jochance wrote: Yes, I do want you out I respect you for that. jochance wrote: Actually, folks with that mindset can all hit the heliosphere. Sheep always wish the wolves be out. But without sheep, a wolf is a problem, innit? Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Its not waiting for an object, its pausing itself until the timeout period elapse or the release signal is received. I think it should just be called wait(). Wait one implies that it waits until the supplied thread is released which is not what happens.

As a professional, I don't think that matters. When Hostinger was notified of the problem they should have started the repair. Instead they stood around wringing their hands. Gus Gustafson

It appears that FireFox does not render the page correctly for printing. Can you try it with another browser? "Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."

I just clicked on the QA menu and this is what happened: [image: bd6f0001-d4c7-4bfb-9a07-77e222438d2d.png] I am sure that I have never selected Blazor anywhere.

For the last years, Microsoft supported Win 7. I think the problem with failing to save settings was Logitech self-inflicted. I don't know how they did it. I just know what I said in the original post. Gus Gustafson

It may have been lost in last weekend's forced rollback. I've been getting the same problem for a couple of days. "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

I agree. There is a vast difference between "coders", "programmers" and "analyst programmers". Coders write code to fulfill the complete specification that are given. Sometimes they given the basic code to enter. Programmers have the ability to flesh out less well defined specification by getting answers to the undefined parts of the specification. Analyst programmers read and question the specification they have been to ensure that the specification meet, and will resolve, the problem for which the specification was written. In addition, consideration has be given to the working environment and management of the project. I have worked in organisations in which management not only dictated the specifications for the features or issues, they also dictated the time estimates to complete the feature or resolve the issue. This environment makes it very difficult to raise questions or even make changes to obvious issues.

Nice! :thumbsup: Chris Maunder wrote: If the articles are tagged correctly There's always an if, isn't it? :) Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

I've emailed Chris separately a document that includes seven examples of problems. I am awaiting his response. Gus Gustafson

We do not explicitly dumb down the code. If there is a valid reason, i.e. mostly performance, to use more modern language construct, we will use it. if there's no reason for it, then you must demonstrate how it will make our life better. I'd rather be phishing!

Come on. Table can easily be made responsive through clever CSS classes on its rows and columns. If you were to move say a column in next row, all you need is a not so little JS function which can basically rewrite HTML based on screen size. See how easy it is. Now where is "let me write a senseless solution while pretending to be serious and genius" icon? "It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[^]

Gus, You've entered a bunch of HTML tags in the content of your message and our forum system interprets HTML tags as, well, HTML (and has since we started CodeProject) unless you check "Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML". I've edited your message and ticked this box. We also added support for Markdown[^]. Your message had the "Use Markdown formatting" box ticked as well which was causing the paragraphs to be numbered. I unticked this box. Your concerns 1. I'll talk to Sean about the image issue. Did he provide you any guidance or explanation of what went wrong our end? 2. Can you please send me the original HTML you were attempting to post directly? I'll see what was happening with the HTML parser. I'm surprised an ending tag was removed. I've not seen that before. 3. We don't support coloursing code within PRE blocks. This isn't a bug, it's a style decision. cheers Chris Maunder

Took me a while (oddly) for this error to reproduce itself but I see it now and we're on it. Thanks for the report, Gus. cheers Chris Maunder

Correct Gus Gustafson

Regardless, these are examples of questions/answers that I have provided. On a couple of occasions other CP members have suggested that I move a Q/A to the solution. When so suggested I have done so. But that doesn't lessen the need for formatting in the Q/A input. Gus Gustafson

gggustafson wrote: That's a lot! I don't know. My dog's lost 7 in the past 3 months or so (with everybody in town wrapped round her little finger and giving her treats she needed to, she's not ill!)

I also use DYN DNS, and it is fast and reliable, I also use DigitalOcean for hosting, and are a perfect pair for each other.

Well, to me that name sounds like one of those ripoff programs that Mr Gustafson has encountered. Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello