Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
E

Erion Pici

@Erion Pici
About
Posts
4
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • I hate Javascript....
    E Erion Pici

    Power is nothing without control... Javascript is very useful. Get yourself a manual, so you can control it.

    The Lounge csharp c++ javascript html question

  • I Hate Clever Javascript Programmers [modified]
    E Erion Pici

    I agree. Although inline IFs are useful, that code looks as bad as it would look in the more traditional IF { } block form. I'm not convinced it's been generated by an obfuscator though.

    The Weird and The Wonderful javascript question

  • I Hate Clever Javascript Programmers [modified]
    E Erion Pici

    If you work your head around inline IFs you'll find them really useful. I use them in C# all the time!!

    The Weird and The Wonderful javascript question

  • My first rant in a long time...
    E Erion Pici

    Johnny J. wrote:

    And now, everybody's doing precisely that. And if that's not enough, all companies have their OWN understanding of how the object oriented structure and the layering should look and feel. And the developers want everybody to know that they understand the latest technologiest so they throw in every new hype they can think of even when it's completely unnecessary. I hate it. It's a major misunderstanding. I know I'm going to get downvoted for this, but that can't be helped.

    I definitely agree with this - although I love technology myself and like to experiment on new things.

    Johnny J. wrote:

    The codebase is growing, because not even the developers that did it in the first place can keep track of everything, so duplicate objects, properties and methods are constantly written because noone knows that they exist already. And of course, noone can clean it up either because after some time noone knows what is dead code and what code actually serves a purpose.

    It's obvious that the developers haven't cared - or haven't been encouraged to - document their code as they wrote it. You can't expect to keep track of everything in an OOP architecture without proper documentation.

    Johnny J. wrote:

    And the system is slow as hell, and it's growing slower each days as more users use it and more data is added to the system.

    If you keep going like this, you will have to bin the whole thing and start from scratch, using clear requirements and development strategies to achieve their accomplishment. Writing documentation as you develop is crucial to complex systems like the one you mention.

    Johnny J. wrote:

    I have a task for you: Can anyone give me ONE example where layered code has proved to be a major advantage? I'm not talking about hypothetics like "Oh, what if we have to change to another type of database?" crap, because that is never going to happen in 99.9% of systems. Give me an example where someone has actually leaned back at a meeting and calmly said: "THANK GOD that we broke all the foobar code out in a separate foobar layer!" I challenge you - you can't.

    Just think of SOA. As a result of proper layer separation you can make systems which use different technologies interoperate and achieve very complex results. Think of an Enterprise Service Bus (like th

    The Lounge question csharp wcf oop tutorial
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups