Awww!!! :sigh:

You can't do that.

jhwurmbach wrote:

Was that before or after the the screening of the highly bizarre submission porn titled "Abu Ghureid" made by the US Army?

Before. Beheadings have been going on a long time. Much longer than the War in Iraq. For example: Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was photographed being beheaded by his captors in Pakistan in 2002.[^]

Ilíon wrote:

grisly beheading of a Muslim by a Christian zealot

Well, that makes a change from watching all those christians being beheaded by muslims.

Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

If a Muslim woman chooses to wear a burqa of her own free will, she has every right to.

If it is of her own free will then she has every right to wear it. However, if it is not free will then it is oppression. Also, while she may freely wish to wear a hijab or burqua (which ever is the one covering everything but the eyes) it must fit properly. There have been a number of near accidents where I live because of Muslim women not wearing properly fitting clothing and it obscures their vision. Unless an accident actually occurs the police are mostly unwilling to do anything because they are fearful of being called racist even although these women are committing driving offences due to their inability to properly control the vehicle.

Adnan Siddiqi wrote:

forcing someone to wear something or NOT to wear something is called oppression.

Yes. It is a form of oppression. Oppression does not have to come from the government. It can come from within the home. The male members of Muslim society are known to be "overpowering" in their demands that women cover themselves. To quote an example from one of the dictionary items YOU linked to of oppression: "a tyrannical parent".

Adnan Siddiqi wrote:

That means, if I force you not to wear underwear, it means i am being unjust with you.

That is correct. If you force me not to wear underwear then you are being, not only, unjust, but also you are oppressing my desire to wear underwear. You are humiliating me.

Wajeeha wrote:

HELP HELP URGENTLY!!!!

You might want to stick your head in a crocodile.

If Islam is a "religion of peace" as I am being told every day then (1) Why are there any Muslims in prison in the first place and (2) Why are there Muslim gangs in prison. According to the article "Prison officers at one of Britain's maximum security jails are losing control to Muslim gangs... staff believe a 'serious incident is imminent' as several wings become dominated by Muslim prisoners." http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/may/25/prisonsandprobation.ukcrime[^]

Senu Gandhi wrote:

Pls rate my answer if it is working well

It is rude to solicit votes.

Say something useful dammit! Don't post rubbish like that constantly.

Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:

Are there any threats or issues with that?

The wrath of the community

Magh_M wrote:

Query doubt.

You have a question, not a doubt.

kumarjammula wrote:

I had small doubt

You mean you have a question, not a doubt.

peshkunta wrote:

Wow...that's such a simple thing and noone here know how to do it.

I think there are many people here who know how to do it.

peshkunta wrote:

All the security settings are in the registry, I don't see why it would be so hard for someone who knows.

Yes, that is easy, but access is restricted from the sandbox of an ActiveX control. For reasons that have been clearly explained to you.

peshkunta wrote:

I think those webBrowser objects are useless if you can't change the settings of your own browswer object, from your own app. Come on guys that's ridiculous.

No it isn't - And you know it!

peshkunta wrote:

Can a sound programmer please answer my question.

A sound programmer would refuse to answer such a question.

Table Adapters are evil.

You said: "I don't care what you do" I replied that you obviously do (care what I do), otherwise you wouldn't keep replying to me.

Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote:

I think you have some problem, cosult doctor.

I'm not the one with the problem. You are the one voting everything down. I only voted down on invitation.

Obviously you do. Otherwise you wouldn't continue to reply.

Happy now? Isn't being childish so wonderful :~ X|

Actually, I haven't been. However, if you'd like I can vote you down for your last few posts?

Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote:

You can't comment

Oh, we're back to that old chestnut. I can comment. I can comment on anything I like. You don't have to agree. But as I'm the one that is interpreting your words I am uniquely placed to comment on them. I am the only person on this earth that can tell you how I interpret your words. I can extrapolate and suggest that others are likely to interpret them in the same way.

Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote:

I would suggest you should get it clarified rather then trying to improve others style of writting

If I spent all my time clarifing other people's words nothing would ever get done. If you write effectively then I won't have to clarify anything.

Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote:

This site is being visited by users groups situated in various countries

Absolutely, so it the writer would stick to generally held standards and conventions then we would all get along much better. Any I notice that you appear to be voting people down again... :sigh: