Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Language + ? = BFF

Language + ? = BFF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpc++javagraphicstutorial
44 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Single Step Debugger

    Again, not verry C++ specific. Same for structures.

    There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

    D Offline
    D Offline
    David ONeil
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Quote:

    What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language?

    That was your question. template, virtual, and class are all better answers than vector. In fact, vector is an idiotic answer to that specific question. Especially since vector isn't a structure or operator. :doh: :doh: :doh: Of course, neither are the items I've given, but they do define the language.

    Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Single Step Debugger

      What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language? As an example, I was thinking of: C * C++ - vector C# - List Java - arrays Any other languages or thoughts?

      There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      megaadam
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      I would've said Java class Object But on the other hand I must admit that, when it comes to Java for me personally, a ten-foot-pole aint long enough :cool:

      "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        And no vector in C++ V1 either ... languages improve! :laugh: But string isn't too bad - it's not perfect, but it is way, way better than the char* / const char * mess that preceded it.

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        P Online
        P Online
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        OriginalGriff wrote:

        languages improve

        Then it's not the same language.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Single Step Debugger

          Yes, Dictionary is verry powerful when you search by key as it gives you O (log N) search, no duplications, ets. But if we go this path then DataTable is even more interesting. I also don't like how you can shoot yourself in the leg with the STL map. One assignment with missing reference operator and you are working with old data/copy.

          There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

          0 Offline
          0 Offline
          0x01AA
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          STL map is pretty ok, but you need to know how to use it....

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

            Python: a tab and three spaces just to annoy people.

            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

            P Online
            P Online
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            How big is the tab? Like a bar tab?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Gary R Wheeler

              My favorite .NET data structure is Dictionary<_T_> hands down. I always found the C++ equivalents (STL's map and MFC's CMap) somewhat klunkier, mostly because of the template usage and resultant inscrutable compiler diagnostics.

              Software Zen: delete this;

              P Online
              P Online
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              enums are also way better in .net languages.

              0 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Single Step Debugger

                What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language? As an example, I was thinking of: C * C++ - vector C# - List Java - arrays Any other languages or thoughts?

                There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                A Offline
                A Offline
                Amarnath S
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Javascript - "undefined". :-)

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Single Step Debugger

                  What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language? As an example, I was thinking of: C * C++ - vector C# - List Java - arrays Any other languages or thoughts?

                  There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  honey the codewitch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  C++ for me would be template I don't really use the STL that much due to working with tiny amounts of RAM.

                  To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                    Python: a tab and three spaces just to annoy people.

                    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                    V Offline
                    V Offline
                    Vikram A Punathambekar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    Python 3 doesn't allow mixing tabs and spaces though :) But I really wish they had gone with tabs as the preferred option rather than spaces X|

                    Cheers, Vikram.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Single Step Debugger

                      What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language? As an example, I was thinking of: C * C++ - vector C# - List Java - arrays Any other languages or thoughts?

                      There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kmoorevs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      Basic = Dim! :laugh:

                      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                        Python 3 doesn't allow mixing tabs and spaces though :) But I really wish they had gone with tabs as the preferred option rather than spaces X|

                        Cheers, Vikram.

                        P Online
                        P Online
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        Maybe there should be an option, perhaps something like strict.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Amarnath S

                          Javascript - "undefined". :-)

                          P Online
                          P Online
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          Visual Basic -- nothing Mmm, yeah, quite literally.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            enums are also way better in .net languages.

                            0 Offline
                            0 Offline
                            0x01AA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            Sorry, the only language I know, which treats enum as enum is Modula2. All languages who allow to assign an enum item a individual value don't treat enum as enum and it should be forbidden that these languages missuse the a type called enum. ;)

                            P 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0 0x01AA

                              Sorry, the only language I know, which treats enum as enum is Modula2. All languages who allow to assign an enum item a individual value don't treat enum as enum and it should be forbidden that these languages missuse the a type called enum. ;)

                              P Online
                              P Online
                              PIEBALDconsult
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              Unsure what you are saying. Do you mean the ability to assign a value which isn't defined by the enum? I can agree with not liking that.

                              0 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PIEBALDconsult

                                Unsure what you are saying. Do you mean the ability to assign a value which isn't defined by the enum? I can agree with not liking that.

                                0 Offline
                                0 Offline
                                0x01AA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                My view, only: enumeration should be only enumeration. Means nobody should have the right to assign a specific value to any member of an enum. enum {theFirst, theSecond} should always end theFirst= 0, theSecond= 1. Even they should not be addressed by an intgeger value. Like it is in e.g. Modula2. And no one should be allowed to define theFirst= 1000 Sorry, I'm not native english and therefore I have problems to express me. [Edit] An enumeration where you can define element0= -100 or whatever and element1= 100 is not an enumeration for me ;)

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0 0x01AA

                                  My view, only: enumeration should be only enumeration. Means nobody should have the right to assign a specific value to any member of an enum. enum {theFirst, theSecond} should always end theFirst= 0, theSecond= 1. Even they should not be addressed by an intgeger value. Like it is in e.g. Modula2. And no one should be allowed to define theFirst= 1000 Sorry, I'm not native english and therefore I have problems to express me. [Edit] An enumeration where you can define element0= -100 or whatever and element1= 100 is not an enumeration for me ;)

                                  P Online
                                  P Online
                                  PIEBALDconsult
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  Ah, I see, but I disagree. I prefer to be able to specify the values. It's kinda important for "flags" type enumerated values. Maybe there should be an Attribute which enables things -- yes, I know about the FlagsAttribute, but it really only affects how strings are formed or parsed, it has nothing to do with what values are defined or assigned.

                                  public enum Option
                                  {
                                  None = 0
                                  ,
                                  UTF8 = 1
                                  ,
                                  ASCII = 2 | UTF8
                                  ,
                                  All = ASCII
                                  }

                                  Maybe a "bare" enum would enforce a strict value assignment and the ability to specify the values would require the developer to activate other features.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D David ONeil

                                    Quote:

                                    What single structure or specific operator better defines a given language?

                                    That was your question. template, virtual, and class are all better answers than vector. In fact, vector is an idiotic answer to that specific question. Especially since vector isn't a structure or operator. :doh: :doh: :doh: Of course, neither are the items I've given, but they do define the language.

                                    Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Single Step Debugger
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    Collections are also structures. You need to spend a little more time learning the basics.

                                    There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0 0x01AA

                                      STL map is pretty ok, but you need to know how to use it....

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Single Step Debugger
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      Yes. C++ demands more abstract thinking.

                                      There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H honey the codewitch

                                        C++ for me would be template I don't really use the STL that much due to working with tiny amounts of RAM.

                                        To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Single Step Debugger
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        You are lucky you have them. Not all embedded systems' compilers support templates (for example some Verifone proprietary systems).

                                        There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                                        H 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Single Step Debugger

                                          You are lucky you have them. Not all embedded systems' compilers support templates (for example some Verifone proprietary systems).

                                          There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                                          H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          honey the codewitch
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          I've had this discussion before, and where I come down on it, is if your compiler doesn't support a major language feature, like template, you don't support the C++ language - you support a C++ subset.

                                          To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups