On clothing: Remove before washing. "Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit..." "There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

MikMit wrote: Am I the only one? No, definitely not. MikMit wrote: I actually hear of professors telling their programming students not to worry about code efficiency because the the hardware has so much capacity now. They will make fine Windows operating system programmers.

Indexors don't have to use sequential numbering, though that's probably what you saw in the example, you can do anything with the index and the value once you have them. The index doesn't even have to be number. But if you want another alternative you could declare a struct with a long and a string and have that be the Type of your property. No other options come to mind but good luck. topcoderjax - Remember, Google is your friend. Try this Custom Google Code Search