This isn't deserving of Wat. +5. Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^] -Or- A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]

Bah, I've got bits that are older than that. :suss:

Did you click the search button or the web search button? When I click the search button on here, I get no results. [WikiLeaks Cablegate Cables]

Dalek Dave wrote: You do know you have to allow for the Julian/Gregorian date shift in that range don't you? Huh??? The only shift I'm aware of is when the year "1" occured. That ain't anywhere near the 21st century range. (Should be year 0 but they didn't give the power of 0 that we do today.) Anyway, how does a date that uses the same calendar settings end up shifting?

Why... still I don't know, but for sure something will come out from the new project I'm assigned... surely something will work only in my head and not in this strange db-friendly language used by oracle... hence, surely it sucks but for unknown reasons till now :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Christian Graus wrote: If it happened once, then was fine the second time, that's called an intermittent problem, which is just harder to test for, but it WILL happen to the client. ...except when he tries to demonstrate it to you.:mad: Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

I once knew a developer named Atul...