Genau, das macht spass! I guess it was just coincidence in this case. And, don't worry about your English, surely it is much better than my Deutsch! :) Matt Gerrans

Hello everyboy, I didn't thought that my question effected so much response. But now I know there's no common license system for CP posted source code. And I got the mention, that I better have to ask author before I use his source in commercial products ;-) I wanted to clarify that fact. Before I illegally use code, I would ask the author, of course. Thanx for replyments, very good community here :-) Norman-Timo

Hello and thanx! The Redirect without the boolean-parameter doesn't work too. But that was not the problem :-) I shot a own goal with the fact, that I held my Session data in a class variable. So a reference to the session was always held. And so I think ASP.NET doesn't performed my Session.Abandon(). After a Response-Redirect the reference was still active, so I didn't gave ASP.NET a chance to make the Session abandonded. X| Ok, now I solved the problem, because first I destroyed every reference to the session data. So on, Norman-Timo

So I tested a second way: I invoked the endless loop with one browser client of local system. Another client on another system (then browser will not accepted from webservice) tried to invoke another WebMethod out of my Service, and failed! I think it´s definetivly that my WebService don´t run in threads! And another suspecious point: After invoking once the endless loop, all later requests on my WebService fails, equal if the current request was aborted from clientside! He hangs in endless loop and only a reboot of the system will end this! I´m Very disappointed now :sigh: Ciao Norman-Timo

Does really no one knows something about my problem? *PushThreadForward* Ciao Norman-Timo

Hi leppie! Sorry! I forgot the InvokeMember statement It should be: object retObject = MyClass.InvokeMember("MyStaticMethod", System.Reflection.BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, null, ?X?, parameters); And why should this not work? Ok I tried with both Flags, but ths won´t work, too! But my error was much more simple, I detected that my MyClass was 'null' because I forgot the namespace to find my 'MyClass' --> 'Namespace.MyClass'. But why he didn´t throw an error, I don´t know! Thx therefore Leppie, explain why I should make it with your solution? Is it faster? Ciao Norman-Timo

Hey thanx! But in my case (I forgot to write this!) I only want to communicate with a static partner. And in my case the communication should never be disconnected, and there is only one case if connection fails: socket error. Only if I start my application I bind the socket to my IPEndpoint and set the Socket to Listen and wait for this client response. After client is responsing the connection is hold and should never end. But there are many reasons why the connection breaks: perhaps the cable was disconnected, or the comm. partner has to reboot..... But nothing helps, so I understand, I have to test the communication and send a "null" package after every certain timespan. Ok thanx to all Your Norman-Timo

Use the methods as given in the Array base class, or access it via the "Item" property. top secret xacc-ide 0.0.1

I´m very sorry, but this is not working too! I really don´t understand the second parameter? What sense does it make? I always found this method with second parameter is null! Hey, but I found the solution at another forum: int arrLength = (int) p.GetValue(testInfo.GetValue(testInvoke), null); This is the soltion. My problem was the wrong object for the first parameter! So now I can go on with my work. ;-) Anyway thanx a lot for your help @leppie! Norman-Timo

Thank´s for your reply! But this is the first thing I tried! I only get an exception that the target object does not match :-( I tried every object which is thinkable but alway´s the exception. Maybe there´s another (nicer) way to get the array length? But the Method 'GetValue(obj,null)' does not work! Maybe somone has another idea of getting the arrayLength via reflection??? Please answer Norman-Timo

Are you trying to load a different version of the same assembly? If so, if you havn't strong named the assmebly the CLR class loader will disregard the version number of the assembly. To perform this operation safely so you don't have to deal with file locking, take a look at AppDomain.ShadowCopyFiles as this is implemented by fusion and also used in ASP.NET. At least load the assembly into it's own AppDomain which will allow you to safely unload the AppDomain when you are done with the assembly. - Nick Parker My Blog | My Articles