I have noticed an article recently, where an image was lifted directly from another party site. SQL 2012 - Newly Introduced Date and Time Functions[^] image link http://www.sqlsentry.net/performance-advisor/screen-slides/images/slides/performance-advisor-alwayson-slide.jpg[^] How should such instances be reported?

I've done it again. I wrote an article, but apparently I used too few words. Question to the moderators and reviewers, since when quantity trumpets quality? Things that used to take us hundreds of lines of code, became one-liners, which do not require elaborate explanation or walk-through. So why are the reviewers stuck in the mindset that more words is better? Darek

If you think the US will go from close to $700B to less than $50B this year ... you have another thing coming.

What did you get? And why did you make that choice?