Nitin S wrote: there was indian section on cp It was closed down years ago, if I remember correctly. This remains an English language site.

While I share the same outlook on 'AI' (it's LLM for :elephant:'s sake) I would urge you to consider what thousands of dollars of hardware could do in 1996 versus what a $300 smartphone can do now. GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next

charlieg wrote: go back to the original post. I read all of them. No clarity from that to answer my question. Certainly the original disaster designation for a 'fire' was something that cities had been dealing with for centuries. Back then, far as I have seen, every city was a potential fire bomb just waiting to go off. The follow on legislation specifically added storms. For which this fits. Storms of course vary by location but it is certainly true that Gulf states experience hurricanes and midwest states experience tornadoes. And many places experience snow storms. And of course floods. All of those have existed for a very long time. So back to my original question - are none of them disasters? So the legislation should have never existed in the first place? Or there is some specific recent even that you accept is a disaster and as such would qualify for Federal designation?

I would say you're almost definitely looking at some Python. Tons of other languages *could* be used, but it seems like everything ML/AI is Python. Trying to do anything in the important guts of the latest AI/ML boom that isn't Python is fighting an uphill battle, at least for now. Even if you are way more competent at some other language, there just aren't the plethora of examples and things for AI/ML that there are in Python. It makes it easier to stumble through learning Python than to try to replace wheels with whatever you might prefer. The people who understand matrix math hate semicolons and are apparently mad geniuses or something because they think whitespace has any business mattering. If you want example, maybe look for NMKD tools and their Discord. I believe they mostly wraps C# UI around things... WPF maybe. You might be more interested in the Python under the hood of all that (which is also open source but not really related to NMKD). The NMKD tools I've used were mostly Python under the hood and invoking stuff on Python environments it runs somewhat transparently in the background. They seem like UIs whose point is to GUI the CLI so it isn't daunting, esoteric, and cumbersome for "power users". Since it's involving video and AI uh... there's weird stuff there. But their tools and what they do are pretty solid fare. I have used/toyed with them for about a year now. There are several people in that Discord who understand things about video transcoding which I don't even know exist and I've written some professional code to convert video before.

asp.net chatbot - Google Search[^] First result: Adding a Self Hosted Chatbot to an ASP.NET Website[^] "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

My take on it was that with Blazer, you can make client side apps sort of like Angular, in which you can type your client side code in c# instead of JavaScript or TypeScript, and a Blazer utility sort of like Babel will translate your c# code into current and backwards compatible JavaScript, and automatically insert it into the server side generated HTML, and transmit it back to the client. This reminds of .Net MVC, in which you can add React client and server via NuGet packages, and write react modules to insert on Razor pages, in which Babel will translate the React module into JavaScript and integrate into the server generated HTML and send the page to the client. So instead of client generating React JavaScript, it's done on the server side, so that .Net can keep track of it. Babel is a translator, that can generate backwards compatible JavaScript from ECMAScript 2015+ [What is Babel? · Babel](https://babeljs.io/docs/en/) So in my mind from what I read of it, Blazer is sort of like ReactJS using Babel, or AngularJS in which you can create a single page application SPA within a single Razor page all in c# without the steep learning curve of ReactJS or AngularJS. If it ain't broke don't fix it Discover my world at jkirkerx.com

Ankurm/ wrote: Sorry for a very late reply. I was away from CP for quite long. So am I Ankurm/ wrote: And I think that broke the links on your signature too. :D That was intentional. But later I'm going update with actual links, lets see. Be safe man! We'll chat again in FB later. thatraja Coming soon1 | Coming soon2 | Coming soon3New

AFAIK, there is no free alternative; it would be rather expensive to maintain a network like that and open it up for free. Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

ok want to delete the post only. will post in [Bugs and Suggestions](https://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx) ===================================================== The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence

Why not start with the Xamarin documentation? The examples and documentation are very good. This space for rent

trying hands on angular 6 ===================================================== The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence

I'll get to that next week to see what you mean, and if my project build is correct. But thanks for the heads up on that. If it ain't broke don't fix it Discover my world at jkirkerx.com

You won't probably seeing much of an ASP.NET MVC project with Angular, but you can find some using ASP.NET Core with Angular. For example: GitHub - RickStrahl/AlbumViewerVNext at NETCORE21[^] ASP.NET Core as back-end and Angular as front-end SPA.

Well, it was a long time ago, but I cut my teeth in .NET with Jeffrey Richter's book (CLR via C# or whatever it is these days). Not long after that I did the .NET brainbench and scored so well that someone in a hedge fund noticed and called me out the blue to work for them, which I did. Brilliant book, so that's what I recommend. The tests have no doubt moved on, but as I recall .NET was pretty easy in comparison to the C# one. Regards, Rob Philpott.

I'm not joking at all, I do not need psychiatric, All I am worried right now is finding next job after notice period finishes... Thanks, Nitin ===================================================== The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence

Methinks you tell porkie pies: the clue is in the title of your post... Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

Nitin Sawant wrote: While going to some place do you ever select longest route? Oh that depends. There are many factors which I usually consider when choosing a route. While the distance usually has the biggest impact on that choice there are also many others to consider. Like: How fast can I travel on that route, am I travalling by car, foot, train, etc? If so which one is more/less appropriate for the means I'm travelling with etc., what are the costs needed? You may cross a lake with a ferry or drive around for less money. I guess you get my idea :) But tell me then: How is middle clicking longer than left clicking? it's just another button on my mouse ;) The functionality of opening things in the same or a new tab/window is already in basically every browser so there shouldn't be any need of opening things in a new tab. Oh, and by using another mouse button I'm in control of what's happening too. Why would you want to take that choice away from the user? If it was opening in a new tab by default I wouldn't have that choice anymore... Just because it might be more convenient for you doesn't mean it has to be for every other person out there. I for one (and probably many others) like it better the way it is, and it doesn't take me any effort to open it in a new tab if I'd wish to do so.

Nitin Sawant wrote: Einstein searches the net He must be shit at Google I found hundreds of copies of this joke when I searched.