Rocky Moore wrote: BTW, your domain might also fit good for a consultant group. Yeah, there are a bunch of different tech related topics that domain could be used for. I agree with you though. They were bought with a purpose (not just to sit there) so why not keep them until time finds me or a friend, and something gets made of them. Levi Rosol Blog By Levi[^]

AFAIK, they're a good company. They better be good, they're so expensive! Just make sure you test your code carefully before going live. Bugs in a credit card processing script can become a huge problem! Carl Mercier Geek entrepreneurs, visit my blog! [^]

IBM T42P -> Pentium M -> 1.8 Ghz -> 1.5 GB RAM -> 70 GB HDD -> Actual screen res: 1600x1200 (God send for VS.net!!) -> Windows 2003 server ~ $2800USD about 6 months ago ... (btw price does not reflect s/w manifest)

Roger Wright wrote: Exactly. If the site is really that bad, why do 1.6 million people want instant access to it? The site is outstanding! It's the load times that suck. However, they are managable. Generally when i need CP, i open it, then i switch back to MSDN for a couple min, then back to CP and click a link, then back to MSDN, rinse and repeat... my suggestion for some sort of open source project would not be a silver bullet by any means. If it's the CA network causing slow times, then obviously finding a new host would be another upgrade. I was more curious as to what other people thought of the idea more than anything. Levi Rosol Blog By Levi[^]