Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. brainstorming about political discussion on facebook

brainstorming about political discussion on facebook

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcomalgorithmsperformancetutorial
30 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Super Lloyd

    I have the have the, perhaps naively idealistic view, that one might occasionally find honest politicians in the small fringe parties! :)

    A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

    Y Offline
    Y Offline
    yacCarsten
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    You should think yourself lucky, we have the best politicians that money can buy. ;P

    // TODO: Insert something here

    Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

    S Richard DeemingR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • G GuyThiebaut

      I did once recommend dropping a frog into the Christmas punch of a popular journalist on a social media site. The algorithm picked up the word "punch" and I was banned for a day. It takes a little skill to word things in a manner that will not get the pearl clutching algorithms from taking things out of context. (For those not in the know "punch" is a drink)

      “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

      ― Christopher Hitchens

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Super Lloyd
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      haha, damn!

      A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Y yacCarsten

        You should think yourself lucky, we have the best politicians that money can buy. ;P

        // TODO: Insert something here

        Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Super Lloyd
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        fair dinkum! :laugh: ;P

        A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Y yacCarsten

          You should think yourself lucky, we have the best politicians that money can buy. ;P

          // TODO: Insert something here

          Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

          Richard DeemingR Offline
          Richard DeemingR Offline
          Richard Deeming
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Whoever paid for our lot should be asking for a refund. :laugh:


          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

            Ah, the good old Daily Fail. The paper that campaigned vigorously against the "yellow peril" of Chinese immigrants. The paper which campaigned against granting women and lower-class men the right to vote, and against granting independence to India. The paper that supported the actual Nazis (right up until it became apparent they were going to lose). The paper that was a big fan of apartheid. The paper that wanted to identify and abort homosexual foetuses based on a so-called "gay gene" test. The paper that recently partnered with The People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese communist party. And that's before you get to the Fail Online's "sidebar of shame", which was infamous for perving over predominantly female - and sometimes even underage - celebrities. But sure, we'll pay attention when they criticize the perceived behaviour of another website. :laugh:


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Amarnath S
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Being an Indian, I am not sure of the veracity of British websites and newspapers. Just gave the news from one of the sites. I find the same news being reported on a dozen Indian websites, and here is a sample link - 'Commie As F***...' Twitter engineer makes explosive claims[^]

            Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Amarnath S

              Being an Indian, I am not sure of the veracity of British websites and newspapers. Just gave the news from one of the sites. I find the same news being reported on a dozen Indian websites, and here is a sample link - 'Commie As F***...' Twitter engineer makes explosive claims[^]

              Richard DeemingR Offline
              Richard DeemingR Offline
              Richard Deeming
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Amarnath S wrote:

              the veracity of British websites and newspapers

              Most are about as trustworthy as our politicians. :laugh:


              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Super Lloyd

                As some of you might have been aware by some Australian post... Australian election are coming this Saturday! On Facebook, not as private message but on a wall, someone shared an handy guide to all the minor parties. I commented, and I quote from memory, the post has been removed "party X is a bunch of crooks, shoot them on sight". Now I was not really recommending to go full American and do a public shooting for real. It was more like a metaphor between like minded small group of friend, to emphasize how untrustworthy were those wanna be minister. Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer, thanks John Howard (even if you're a crook in other aspect). At any rate, The Algorithm told me that my post was inflammatory and has been removed, and I could appeal if I think I was misunderstood. I didn't, annoying but no big deals. In the past I noticed many web site have some heavy handed, wild blanketed rude language filter and they are just gonna ignore my complaint. Plus hey, I did use the words "shoot people". I mean obviously nobody I know (and nobody that would read that post) will think I was really advocating it, but, emm.. The Algorithm will think I mean my word. The Algorithm being as subtle as a 3 years old. Perhaps for good reason, according to the rumor I hear on the internet. But I thought about it again today... it was just one click away, should have I complained, what says you?

                A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                It's about all that a company can do to adhere to EU law; some stuff needs to be removed in 24hrs. You should complain, because it makes you feel better, but don't expect any changes.

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                  Ah, the good old Daily Fail. The paper that campaigned vigorously against the "yellow peril" of Chinese immigrants. The paper which campaigned against granting women and lower-class men the right to vote, and against granting independence to India. The paper that supported the actual Nazis (right up until it became apparent they were going to lose). The paper that was a big fan of apartheid. The paper that wanted to identify and abort homosexual foetuses based on a so-called "gay gene" test. The paper that recently partnered with The People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese communist party. And that's before you get to the Fail Online's "sidebar of shame", which was infamous for perving over predominantly female - and sometimes even underage - celebrities. But sure, we'll pay attention when they criticize the perceived behaviour of another website. :laugh:


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgs1963
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Ha! When all else fails, blame the source! :rolleyes:

                  Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F fgs1963

                    Ha! When all else fails, blame the source! :rolleyes:

                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard Deeming
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Oh, I'm sorry - I didn't realise we weren't allowed to blame the gutter-press for things they'd actually done. :laugh: I can only assume you're not familiar with Viscount Rothermere's "Tory Propaganda Rag", aka the Daily Mail. Essentially, they're about as trustworthy a news-source as the drunk guy down the pub who claims to be The Proclaimers' uncle.


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                      Ah, the good old Daily Fail. The paper that campaigned vigorously against the "yellow peril" of Chinese immigrants. The paper which campaigned against granting women and lower-class men the right to vote, and against granting independence to India. The paper that supported the actual Nazis (right up until it became apparent they were going to lose). The paper that was a big fan of apartheid. The paper that wanted to identify and abort homosexual foetuses based on a so-called "gay gene" test. The paper that recently partnered with The People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Chinese communist party. And that's before you get to the Fail Online's "sidebar of shame", which was infamous for perving over predominantly female - and sometimes even underage - celebrities. But sure, we'll pay attention when they criticize the perceived behaviour of another website. :laugh:


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      TNCaver
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      That was one long-winded logical fallacy.

                      If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                      Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T TNCaver

                        That was one long-winded logical fallacy.

                        If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard Deeming
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        I think they prefer the name "The Daily Mail"; calling it "Long-Winded Logical Fallacy" wouldn't sell as many papers. :laugh:


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                          Oh, I'm sorry - I didn't realise we weren't allowed to blame the gutter-press for things they'd actually done. :laugh: I can only assume you're not familiar with Viscount Rothermere's "Tory Propaganda Rag", aka the Daily Mail. Essentially, they're about as trustworthy a news-source as the drunk guy down the pub who claims to be The Proclaimers' uncle.


                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                          F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgs1963
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Richard Deeming wrote:

                          I can only assume you're not familiar with Viscount Rothermere's "Tory Propaganda Rag", aka the Daily Mail. Essentially, they're about as trustworthy a news-source as the drunk guy down the pub who claims to be The Proclaimers' uncle.

                          Ahhh... the British version of CNN. :thumbsup:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Super Lloyd

                            As some of you might have been aware by some Australian post... Australian election are coming this Saturday! On Facebook, not as private message but on a wall, someone shared an handy guide to all the minor parties. I commented, and I quote from memory, the post has been removed "party X is a bunch of crooks, shoot them on sight". Now I was not really recommending to go full American and do a public shooting for real. It was more like a metaphor between like minded small group of friend, to emphasize how untrustworthy were those wanna be minister. Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer, thanks John Howard (even if you're a crook in other aspect). At any rate, The Algorithm told me that my post was inflammatory and has been removed, and I could appeal if I think I was misunderstood. I didn't, annoying but no big deals. In the past I noticed many web site have some heavy handed, wild blanketed rude language filter and they are just gonna ignore my complaint. Plus hey, I did use the words "shoot people". I mean obviously nobody I know (and nobody that would read that post) will think I was really advocating it, but, emm.. The Algorithm will think I mean my word. The Algorithm being as subtle as a 3 years old. Perhaps for good reason, according to the rumor I hear on the internet. But I thought about it again today... it was just one click away, should have I complained, what says you?

                            A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            David Crow
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Super Lloyd wrote:

                            Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer...

                            So the bad guys surrendered their guns? Since you can't own a gun for reasons of self defense, how do Aussies protect themselves in the face of imminent danger?

                            "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                            "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                            "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

                            M S 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • S Super Lloyd

                              As some of you might have been aware by some Australian post... Australian election are coming this Saturday! On Facebook, not as private message but on a wall, someone shared an handy guide to all the minor parties. I commented, and I quote from memory, the post has been removed "party X is a bunch of crooks, shoot them on sight". Now I was not really recommending to go full American and do a public shooting for real. It was more like a metaphor between like minded small group of friend, to emphasize how untrustworthy were those wanna be minister. Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer, thanks John Howard (even if you're a crook in other aspect). At any rate, The Algorithm told me that my post was inflammatory and has been removed, and I could appeal if I think I was misunderstood. I didn't, annoying but no big deals. In the past I noticed many web site have some heavy handed, wild blanketed rude language filter and they are just gonna ignore my complaint. Plus hey, I did use the words "shoot people". I mean obviously nobody I know (and nobody that would read that post) will think I was really advocating it, but, emm.. The Algorithm will think I mean my word. The Algorithm being as subtle as a 3 years old. Perhaps for good reason, according to the rumor I hear on the internet. But I thought about it again today... it was just one click away, should have I complained, what says you?

                              A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                              V Offline
                              V Offline
                              Vivi Chellappa
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              John Howard?! I remember a T-shirt or a placard bearing the words “John Hunt is a Coward”!😂😂😂

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                I think they prefer the name "The Daily Mail"; calling it "Long-Winded Logical Fallacy" wouldn't sell as many papers. :laugh:


                                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                TNCaver
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                I wasn't talking about the name of the paper. :)

                                If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D David Crow

                                  Super Lloyd wrote:

                                  Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer...

                                  So the bad guys surrendered their guns? Since you can't own a gun for reasons of self defense, how do Aussies protect themselves in the face of imminent danger?

                                  "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                                  "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                                  "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mycroft Holmes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  For the run of the mill Aussie the "imminent danger" also does not carry a gun, this does preclude the criminal/gang elements who are thoroughly weponised. Some areas are setting up vigilante groups to protect themselves against youth crime gangs.

                                  Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Super Lloyd

                                    As some of you might have been aware by some Australian post... Australian election are coming this Saturday! On Facebook, not as private message but on a wall, someone shared an handy guide to all the minor parties. I commented, and I quote from memory, the post has been removed "party X is a bunch of crooks, shoot them on sight". Now I was not really recommending to go full American and do a public shooting for real. It was more like a metaphor between like minded small group of friend, to emphasize how untrustworthy were those wanna be minister. Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer, thanks John Howard (even if you're a crook in other aspect). At any rate, The Algorithm told me that my post was inflammatory and has been removed, and I could appeal if I think I was misunderstood. I didn't, annoying but no big deals. In the past I noticed many web site have some heavy handed, wild blanketed rude language filter and they are just gonna ignore my complaint. Plus hey, I did use the words "shoot people". I mean obviously nobody I know (and nobody that would read that post) will think I was really advocating it, but, emm.. The Algorithm will think I mean my word. The Algorithm being as subtle as a 3 years old. Perhaps for good reason, according to the rumor I hear on the internet. But I thought about it again today... it was just one click away, should have I complained, what says you?

                                    A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Sanders the other one
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    FB pulled a comment of mine after the following exchange: Anon: "Don't ask me to tell you what I think of the Stone Roses." Me: "I wouldn't. Ian Brown will come round and punch you out!" This was (obviously) meant as a joke (he has a bit of a reputation), but the censorship bots clearly have no SOH. To this day, my account still carries a 'warning' status because of it. Well, FB, you can take that and stick it. Anyway no, I see no mileage in chasing it up. There's a brick wall over there - if you're desperate, you can bang you head on that.

                                    Paul Sanders. Not that the story need be long, but it will take a long while to make it short - Henry David Thoreau Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • V Vivi Chellappa

                                      John Howard?! I remember a T-shirt or a placard bearing the words “John Hunt is a Coward”!😂😂😂

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Super Lloyd
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      I don't like him much.. but someone mention recently that he was the one that remove lots of guns from circulation after a mass shooting. Never happen again since then. So there is that....

                                      A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D David Crow

                                        Super Lloyd wrote:

                                        Plus we don't have a tradition of public shooting here, I mean we did but no longer...

                                        So the bad guys surrendered their guns? Since you can't own a gun for reasons of self defense, how do Aussies protect themselves in the face of imminent danger?

                                        "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                                        "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                                        "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Super Lloyd
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        It's why I rather be a surfie than swim in the ocean. You can't outswim a rip, that's where then most death occur in Australia, drowning out of exhaustion. Swim perpendicular to it until you're out of the rip. But, when you're on your surfboard, you won't be take away by the rip and you can easily come back to the shore or rest. Other than that, I am not quite what "danger" you're talking about... mmm... But gun don't quite seem necessary...

                                        A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          It's about all that a company can do to adhere to EU law; some stuff needs to be removed in 24hrs. You should complain, because it makes you feel better, but don't expect any changes.

                                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Super Lloyd
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          Wow.. an informative an answer regarding this question! Not that I had bad expectation of the CodeProject crowd, on the contrary, but it's just that I don't think there was much to say! Thanks man! :)

                                          A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups