP was heavy compared to it, W7 nearly gave me shock with the install size. Win10 although heavy in some ways has some pretty good features that I would miss going backwards
-
Even though the author ask about your experience with Windows XP I agree with K Personett Windows 7 is the product that MS should have enhanced and not over engineered I can only make this statement based on past experience with MS OS's namely Windows 95 Windows XP and the nightmare of Windows ME My experience with Windows ME taught me to READ what other professionals thought about a new OS before I blindly upgraded because it was NEW and IMPROVED My biggest complaint was when Microsoft and I had a go around about my copy of Microsoft Office 2003 which I purchased on a DVD They refused to let me install it on a new Widows 7 64 bit machine and accused me of trying to install pirated software after numerous complaint emails to Bill Gates I did not believe someone from MS contacted me and said the problem was fixed Final thought FWIW New is nice if it includes Improvements with out BLOAT and maintains backward comparability with high priced MS Software
Windows 7 was the natural evolution of Windows XP. I still use Windows XP virtual machines for running tons of JScripts that mimic xml-http clients that interact with the server products I write/maintain. I use 32 bit XP VMs mainly because the memory requirements are low and it runs well in a sandbox under Hyper-V. I still have some 64 bit XP installations backed up, but no need to run them any more due to the limited usage I require. I don't do any PC based gaming. I spend enough time on computers while working.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!