Good one!:-D:-D:-D:laugh::laugh::laugh:;);):);P:->:-O

V. wrote:

I'm not sure how anyone can do such a thing:

I am sure one must not do such a thing.

Hamed Mosavi wrote:

and does thought-wars mean the argu/discussion after a comment?

Hey! I meant that only. You are clever!:-D

Prinz Ryoiji wrote:

programming tutorials?

hey! what kind of programming tutorials? CP already contains a big stuff of articles. What type of tutorials do you want?

This is not an attack!:)

Hamed Mosavi wrote:

Hope you don't mind too much, if I made a mistake and I don't be bombarded with a sudden attack.

Hamed Mosavi wrote:

I'm too afraid to post this, since I have 11*1 in my last post

First of all this is a forum, and whatever we write may be commented... either by 1 or 100! The attack is (or atleast it should be) on the idea/concept, and not on the person who has written it. Such thought-wars bring great revolution. So keep on posting. Happy posting!

Cool it :cool::):-D:laugh:;);P:^):-O:rolleyes:

Oh! What I meant is that my membership is since 4th May 2006, for over a month and not just for 5 days as you said.

Okey! If money is the major matter then ... can't comment!

RahulGeek wrote:

But once you are over the hump of learning a new language (C#) or a new flavor of an old language (VB.Net), and stop missing good old C++, the differences between 2003 and 2005 are not that devastating.

I think I need to update myself before commenting on this! Anyways thanx to all.

Okey! If money is the major matter then ... can't comment!

Does anybody guess why Microsoft releases new versions of Visual Studio (like VS2003, VS2005)? Why not create updates to the existing release? Or in other words, Java also does update the technology but does not call for revolutionery changes. Then why VS does it? (Or tell me if I am wrong)

Does anybody guess why Microsoft releases new versions of Visual Studio (like VS2003, VS2005)? Why not create updates to the existing release? Or in other words, Java also does update the technology but does not call for revolutionery changes. Then why VS does it? (Or tell me if I am wrong)

The solution provided by r.stropek is good. Basically I surprise, why do you maintain 50 tables of same structure?:confused: Can you not combine all the 50 tables into one table (with one additional column as TableName or Type or Category or anything like that)? (r.stropek suggests to do this through a view.) I guess combining tables will solve maintenance problem, and help normalization too!

toxcct wrote:

you'll get your bronze medal soon.

I will wait for that day to come!:-D. But I suppose when you said this

toxcct wrote:

but you're there from only 5 days

you saw only dd part :-O(and not dd/mm/yyyy) in the following Member since Thursday 4th May, 2006 anyways thanks for the reply. Bye

Well just to avoid some confusion (might be I m confusing myself!) I have posted 21 messages but still no medal is shown. Then what about that bronze at the beginning?!:confused: