"Start with the first screen" was the best way to create a big, bold, and messy amount of spaghetti code developing under MS-DOS. I lived it a few times before I learned how to create structured code less hard to be understandable and updatable, until I switch to OOP, and that makes my life easier. Have you tried to invite your stakeholder to drink any beers out of office? This may enhance a lot your communication with him. In the other hand, why not the first screen is the logon screen? And the second screen is the main menu screen? After that you can work defining the users and security screen, and perhaps your boss will be more willing to cooperate when he sees your progress.

I don't like that messenger starts automatically and you haven't an option to disable this behavior. That's very uncomfortable when I check the mail in my job X|

Turbo Pascal 3.0 on 1987, when I was on the last year of high school :cool:

Personally I think that Jules Verne books and Isaac Asimov books and essays are still a must for everyone who have an inner joy for science :cool:

Rigth, you can do your app without follow best practices. Even you can do it without follow any practice at all. But, unless the app would be for your personal use, or you're the company owner, you can't be absolutely sure that somebody else should have to modify your code one day. And regardless if you or someone else will modify the app after, it's a good thing to use a practice instead of do the things at fly, or in spaghetti style, because although you delay more time to do the app today, you could be saving to shoot your feet in the future. In other hand, if setting the title of 'senior' to every developer could make them good developers, that will solve all the development issues in the IT world ;P . P.D.: The first lesson of a good teacher is that he NOT always is right.

You want to end every line of text with a semicolon (;), without matter if you're writing T-SQL, HTML, Visual Basic, a letter, an email, or anything else :-D

Thanks for your suggestion Dan, but I can't enable hibernation due to my beautiful profile restrictions.

Thanks alot for your time and good will. But I haven't more information at glance. And yes, you're right, in other companies McAfee works pretty fine. Maybe I misunderstanding this item, and is just about someone who wants to give us a good, necessary, and forced coffe time. And that's the reason why nobody has made the effort to solve it.

It seems that happen only on 1 of every 3 workstations. It means 300 of 900 employees.

That's the kind of reputation that get who persistently complain about the same item in this company. I should think in a B plan.

Man, would be fantastic if you build it. I'm sure that alot of people around the world will really preciated it.

It should be a good option if the powersupply could be reliable. But unfortunately it isn't. Many times I've tried to do so, finding the pc turned off the next morning. I'm still thinking on move me to another company.

It's the enterprise edition of McAfee X|

I live in Mexico City. But the funniest is in which company I work. It is the biggest insurance broker of the world, however they can't have a realiable & trustworthy 24 Hrs per day - 365 days per year powersupply :laugh:

It should be a good option, if the powersupply could be reliable. But unfortunately it isn't.

It should be a good option, if the powersupply could be reliable. But unfortunately it isn't.

Every day, when I turn on the pc in my work, I have to wait between 15 and 40 minutes to start working, and all because intermittently mcshield.exe process uses 100% of the CPU!!! For restrictions on my profile I can't disable or at least change the process priority. In the manufacturer's website (everyone knows who is it), there is not even one choice to make a complaint about it, and our infrastructure departament says that I'm an isolated and irrelevant case, being that this happens to many of us. I'm starting to consider seriously as a good option to change of company :((

What about this two? - I don't like this source control because isn't friendly to use, and I have had problems with it in past. - I don't know how to use source control, cause always I've working alone in every project. Amazing, don't you? :laugh:

Have you consider use jQuery? It would make you easier the management of the DOM with js, and it's cross browser compatible :)

Why we have to be worried about the browser when there are amazings 3rd part components fully cross browser compatible? Since I use one of them, I only have to think about which browser would runs faster the apps, instead of think about an app could run in different browsers. :-D