Probably true. I've only seen it once before though, so that's all I can comment on. My current favourite word is: Delicious! -SK Genius Game Programming articles start -here[^]-

Yes. I was thinking in turning some libraries into dlls. I'm not friend of having an app of one .exe and lots of .dll, but sometimes there aren't other options. Best regards, Mauro.

This makes sense, of course, but I have always thought that it would be really cool to have a "smart" = operator that, depending on context, is either comparison or assignment; a dedicated := assignment operator for when you're returning the result of an assignment; and a dedicated == operator for when you really want to compare. That way, you won't get bit, but you can have C's power if you need it. I'm not sure why no languages I've seen have this.

Thanks Toxcct 4 answering. Can you explain me more detailed? Imagine I have a C function named myfunc in test1.c Then test1.lib will contain the module test1.obj that contains the _myfunc public symbol. On the other side, another function with the same name but in test2.lib When I link the app with test1.lib and test2.lib the linker gives an error in test2.lib(test2.obj) because _myfunc is already defined in test1.lib(test1.obj) I didn't find to hide test1.obj from the visibility of test2.obj, no matters if it is inside a .lib Best regards, Mauro.

Hi, He wrote in his site to contact him by email or any can found him on codeproject's lounge and I was unsure if I post the message in other forum he would see it. It was a simple choice and my intention was not to offend anyone. Best regards, Mauro.

Yes, use the link in the article which advises you how to report bad articles!