I saw that last night. Pretty amazing - especially the applications of being able to do such a thing :omg: Cheers, Tom Archer Author, Inside C# A total abstainer is one who abstains from everything but abstention, and especially from inactivity in the affairs of others.

I know you can use setsockopt to set the send and receive timeouts, but is there any way to set the connection timeout? This isn't really a winsock question but more a common sockets question, isn't it? If setsockopt works, why do you want to find another way to do it? Maybe there is some obscure WSA* function to do it, but why bother? /Mike

Thanks for that! I'd never have found that. Cheers, Peter

LOL :) Didn't think it would be a base class CWnd function. Thanks! Cheers, Peter

Check it out...http://www.rinkworks.com/dialect/dialectp.cgi?dialect=cockney&url=http://www.sonardyne.co.uk/products/7828.htm ;) Andy Metcalfe - Sonardyne International Ltd (andy.metcalfe@lineone.net) http://www.resorg.co.uk "I used to be a medieval re-enactor, but I'm (nearly) alright now..."

Hey, stop trying to poke our friend in the eyes! :mad:

I agree with you, but most of the time there *IS* an index file, giving the name and offset of each separate resource in the master file. Sometimes this index is embedded in the master file itself, at the beginning or at the end, sometimes it has been generated as a header file, and is included in the software itself. So, I think only changing the size of one of the embedded file should often fail, you'll have to locate the index file and modify it too. If it's in the exe... it becomes really really difficult. Best regards, Mythos Frederic My (Mythos)

Hi, You are right: LCC-Win32 can make very small programs, but this is because its C-run-time is smaller than visual-c's However, Visual C can optimize much better than LCC-Win32, so you will reach a point when VisualC is making smaller programs than LCC once your program's source get bigger. By the way, I regularly create 2Kb programs in Visual C, by removing the C-run-time and using pure WinAPI instead. Look for an article by Matt Pietrek on MSDN magazine, Janurary 2001, entitled "Under the hood". This is an update of the original October 1996 October 1996 by Matt, when it appeared in MSJ magazine. Here's the link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/01/hood/hood0101.asp James.

Just found it. MAC: CR UNIX: LF DOS: CRLF Cheers, Peter

some dot net version of sql server is in the make and on its way ;)

ooh - nasty! :( cheers, Chris Maunder

You can't distribute them at all, since your beta license agreement doesn't allow it. You *CAN* use it for things like in-house server products that don't go out to customers (just the output of the program does).

Hi, Thanks for the information - I notice that Matt Gullett also posted an article on using this type of algorithm in spell checkers, so I'll have a look around. Regards, Peter