Once again you are demonstrating you have no idea what you are talking about.

Henry Minute wrote:

The correct punishment is/was a drive through, which was administered and accepted.

That's absolutely incorrect

Henry Minute wrote:

As far as overtaking the safety car is concerned, I have no doubt that you, of course, were aware of the correct procedure when the safety car is still in the pit-lane but I wasn't and I doubt that Hamilton was either. Because of that uncertainty he took a chance. He was wrong. He was punished. He still came second

He finished second just because he broke the rules, as always. I don't give a shit whether you realized aboutthe correct procedure, but for sure Lewis was very aware of that and he did it anyway

Henry Minute wrote:

Take no notice of the whinging of Alonso, he finished where he deserved to finish with a car that despite showing great promise and improvement is still not quite there yet

No comment - This shows you haven't got the foggiest idea

I'm sorry too, but you have no idea what you are talking about. I can say many things on what this guy did in the past, but today he manipulated the race to get second (with the support of Charlie Witting). We all know that you can not overtake the safety car,but he did it and he did not get the penalty he deserved And things like that happened too often in the past and will keep happening in the future And please, do not mention the names of Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso together with Lewis Hamilton.

Lewis Hamilton keeps proving my theory that he is one of the dirtiest drivers in F1 history. And the worst thing is that all his actions are always supported by the corrupted FIA

Dan Neely wrote:

Have one of these Beer

I've drunk enough beers these last few days, but I'll have another one, no problem

Dan Neely wrote:

Even if you managed to poison the crack for a day or two the old file would be quickly replaced and most of the software theifs wouldn't ever actaully buy a copy anyway

I know for sure that those guys we have installed the cracked version will never buy the software In any case, we have no plans on poisoning any of our apps, not even cracked versions

Mark Wallace wrote:

It doesn't matter whether or not you've been paid for software; if you go out of your way to "knowingly and willfully" disable anything on someone's machine, you're trouble bound -- getting paid for what is installed on the machine is a separate matter, in law.

The point is that what is installed on the machine is an illegal software. It's the user who installed the software who is breaking the law, together with those sites who are hosting (and even promoting) illegal software Thanks for your comments anyway

Mark Wallace wrote:

Steady! It was said as a joke, might be illegal, and would certainly alienate users.

Illegal? Is it illegal to upload a proper, legal software with the hope to replace an illegal, cracked version?

Mark Wallace wrote:

Look at it this way; who is more likely to buy your software, someone who has tried it out and likes it, or someone who has tried it out and liked it until you ****ed with their computer?

I dont't get this one. Our software can be tried for free so that if someone likes it, he will have the opportunity to buy it. And what do you mean in this context with 'until you ****ed with their computer? ' ? Am I doing anything wrong with uploading a legal software?

Thanks, I will try this out Carlos

I have recently found out that our software has been cracked and can be downloaded and installed from hotfile and warezcentre.org This is causing us a lot of troubles, specially in China where our distributors find very hard to promote our software when many people can easily install the cracked version for free Has anyone faced a similar problem before? Any advice on the best way to take these cracks off from these sites? Cheers, Carlos

Hi, I'm considering the possibility of starting up a small company in the States (while living in another country). Does anyone have a rough idea about the costs for creation (notarized act), yearly taxes, etc? Thanks!

Hamilton is an idiot

DaTxomin wrote:

McLaren has been blatenly pushing Hamilton at the expense of Alonso all season

Wow, you must be kidding! Hamilton was taking all the season advantage from Fernando's knowledge on how to tune a F1 car. And McLaren never, ever supported Fernando, but the other way round. Do you remember what happened in Hungary? Hamilton behaved like a bad-mannered boy, to say the least. He's not a bad driver, though not a special one. Next year, when Fernando will be out of McLaren (hopefully), you will see the real power of Hamilton & McLaren

Paul Watson wrote:

Guess other teams will think twice about doing something similar in the future.

Well, they have done it many times in the past, in special Ferrari. Anyway, this is an intrinsic part of this pseudo-sport Cheers, Carlos

Basketball of course

spain is the real dream team! The match hasn't finished yet but I can say they will win the championship ;) :-D;):-D;)

I'm very sorry for Landis and for cycling in general, but I’m happy that a guy from my region will be the new winner of the Tour de France. I really doubt that there is a mistake in the analysis. 99.9% of the counter analysis confirm the first results, yet you never know ...

Congratulations!! I think France performed better tonight, but Italy does also deserve this victory. I can't believe what Zidane has done

Athletics, Cycling, Basket

Michael Martin wrote:

if you can't see that it's because your head is wedged too far up your boyfriends arse.

You're a bad looser :mad:

I have to say that the penalty existed.

Not a tutorial but a great book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/007226182X/qid=1121823742/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/002-3111892-2648814?v=glance&s=books[^]