Thanks for the idea with the Circle Line. I actually did the monopoly route on Saturday. I was wrecked but I can say I held down all 26 drinks which is surprising for a lightweight like me. I don't remember the last few though. Cost around £80 for the day but I did more sight seeing that day than I have done in the my 3 month stay so far. Rick Eastes. http://www.eastes.net

Gday All, I'm curious to hear if any other Code Projectians have attempted to complete the 26pub pub crawl in London? Rich. Rick Eastes. http://www.eastes.net http://www.ezyedit.com

If you generally distribute your apps over the internet, .NET is severly limiting your potential market due to the 22MB .net framework download. I agree that EVENTUALLY, everyone will have the framework installed, but untill then, would you download a 22.1MB application or a 100Kb application? Rick Eastes. http://www.eastes.net

This is a huge problem with .NET If you're a small company and generally don't distribute your apps on CD, .NET is severly limiting your potential market. I've managed to compile C++ 6.0 using Studio.NET and the final exe does not require the 22MB framework but I have been unsuccessful with VB.net I agree that EVENTUALLY, everyone will have the framework installed, but untill then, would you download a 22.1MB application or a 100Kb application? Rick Eastes. http://www.eastes.net

This is a huge problem with .NET If you're a small company and generally don't distribute your apps on CD, .NET is severly limiting your potential market. I've managed to compile C++ 6.0 using Studio.NET and the final exe does not require the 22MB framework but I have been unsuccessful with VB.net I agree that EVENTUALLY, everyone will have the framework installed, but untill then, would you download a 22.1MB application or a 100Kb application? Rick Eastes. http://www.eastes.net

I too am finding the same problems as "theorion16" I don't necessarily agree that we should put up with a 1MB distributable when we can do the same reliably with a 100K distributable. Especially if dealing with certain apps that are widely distributed via the net/email etc... I am in the process of finding a way to link a VC.NET app to older MFC DLL's. Will post results when found. Rick Eastes. ------------

My MFC application compiles successfully in both VC++7.0 and VC++6.0 but I feel I have wasted my time and money buying VC++7.0 WHY? I need to have a small distributable. Here are two senarios: 1. Compile with .NET Need MFC70.dll which most computers don't have. 2. Compile with VC6 Runs on ALL computers without ANY additional dll's :mad:Surely there is a way using .NET to make the exe link to old dll's like MFC42.DLL and not new ones like MFC70.DLL Rick Eastes. ------------ http://www.eastes.net

Obviously. However, the .net framework (20MB) is certainly not small. I don't want to distribute this dll when mfc42.dll would be fine. Rick Eastes. ------------

When I compile my application using VC++ 6.0, my app requires MFC42.DLL, while if compiled with VC++.net, is requires MFC70.DLL Is there a way to compile using .net AND forcing it to link to MFC42.DLL and not MFC70.DLL ??? :confused:PLEASE help. Rick Eastes. ------------ Rick Eastes. ------------

When I compile my application using VC++ 6.0, my app requres MFC42.DLL while if compiled with VC++.net, is requires MFC70.DLL Is there a way to compile using .net AND forcing it to link to MFC42.DLL and not MFC70.DLL ??? PLEASE help. Rick Eastes. ------------

I am looking for somewhere to stay in or near london. I'm from brisbane, Australia and am willing to have someone stay here if they'd like to. (Your website idea is great! I've been thinking of doing something like that myself) Rick Eastes. ------------