And then you phone the person 11:30 at night? :confused: I have a similar problem with birthdays. Even though I may technically know the birthday if asked for it, I still don't think of it at the exact day.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Do you really think someone nose what the word means without looking it up? :)
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
In German we use "ausfüllen" for forms, which in principle means close the gaps so that it's completely filled in the end.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
That's just copy & paste, i.e. code duplication. Object reuse would have been to link to the post containing this "picture". ;P
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
I would do the check in stages. For the piecesOnGoal you only need the count, not the individual numbers. So start like this:
int piecesOnGoal = 0, piecesOnBase = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
if (piecePositions[i] > 50)
piecesOnGoal++;
else if (piecePositions[i] < 4)
piecesOnBase++;
}
// If pieces on base and in goal don't add up to 4, return false.
// If pieces on base is 4, rturn true.
for (int i = 0; i < piecesOnGoal; i++)
{
// Check here that piecePositions contains an element 54 - i.
// if there is none, return false.
}
return true;
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
I see a reason for the function but not for the switch statement. Except if you are paid by lines of code of course. :-D
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Reminds me of a (very) old joke from the text book used in my English class. "My dog has no nose." "How does it smell?" "Terrible!"
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
If I understand you correctly, you do a change in the main resource of the project but don't compile it. Then you manually propagate the change to the satellite assemblies. This means your satellite assemblies contain strings that are not in the main assembly. I assume that this is the problem leading to the exception. And if you compile the project again, so that the main assembly matches the satellite assemblies again, it will work. If this is what's happening, I think the behavior is by design.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
F-ES Sitecore wrote:
... read yesterday's hand over notes to myself ...
Do you really do this? :omg:
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
I have read a slightly different version here in which the boy flew with his mother. And she also had a contingency plan for if the "N" was reached, in which case they both would identify as "Zulu".
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
I assume that the CFileDialog object contains a handle to the directory once it's opened and that the handle is freed when the dialog object is destroyed. You could try the following:
CFileDialog * dialog = new CFileDialog(true);
dialog->DoModal();
delete dialog;
RecursiveDelete("F:");
Alternatively you could try:
{
CFileDialog dialog(true);
dialog.DoModal();
}
RecursiveDelete("F:");
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
My favourite always was "The Time Thief" (or whatever the original English title is (I have it in German)), although admittedly I haven't read all the books. And I'm also a fan of the Death character.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Reminds me of the selfies with tigers I read about some time ago. Consider especially the second-to-last paragraph. :-D
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Obligatory XKCD
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
You may want to think about that statement again, considering that IDE means Integrated Development Environment. :-D
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Albert was told the correct month. So if he was told August, he couldn't say that he knows. That he can say confidently at the end that he knows the date, can only mean he was told July (assuming of course neither of the two was lying).
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
And, at the risk of being redundantly redundant: What about those people about whom it is said "He's good for nothing".
No one is good for nothing. He can always be used as a bad example. :-D
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
I tried that once with I think it was Citrix. And it even worked, althouh it looked strange. I could then in the remote remote session disconnect the original remote session, which deactivated the whole construct. :-D
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
Sascha Lefèvre wrote:
It's supposed to somehow (don't ask me) help with fixing code that is vulnerable to SQL-injection.
After reading the actual questions, I don't think he is trying to fix the actual vulnerability with his code. Instead he may be trying to cheat the test system (by obfuscation) from detecting that there is an SQL injection vulnerability.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
VS 6.0 had the much more useful option: Enable copy without selection. One of the first things I did after each installation was switching off this option. This way I was protected from almost all accidental copying. I was quite mad when I discovered they changed the option to only apply to empty lines in later versions. :mad: I don't even bother to change the setting nowadays, because most of the time when I want to paste, the cursor is on a non-empty line making the option worthless to me.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.