djj55 wrote:
Do they make a DVR that is not subscription dependent?
Electron Shepherd
Posts
-
VCRs - luddite rant! -
Don't know if you looked at this...Rosendo Lopez wrote:
Dear hamsters, you don't do this type of storage do you?
Well, CP offers an "email your password if you forget it" option, so the actual password, not just a hash, must be stored somewhere. Encrypted we hope, but still stored in a retrievable form.
-
3rd party control library IE9 support suspiciously absentI can sort of understand the control manufactures reluctance. IE9 is a big change, and it's still in beta. Releasing official support for a beta product can lead to a lot of support problems, since when the beta changes, and then breaks your released product, you now have a lot of customer shouting at you, since your product now doesn't work.
-
More confused than a Norfolk WeddingYou may want to edit the title of your post. Not becuase you beat me to the news, but Google indexes CP very quickly, and Chris won't apreciate i****t being associated with his web site in search listings.
-
Showbiz NewsDr Who is marrying his own daughter, who is also the daughter of his previous self and Trillian. No, really...[^]
-
Customers are idiotsBut surely, if I only had one printing system, installing the software on that one system would be a sensible thing to do. If that doesn't have a negative effect on the performance of that system, why would installing the software say, three times, on three independant printing systems affect the performance of each system? The single database scheme may not work in all cases anyway. They may have remote sites connected via low-bandwidth links, there may be departmental politics issues where one department isn't permitted to see stats from another department etc, etc.
-
Gerry Rafferty RIP -
Names of cities/towns -
Edited to honor posting rules.Matt Gullett wrote:
If there's a better forum to post this in, please let me know
You should probably read the Code Project Job Board FAQ[^]
-
XKCD OTD - it's so trueWell, HDMI 1.4 is talking at just over 10Gbit/s, which is pretty rapid. Cable quality will affect the digital signal, especially over longer runs. At HD frame rates, you can't really resend corrupted data - you just display what you have, and that will manifest as artifacts and incorrect colours on the screen. It will appear to be just like a low-quality analogue signal. Having said that, £135 for this[^] is pure snake oil.
-
do women likes beau beads bracelet ?Rob Philpott wrote:
a thing for removing hard skin from the feet which is captured in some sort of built in container. Don't know what its called
A cheese-grater glued to a soup bowl?
-
free skype alternatives?Joan Murt wrote:
today I've not been able to log in and become connected to their servers
Looks like it's a one-off issue. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12064394[^]
-
Is science just a new religion ?Dalek Dave wrote:
REPEAL OHMS LAW
I must offer some resistance to this idea!
-
Would a Game dev degree be worth it?True, a lot of "game development" these days is graphics work and scripting the game engine that you buy, but if you to do the low level stuff, go and work for the game engine company, not the game publishing company.
-
CCC 22/12/10 [modified] -
Style CopRob Philpott wrote:
I don't know why it's the standard
I'm not asking why it's the standard where you are. You seem to like it as a naming convention. What I'm asking is why you like it. Why do you think it's better than the others? I may have misinterpreted your opinion of course. You may dislike it as much as I do...
-
Style CopNot really. It still doesn't explain why it's the standard in the first place. That's what I'm trying to userstand. Lots of people use camel case as a naming standard, but no-one seems able to say why it's better than the others. So, if you were tasked with developing a set of coding standards, and you decided to use camel case for variables, would you be explain to someone the benefits of that over an MFC-style
str...
or C-stylelpsz...
convention? -
Style CopRob Philpott wrote:
But that's not a justification for using camel case
Rob Philpott wrote:
It absolutely is.
No, it's a justification for using a standard. It's not a justifcation for selecting camel case as that standard. Your point about "You can tell at a glance what you're dealing with (local/member/property etc). And if we all do things the same way it makes it easier to understand each other's code." are entirely valid, and I agree with them, but they apply just as much to Hungarian notation as camel case.
-
Style CopRob Philpott wrote:
Who knows? The point is convention.
And that's my point. All you're saying is that being consistent is good, and being able to identify scope from name is good. But that's not a justification for using camel case. I've never seen a good reason why it's "better" than other naming standards, and I think it's worse. My deliberately chosen example is something that is conventionally called a number, but in the real world is very ofen a mixture of letters and numbers, and so has to be represented as a string. Using the camel case standard, you somethings can't infer data type from the name, which to me seems a backward step.
-
Style CopSince you like it, what's the rationale for starting just the first word with a lower case letter? Why is
customerAccountNumber
better thanCustomerAccountNumber
orstrCustomerAccountNumber
orlpszCustomerAccountNumber
?