You're welcome :)

I was browsing around for this problem and found the following post (don't know if it's reliable): http://www.icodefactory.com/lab/post/UAC-Revealed-7e-elevation-of-rights-from-NET-as-commonly-misunderstood.aspx[^] I still think that even if this is true it should be possible to use the Windows API to somehow elevate the process, but I am not sure.

You're welcome :)

Excellent answer. :thumbsup: The more anger towards the past you carry in your heart, the less capable you are of loving in the present. My Blog![^]

No problem. We ran into this issue 2 year ago when we were considering moving from XP to Vista and had 1,000 apps to test. We quickly found out that there's nothing out there that can look at every app and tell you, definitively, which apps were going to work and which were going to fail, let alone how they were going to fail. There's a few thing to look at. The first is if you're going to enable UAC and at which level. The next is how your applications are going to react in a more restricted environment and how those problems are going to be mitigated. The results of some of this testing may affect the outcome of turning on UAC! The third thing to look at is the installers for your apps. Depending on your deployment environment, your apps may not even install correctly. We found a 40-50% failure rate in our installers alone. Most of those problems were easily resolved by either retiring the app if it was no longer needed, making only simple modifications to the installers, upgrading the app to a newer version, or using App-V to run the app. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

Let me verify it, I will get back to you..

The only point i can see of making the different layers into exe's is if they're running as a service and you want to have one point (bottleneck?) of entry. This would naturally be the case if the client resides on one box while the server (tierobject) resides on another. That doesn't mean there won't be dlls involved for the interfaces between the layers though. "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams

Was my question clear enough or can this not be done? Not a critical question, just curious if it could be done. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

Just inquiring if anyone has any ideas to test with this? still stuck and not sure what to do. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

1. Technically No. Although if the distributor is in the same server, there'll be the inevitable resource waits. The publisher DB transactions themselves are not delayed per se, but the underlying resource contention can delay the transaction as a whole. Queuing is managed by the distributor. The publisher actually does nothing. The distributor will monitor the DB log of the publisher and replicate those changes to the subscribers. If the distributor is located in a separate physical server, there wouldn't be any waits. 2. Nope SG Aham Brahmasmi!

Roger that Eddy. Thanks for the suggestion. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

Something like this (pseudocode): Class Watcher Private System.IO.FileSystemWatcher Private Bool IsPaused Private Queue Public Sub Pause() IsPaused = true End Sub Public Sub UnPause() While Queue is not empty ProcessFSWEvent(next item in queue) IsPaused = false End Sub Private Sub FileSystemWatcherEventHandler(sender, eventargs) If IsPaused Then Add eventargs to Queue Else ProcessFSWEvent(eventargs) End Sub Private Sub ProcessFSWEvent(eventargs) Do whatever you'd normally do with the event End Sub Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

Sure Ashfield (thanks for reminding me to do so). I found this thread on another site. It got me pretty close to what I'm trying to do, just modifying to my needs. "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

That did it. Thanks Dave! "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

Roger that gold leader. Let me go looking into datatriggers. Thanks! "There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison

Sounds to me that you mistakenly took your dog to your car mechanic. m.bergman -- For Bruce Schneier, quanta only have one state : afraid.

We have similar issues in our office. The main issue I have with our heating/AC system, though, is that it's not really an integrated system - there are vents in the office ceiling that emit hot or cold air, heating/cooling the office gradually. As I sit pretty much underneath one of those vents, I tend to get hot air or cold air blown on me all day. Unless I turn the thing off! Admittedly, the ambient temperature is only around 75-80F at the moment, so turning the AC off isn't really a heinous crime here :-) Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p