I'm not sure what you're asking for exactly. But, I did have problems with "murky sound" a good while ago, when I had my old SoundBlaster X-Fi (USB) hooked up in such a way that it went through a USB2 connection rather than USB3. Changing connections so I knew (for sure) it was going through USB3 fixed the problem. Which makes very little sense, since the device itself predates USB3. I rather strongly suspect this is because it went through a long chain of hub going through hub going through hub, and USB2 perhaps couldn't carry the amount of data from all devices that were all competing for bandwidth. In other words: Try hooking up your G431 headset so it goes through a shorter USB3 path...?

I don't install any "preview" updates. My home network's WSUS server nightly cleanup script automatically disapproves them as well.

Thanx for REM reminder. Forgot about that one. As to your AI view, I agree. "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

sure: i'm having fresh made soy milk with my own secret recipe of various Thai/Indian spices baked with melted coconut palm sugar with heaps of butter. i'd send you some, but, the unprocessed hard cakes of the sugar reeking of spices might look suspicious. :omg: «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

my turn just for fun apropos of nothing just something i wrote long ago re/ a particular subject matter . shown Crick and Watson as meteors through the stars did they come from Mars ? the old rule of thumb to have the best DNA choose your parents well reproduce the same bacteria people alike first unzip their genes

trønderen wrote: When you listen to music, the subjective experience is what counts. Fair enough. trønderen wrote: People crank up the sound level in their cars to make the music sound better. ...and to drown out the engine and wind noises, etc. trønderen wrote: Stated briefly: "Fidelity" hasn't been a sales point for 25 years. It is purely a measurement & analysis concept. I'm not gonna disagree with anything you wrote. :thumbsup:

Ron Anders wrote: I couldn't find diddly poo of any depth on SO when I began work on Microsoft Graph. I wonder if this is a quick judgement made too rapidly. SO does have a learning curve and doesn't have a warm welcome mat for newcomers. «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

as someone who often writes/uses (excretes ?) many mutant words in 5/7/5's day and night, i am gobsmacked i didn't see that immediately ! can i plead insomnia, syredd. amd meds ? thanks, bill «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

Well, I don't really care! :) I don't use Bing Chat or Google Chrome and I only use Edge, maybe, once a month (damn financial website that ONLY works with Edge).

Thanks, Harold, okay ... for you sparse matrix; for me, node/edge Object graph. harold aptroot wrote: make the overall matrix responsible for maintaining that invariant, not the edges. I'm going to implement that and see how it might work. i hate the idea of removing and readding event handlers. more ? in a while :) «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

Rich Shealer wrote: I tend to need to hear their voice before I can have a level of confidence...She remembers the fine details that make up a face, me not so much unless I really, really, know it. Mild prosopagnosia is already known in study participants. I suspect given normal human distribution curves that it is far higher than known.

I agree. Very fortunate. He was Genius. Many moons ago (late 1970's and early 1980's, if memory serves), I implemented Warnock's hidden line elimination algorithm in a program at Grad school. It was designed to process very large CAD images with extreme detail using dynamic overlays and adaptive image partitioning (3D quad trees with pseudo recursion, written in Fortran). It ran on a Data General Eclipse mini-computer (and later on VAX under VMS). There is an example of the hidden line output used by Richard Feynman in his book "What do you care what other people think?" Pg, 159. "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

They also have a history of saying no to humans who have solved the same problem and attempt to provide the solution to open questions.

I would prefer the second one as it completely hides IA from C (which mostly I would want when I setting up like this). This also suggests me that the 1st implementation is for scenarios where you don't want to hide and be much more explicit about who is asking to implement (also IB is mostly playing middlemen for some reason known/unknown). Latest CodeProject post: Quick look into Machine Learning workflow How to solve Word Ladder Problem? To read all my blog posts, visit: Learn by Insight...