I guess, to modify the code could bring into effect... Plus, to check/uncheck the option may be implemented by an API function, for it seems like a block.. Stroking five times can activate the dialog, is there some service on guard? So if to configure something can make the dialog inactive all along? -- modified at 10:15 Monday 21st November, 2005

Great! Full and clear!! Thank you very much!!! :laugh:

:laugh::laugh: What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.

Well, I had tried WinKey+L but nothing had happened to my computer : ) Thanks

Yeah! C++ is very fun and it is abundant in perfect thinking!

:) it is not very good for the soud souds off and on, interrupted Is it better if uninterrupted ?

Hi Now I can access to CMOS registers by device driver. Only a pity is that the century value is not very right. For the data read from 0x32 register is not the realtime value. Thanks for your attention!

Now the varable can get its right value. Maybe something is wrong with my VC6,isn't it? Thanks!

Earl Allen wrote: My question - How do you know your disconnected computer won't do something evil when it is reconnected to your network? My answer It never is. More accurately, I have a Ghost Image of a known clean configuration, which I restore to a drive, put stuff on for testing/checking, then restore again to wipe all traces of whatever it was. After all, the last thing I need is any kind of virus/worm infection.... Steve S

Thanks you very much! :rose::rose::rose:

Now I know about them to some extent. Thank you!

Great! What a good lesson! I don't know what to do about these errors before. Thanks a lot for both of you! :rose::rose::rose:

The following sentence can work well for your the last five sentences. tm.GetAsSystemTime(sysTime) :)

I have a try. Thank you!!!

All those codes are valid when performing a debug build, do you think so? Does they work like: 1.Define "new" by "DEBUG_NEW" when detecting the building mode is debug Is that to say, "new" will always be replaced with "DEBUG_NEW", I think, DEBUG_NEW maybe contains some extra error checking codes, isn't it? 2.#undef THIS_FILE. Is it to avoid conflicting with the later same name or THIS_FILE is something to be used in a release build and it can't be used in a debug build? 3.why use "THIS_FILE[]" to substitute "THIS_FILE", can we use "THIS_FILE" directly? In the meantime, I have not see THIS_FILE[] used in another place

Thank you all!

You're welcome :) Aleon666 wrote: Today is valentine's day for our chinese people Will you send some presents to your lover if he/she is in China Nope, she's in Australia :) Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"