Pete O'Hanlon wrote: It'll be the same behaviour as with a Windows Forms app. I just tried the same block of code in .Net 2.0, and that's correct; it copied the file to my hard drive as well. Pete O'Hanlon wrote: It sounds like you are performing the copy on the primary thread, which blocks the UI until it completes the operation. The only thing that confuses me is that I don't have any code to perform the copy in my project; when the user presses the Open button on the OpenFileDialog, it is copied over automatically without any extra code. Thanks, Mitch

I figured out the solution. I created another column in my DataTable that is being tied to my ListView, and I bound the chk Checkbox to that column. Now, in order to get the value of checked or not, I can just retrieve the item from the DataTable and it'll output True or False. Here's my new XAML code: <ListView Margin="151.2,30,123.8,8" Name="lvSongs" ItemsSource="{Binding}" SelectionMode="Extended"> <ListView.View> <GridView x:Name="gridViewSongs"> <GridViewColumn x:Name="chkColSongs"> <GridViewColumn.CellTemplate> <DataTemplate x:Name="chkCol"> <CheckBox Name="chk" IsChecked="{Binding Checked}" /> </DataTemplate> </GridViewColumn.CellTemplate> <CheckBox x:Name="chkHeader"></CheckBox> </GridViewColumn> <GridViewColumn Header="Song Name" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Name}" Width="110"/> <GridViewColumn Header="Artist" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Artist}" Width="125"/> <GridViewColumn Header="Album" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Album}" Width="200"/> <GridViewColumn Header="File Size (MB)" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Size}" Width="100"/> </GridView> </ListView.View> </ListView> :) Thanks.

That's exactly my issue. So, is there any way around this, or is it something I'll just have to live with if I don't want to spend lots of money on an assembly-encryption application? Thanks, Mitch

TaskManager ais about the worst tool you can use to see how much memory your app is using. Why?? This is because TaskManager isn't showing you the memory your app is using. It's showing you how much memory is reserved by the .NET CLR Virtual Machine that is running your app. If your app releases managed memory back to the runtime, the runtime holds onto it (as seen by TaskManager) because it's not being released back to Windows. The runtime holds onto it to fill future requests for memory by your application faster. If Windows needs the memory back, the .NET CLR will release any it memorys it has in reserve back to Windows. If you really want to see how much memory your app is using, use the Performance Monitor and the .NET CLR counters to monitor your app. Task Manager isn't show you how much memory your app is REALLY using. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic      2006, 2007

You're welcome. Glad to help out. It seems that WaitForInputIdle() applies only to process with a UI but there may also be other conditions which cause it to return false. You might want to consider uisng the WaitForInputIdle(Int32) overload since the version you are calling has the potential to wait forever. Also, if for some reason the process doesn't have a message loop, both overloads will immediately return false, so you might want to test the return value as well. Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. —Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

I have another small update to make. Inside my Click event handler, I can change the stylesheet by using, style.Href = nString imgLogo.Src = nImg , it just seems like Internet Explorer is refusing to let me set the cookie when I have the WWW in the URL. Is there a setting that I am forgetting to set? Thanks, Mitch

Great, thanks for the reply. I wasn't sure how Windows would handle two separate read requests at the same time. Thanks, Mitch

Welcome fellow sufferer! I have that problem with my DVB-S card, too.... Don't try it, just do it! ;-)

Yeah sure: fdksd;lf k;lds ;lsdkas; ;lkasd l;kpoi2qpei23eopi opi0-12834p1o ikq;lko;e[-po234=-ol ][sad#;da'#;da#'; #a's'# ;#as'a ; Blogless

The ME-50 has an unbalanced preamp out so, yes, you could use it as a Mic preamp. The better the soundcard, the better the sound. Depending on what type of recording you're looking after, you might want to get a better audio card. Check out www.echoaudio.com[^].

Mitch (Programmer2k4) wrote: In my C++ DLL I need to pass an "HWND" value to an SDK function; however, when I use "AfxGetApp()->m_pMainWnd" the compiler returns two errors: In Continuation With Mr Arend, you need a window in DLL too, as there by default no window present in DLL, So AfxGetApp() function is of no use! "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow cheers, Alok Gupta

Jack Squirrel wrote: using svnadmin + hotcopy the point of using hotcopy is that in backing up an active service, you must first establish the current "state" of the database. This can be done by locking out all users, or locking states, file by file durin the copy procedure. Although this doesn't truly apply to the subversion or CVS when in a "client only mode" -- it assumes you know what you are doing. In otherwords if you submit a change in client (local) mode only at the same time as simultaneously backing up the source tree -- you will achieve the exact same state of "unknown" for every file backed up. So, yes, you can backup and restore the files easily in client-only mode, as long as you do not try actually using the client at the same time. You being the only user, that is easy. The subversion service does not have that same guarentee, thus "hotcopy". [edit: at least that is my understanding... anyone is free to correct me.] _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

Really though.. it depends upon the price they want to charge... I MIGHT be willing to pay 100 per year for a subscription as long as it gets me technical supoprt, all upgrades, etc... It all comes down to price. [EDIT] Ok, Maybe not ALL down to price. The question then comes up as to MY abillity to stay at a level (not have to keep upgrading my os) that I want to be at. {/EDIT] George Carlin wrote: "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the asshole constant will be an integral part of that theory. My Blog[^]

Tune in next monday for another funny episode of Wasted HTML... :laugh::laugh::laugh: /matthias I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. [Douglas Adams]

jan larsen wrote: I agree that the STL is more powerfull, but I find the templates awkward to use. I think that the generics in 2.0 are way easier to handle. i'm not sure about that. i didn't have the chance to use them but from what i read it is not possible to do something like this: public static T Sum(List<T> list) { T sum=0; for(int i=0;i < list.Count;i++) sum+=list[i]; return sum; } because nonconstrained types are treated as Objects, and they don't provide + operator. you have to mess with all sorts of workarounds, providing interfaces for simply adding two objects (not necessary numbers). also, the syntax for defining type constraints in generics is, IMHO, horrible and mostly redundant. having to write this: class Something<T> where T: new() { .... } look like a joke to me jan larsen wrote: Yeah, but the important word to remember is Standard. Why is it better to use std::list intstead of JanLarsen::list if it's not important that I use JanLarsen::hashtable instead of the non-existant std::hashtable? i agree with you on this 200%

Programmer2k4 wrote: How do I make sure that the article stays on the CodeProject and no one else copies my work and says it is their own? As Chris said, you own the copyright. There is a copyright notice at the bottom of the page. However, it has been known on the odd occasion for someone's article to appear somewhere else. Vigilant CP members will often report to the author if they saw the article somewhere else to help fight copyright infringement. (It's a great community here!) And something I've started to do is to write at the bottom of the article exactly where you will find authorised versions of the article. For example, at the bottom of my most recent article (http://www.codeproject.com/cs/database/SqlInjectionAttacks.asp[^]) is a separate copyright notice and a list of sites where you will find the article. In this case it is here on Code Project, Scottish Developers and my blog. So, if a CP member recognises my work somewhere else they can see if I intended to publish it there or not. Also, If I ever want to do anything with an article I find on Code Project I always ask the author permission through the article's message board and I always attribute other's work. My: Blog | Photos | Next SQL Presentation WDevs.com - Open Source Code Hosting, Blogs, FTP, Mail and More

http://example.com[^] Yeah, doesn't work when you copy & paste link... still, one click is not so big deal Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.) David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy

That is because the KeyValue return int. [C++] public: __property int get_KeyValue(); Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio