Maybe some VB fanatic trying to show what hell could be unleashed using VB to make people stop mocking it. You. Never. Know.

Sweeney Todd, the beginning.

???? ???????? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ? ??? ? ? ?. ??? ? ? ? ? ?????? ? ??????????? ???????? ?. ????? ???? ?? ? ? ??? ???? ???? ? ? ? ??????? ??? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????. ?? ???? ? ? ? ??? ? ? ? ?????? ? ? ? ? ?????? ? ? ????? ?? ? ????? ???? ??????. ???? ???? ? ??????? Alert from <> : You may not have the necessary font installed. Please install it to read the message. To find out the font that is needed, please google a line or phrase from the text.

"You know Abdul is going out with a bombshell these days?"

#define short long

So is Hot Girl Sam.

The anchor says that it is wrong for people to demand what they are demanding. The people demanding think it is wrong for Ellen Degeneres to be representing that company because she is gay. What's the difference? These kinds of debates that are based solely on opinions are a massive waste of time. We have quite a few of those (albeit other topics) on Indian TV too but I watch it for pure entertainment.

Bazinga.

It isn't nessary to be pissed off at such trivel things.

Blood. Sometimes it sets my teeth on edge, other times it helps me control the chaos...

I know the feeling. I recently had my team leader changed.

"CP is down?" "why CP is not loading?" "plz answer why cp is not coming in my screen?" "send me links for cp" ... Poor yahoo qna.

I hope you wrote a script thingie to do that. Else, puppy shame.

What was going on? The backroom patrons staged "occupy codeproject server room" kinda shit ?

I one voted an article because I thought it was bad but then realized the author had made references to the shortcomings. The references were hard to spot earlier. Anyway, since I couldn't take back the vote, I changed it to a three. I would have preferred to cancel the vote because that didn't deserve any up votes.

Dalek Dave wrote:

Firstly that a single question mark is suffice, anything more is both redundant and inelegant.

Really ????

Ra-one wrote:

IN PRISON.......You have unlimited time to read e-mail jokes.
AT WORK........You get fired if you get caught.

This point alone is sufficient to favor workplace. Every other inconvenience is forgiven.

Manfred R. Bihy wrote:

I hope not!

Aah, yes. I now see why not!

Manfred R. Bihy wrote:

but then OP should have used an enumeration instead of strings.

the text might be coming from user, who knows, so converting text to enums and checking against the enums would be additional no value added steps for the simple scenario. But without proper context, the code seems alright.

Not a shame IMO. Having a bunch of if-else or a switch-case setup is the simplest and most straight forward to do this for five to six cases. The conditionals could be moved inside the constructor to make the code more readable though.

The best way to work (as in really work) from home is to find a proper place to work. I mean, if you use your couch or dining table to work also, then you are sure to be distracted, and not just by your family. I am more productive at workplace so I rarely work from home. But whenever I did, I chose to work in my dad's office room.