You might wanna try something in the lines of RewriteRule ^([^/?]+/)*index.php(\?.*)?$ $1 [NC,QSA,L]. This will rewrite all the index.php to folder/?whatever. You will probably need to play with it a little as I didn't have time to thouroughly check it. :)

Hi dear you can let div#useicon stay block level but you must change a to block level and then float the div#useicon for gain width and height. and that work in all IE versions. here the css code: a { display:block; width:16px; height:16px; overflow:hidden; } div#useicon { width:16px; height:16px; float:left; } I used overflow for get arount collapse height because of floating div#useicon.

Thanks, it's working great. Do you have any suggestions on what I can do on the receiving end? I don't want to create a file and I don't want to allocate an entire buffer for the image either. Is there any way I can receive in chunks and still be able to display the whole thing at the end? Sometimes the image gets quite large (>10mb) and I don't want excessive memory usage. edit: nevermind. it's working now. thanks for all your help! modified on Sunday, May 23, 2010 12:28 PM

May be the analyzing of the stack before the call will help... :) virtual void BeHappy() = 0;

Oh, I should've said this in my first post - I'm injecting this dll into selected processes, so the event that has to trigger a dialog box in my app could or could not happen and I don't know when it will happen. Hope that helps? :)

Start the command directly but use pipes to redirect it's output. See this[^] article for details. As for telling when the program is done use the process HANDLE returned in the LPPROCESS_INFORMATION structure passed to CreateProcess. A process HANDLE can be passed to one of wait functions such as WaitForSingleObject because it becomes signalled when the process has finished executing. Also note that a common mistake made by people is not to close the process and thread HANDLEs when they're done with them (or not at all). Use GetExitCodeProcess to retrieve the return code. Steve

Yes, I've been exploring that and I think I can continue from here. Thanks a lot for your help Baltoro! :-D

You could check $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'] - that should give you the URI of the page that referred to the image, as long as the user's browser doesn't have referrer sending switched off.

hxhl95 wrote: since when the hooked function is reached, calls to GetCurrentProcessId will only return the pID of the caller, not Process A you could use GetProcessId()[^]. nave [My Articles] [My Blog]

hxhl95 wrote: If it changes anything, this is all happening in a seperate thread, started by a call to AfxBeginThread inside a WH_KEYBOARD_LL callback function. But that shouldn't make a difference, should it? Introducing multiple threads will always make a difference. Race conditions, sharing of resources, deadlocks, and context switches are just some of the things that come into play above and beyond the normal stuff. "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

Edit: Ridiculously stupid post was here. Ignore it. Please. I did NOT write something that stupid. Apparently I fail at reading documentation. Problem solved now, thanks a lot. :) modified on Friday, November 6, 2009 8:49 PM

Ha, that reminds me of the movie Pi. If I remember correctly, he was trying to come up with an algorithm that could predict stock market behavior (or maybe that was another movie). Anyway, yeah, that's a good idea. The more general form: using computers to scour data to determine if the typical qualities actually indicate desired results. You might apply this to other fields as well. For example, if you can get your hands on a list of criminals and attributes about them, you might correlate violent behavior with certain parental structures (although, not sure if that type of data is available to the public). Something to consider is if there is something you would like to predict (the result of a horse race, if a person is going to commit a crime). Just need to make sure you can find something with available data or where the data can be created in a short enough duration (within a few months). DABBee wrote: your life savings (10 maybe 20 bucks) Hey, that's nothing to scoff at. I'm currently several thousand dollars in debt, so my life savings is actually in the negative. Visual Studio is an excellent GUIIDE.

hxhl95 wrote: but I can't reply to two threads with a single reply.. You can make a reply pointing to the other one's address... (sorry for the bad pun) :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought GetModuleBaseName returns an error code instead of the length of the string copied. I assumed the 0 it returned meant success :doh: That explains the garbage data. EDIT: I checked GetLastError, it's returning an invalid handle error. :wtf: Might this be because I'm getting the handle from NtTerminateProcess? modified on Saturday, March 21, 2009 2:37 PM

The forum that I gave you the link to seems to say something about replacing explorer.exe, but I haven't went very in depth with that and it sounds like it might cause quite a few problems. How many bytes of text have I typed in my lifetime??? Man, I wish I kept track...

I just found out that NtSetSystemPowerState returns STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED in NT 4.0. Now I'm wondering if it's implemented in 5.1 and above. I know for a fact that it's in Vista though. :laugh: All my calls to NtSetSystemPowerState have been returning 0xC00000EF. STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED is 0xC0000002. If my research is correct, 0xC00000EF is NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_1 :( Anyone have clues regarding the parameters? I can't find any calls to it inside anything. modified on Saturday, March 14, 2009 6:53 PM

I'm probably going with this idea. Thanks a lot. :-D :-D

:omg: I'm surprised I didn't find that. Thanks a lot :-D

Now I just feel stupid. :doh: Thanks. :)