Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:
Shouldn't the compiler be a little more proactively smart enough to throw out a little warning at least w.r.t. context-sensitiveness?
How should he possibly do that? Best solution I can come up with is providing a Math.PolarToCartesian function...
return new Vector3(r * (float)Math.Cos(theta), r * (float)Math.Sign(theta), z);
And I thought I was safe from typos using a strongly-typed language.. :doh: Took me hours to figure this one out.
So you don't know the VB.NET syntax and think VB sucks because it doesn't compile C syntax?
Yeah, that one's great ;) I've just came across someone in StudiVZ (german copy of Facebook) who wrote on his page: Hobbies: Listen to music, Twitter, Watching movies These social networks are getting really important in people's life :D
Do you know of some cool blogs or other interesting websites about coding or related topics? I only know of Coding Horror, but there have to be tons of awesome pages out there worth to read them, huh?
Wow awesome! :O
Not sure about Google but MS is supposedly allowing businesses to use their own servers. I think Azure will be along these lines too, if not immediately.
Then the situation is different, of course. But is there such a complex technology behind Google Docs? I mean storing documents on a server is not such a difficult task, or is it? The important thing is more like the idea.
Kevin McFarlane wrote:
As a consumer my policy is that I don't store anything in Google's "cloud" that would be a disaster if it were compromised.
Full ack!
I cannot unterstand how a company can rely on Google Docs? Cloud computing is a great idea, but storing company data on a foreign server, where you cannot verify the backup and protection? I also find the people paranoid how think that Google is the evil company who stores everyone's data and does bad things with it. But I would be more careful with company data.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPIw3cv8Zls[^] Have a look for parkour on youtube, that's what they do (without the effects, of course)..
I have an SQL CE database which I am binding to a ListBox via ItemsSource = Database.Table. Works fine. If I add an item to the database (using InsertOnSubmit, is that right?), the ListBox does not get updated - a known fact, I found out. But how can I refresh the ListBox?
Mohammad Dayyan wrote:
Do know any references about it ?
http://www.hookedonlinq.com/LINQtoSQL5MinuteOverview.ashx[^]
The moment we entered the foreach loop (that’s important, the SQL was only executed the first time we requested data, until then the query was just kept in-memory as an expression, this is called Deferred Execution), the following SQL Statement was formulated by LINQ and executed on the server.
Mohammad Dayyan wrote:
if so, what's your suggest for estimating a LINQ query time ?
Maybe it's enough to get the first element of the result and do nothing with it to execute the query..
But I think LINQ queries are not executed until you somehow access the result like foreaching over it or something like that. So you have to include that into the measurement.
I want to let the user define the columns for the database, so I have one table which contains all column names, one table which contains the row ids and one table which contains the values (and references to row and column). How can I display data like that in a DataGrid? I somehow need to get to the cell with a certain column..
You have to create an Xps document in memory in order to print it.
Well, negative margin does work, but not the way I want it to do this.. With a negative margin, a control can even be displayed anywhere out of its parent! I want the control to be cut off at the border of its parent.. How can you do this?
just type is:unread in the search field or use http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/6885[^]
A SkipIterator (internal, System.Core.dll) is created.. You can look at it in Reflector.
Read the error message, use objectbrowser
known problem with your pc/network card or router?
Well, I just discovered the index service :D (why is it disabled by default???) and found out, my search is really, really super fast now. So I'm happy with windows search (the xp one, I mean).