Hey! That's how we keep our machines running sweetly: WD40 and duct tape; the world just wouldn't turn without it. :laugh:
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Hey! That's how we keep our machines running sweetly: WD40 and duct tape; the world just wouldn't turn without it. :laugh:
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
You can using skype or facetime
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
hen you can't get a new battery without replacing the entire phone it should be bloody obvious you are being ripped off. Talk about built in obsolescence.
Can't fault you there. Glad I got rid of my iPhone and got an Android phone instead.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
On my machine (self built) the Ctrl Alt Delete combination is implemented at a very low level as I can reboot the computer by pressing Ctrl Alt Delete during the POST test.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Got to admit, you're not wrong with that sentiment.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
If you really want to see where these emails lead, set up a virtual machine running xp or something similar and open them in that. Doesn't matter what they try and do then, just delete the virtual hard disk and start again. That's what I do.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
You might be right come to think of it. Whichever it was, a few more of his kind should be sent there.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Nick Leeson? I thought he was still banged up in a Thai jail. So, come to think of it, should all the other bankers that ruined the world economy.:mad:
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
Well, if we take carbon and burn together with oxygen from the atmosphere it creates the same amount in molecules of CO2 as the amount of O2 it uses.
Ok. I can understand that. So, if we are converting 02 to CO2 by burning fossil fuels and the like, and we, as a species, are reducing the amount of oxygen generating plant life (deforestation) are we not in danger of suffocating ourselves? Or are there other ways in which atmospheric oxygen is generated? My point is, are we not in danger of suffocation long before climate change makes the planet unbearable?
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
It is. It's a bummer to put right if you realise you've made a mistake as well. Why oh why our lecturer had to tell us about it I don't know. Even the inventors peers didn't think much to it either!! http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/members/bshneiderman/nsd/rejection_letter.pdf
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Gregory.Gadow wrote:
ne of the reasons getting old sucks is that we still remember when the world seemed big and shiny and new.
And more pleasant.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
Of course it does. Any parent knows that if they buy any form of sweet, their children will appropriate them for themselves.
I can vouch for that. I never get to see any of the chocolate/sweets that enter out house. :sigh:
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Reminds me of my two kids! :laugh:
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
Could someone explain something to me please.
Erudite__Eric wrote:
We have added about 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere since preindustrial times.
If that is the case then - and here's the question - has the Earth's atmosphere increased in volume; i'e is it thicker now than it used to be OR has the composition of the atmosphere changed; i'e has the amount of oxygen/nitrogen reduced as the amount of C02 has increased? This is something that has had me pondering for a long while.
Why can't I find a signature that I can stick with? Are they all gone?
To be honest, I never could see the point in NS-diagrams; it all looked to tedious to me - even worse when you had to put it into practice. I sometimes wonder if college lecturers throw this sort of stuff in just for a laugh. Flow diagrams, now they do make sense when trying to capture the essence of what one is trying to do.
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.
That is gross!
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.
You still cant beat the actual physical book.
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.
So there I am reading some of my old college assignments when I came across one on programming; in particular pseudo programming. One of the things that was drummed into us was that you do not code a single line until you have done the pseudo programming. OK, I can go with that, makes sense after all. However, which pseudo programming "language" to use? So, to the title of this question: does anyone still use the Nassi - Shneiderman pseudo programming technique? Notice I changed this to technique, I don't think it could, even remotely, be called a "language". For those of you who've never heard of Nassi - Shneiderman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassi%E2%80%93Shneiderman_diagram[^]
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
0. Since when is United Kingdom a nationality? It's British, just as it should be Hungarian not Hungary, German not Germany or Usian not USA. Get it right, use the demonym!
British should be banned as a nationality! I'm from England and I'm English, ask a man from Wales if they are Welsh or British; I bet they say Welsh. I would bet a Scotsman would say he's Scottish and not British as well. There is no meaning to the word British any more other than to say we come from a particular land mass which is what Britain is; England, Wales and Scotland.
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.
Maybe we should ask for an irony emoticon
You do trust me, don't you? If any love is good lovin, why is prostitution illegal?? I guess I ain't seen nothing yet.