Interesting. I'll keep your marketing remark in mind next time I'm faced with such decisions. Cheers. Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.

Ehsan Baghaki wrote: Is there an alternative class in c# for better http functionality? Response.Redirect or Server.Transfer Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.

Thank you for your solution. I like the idea of 256 file and checksum. I will try it now.

you must use a std::map instead if you want to identify a record with a unique key.

Use std::map or std::hash_map. Use the unique ID as the map's key, the object as the associated value. #include <map> class MyObject { ... int UniqueID() const; ... }; std::map<int, MyObject> myMap; To insert an item: MyObject o; myMap.insert(std::make_pair(o.UniqueID(), o)); To retrieve an item: MyObject anotherO = myMap[someID];

thanks for your help :)

I'm searching for this also! Plz help!!

Ehsan-de-Burge wrote: Any Suggestion how to get rid of this ? Yes, don't pass a CString to a function expecting char*. The GetString() prototype suggests that it expects a char* for the result, i am assuming it expects the buffer to exist and does not alloc one itself. You have initialized 'string' to "" which is at least 1 byte in size. When you pass 'string' to GetString() it downcasts to the buffer CString is using and passes that to GetString(). If GetString() expects the buffer to exist then you haven't made it big enough, if it alloc's one ... well then what you are doing is wrong in more ways than one. ...cmk Save the whales - collect the whole set

Ehsan-de-Burge wrote: Simple TCP Client by Nishant but i dosen't help me out! Could you explain how it does not help? "No matter where you go, there your are." - Buckaroo Banzai -pete

why don't yopu try the void *memset( void *dest, int c, size_t count ); function which inits the memory of a string with a given char on a certain length; or char *_strset( char *string, int c ); char *_strnset( char *string, int c, size_t count ); #include #include void main( void ) { char string[15] = "This is a test"; /* Set not more than 4 characters of string to be *'s */ printf( "Before: %s\n", string ); _strnset( string, '*', 4 ); printf( "After: %s\n", string ); } Output Before: This is a test After: **** is a test I hope this helped. gabby

Mysql 4 and later has support for SSL connections, older versions can use SSH tunneling. See http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Secure_connections.html

Capture the BeforeNavigate2 event and if the url is the same as the button url, do your thing. "We have done so much in the last 2 years, and it doesn't happen by standing around with your finger in your ear, hoping everyone thinks that that's nice." - Donald Rumsfeld Jason Henderson blog

i findout smthing, i have to set a Base class to both CMDIChildWnd and my own base class. and it seems that i have to Set BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CMy2View, CMDIChildWnd) is it true that the only way that a Child Window obey a View class is to make it with this line : CMDIChildWnd::Create(...) So to having a ChildWindow i have to set base to CMDIChildWnd and then i will lose my own base class, i mean i cant use OnPaint() Coz i have to set Message map to CMDIChildWnd. :confused: Any Suggestion ?

Yes, it is possible. Here is how: 1. Use the IWebBrowser2::Document property to obtain an IDispatch interface to the DOM document. 2. Query the obtained IDispatch for IHTMLDocument3. 3. Use the IHTMLDocument3::createTextNode() method to convert the root node to text. If you don't like that approach you can simply enable the menu bar using the IWebBrowser2::MenuBar() method. View source is there. Ivor S. Sargoytchev Dundas Software

Hello, the CPians around the world.;) We can't use Web Service in VC++(MFC), so we have to use SOAP for Web Service.:(( (MFC can't access .NET Framework.) SOAP Toolkit is for this. But, I suppose that we can use Managed C++ for Web Service.:cool: HTH. -Masaaki Onishi (eCoolSoft)- ASP.NET and Windows Development by C# and MFC. http://www.ecoolsoft.com

-=Ehsan-de-Burge=- wrote: is it true that OpenGL is better than DirectX ? That is an all too common question, that almost as often isn't qualified with "for this particular area" with an explanation of the area, making a "correct" answer impossible. As a general 3D visualization API, OpenGL is most certainly better than DirectX. Actually, it's the only 3D visualization API widely recognized, and if you in any way or form would like to run your application on anything but Windows (including Wine) OpenGL is again the only recognised API. If you on the other hand are prepared to limit your application to Windows only, and it seems you are prepared to do just that, DX is currently with the ATI 9700 a little ahead of OpenGL in terms of features - you can use more whistle and bells on todays highest-end PC consumer 3D card, the 9700 (Pro). But if you were interested in those "features" you'd already be knowing them, not having to ask this question. :-) For a more thorough examination, may I suggest you search the "advanced" forum over at opengl.org? There was a thread (a rather long thread, some months ago IIRC) a developer basically started with "This is it. I'm going DX". At the end of the thread he wrote something to the effect "OK, I'm convinced. Maybe DX wasn't such a great idea after all. OpenGL it still is for me". But it still boils down to: What are you going to use it for, and are you prepared to pay the price if you go with DirectX?