But according to sequential Evaluation: say If, a=(b+=2,5,2) then it will evaluate b+=2 but a will get the value 2, as I m using the braces here. So i think in my question it is evaluating the a+=3 but finally it is resulting the value of last argument. a += ( a+= 3, 5, a ); //a=1 a += ( a );//a=4 kindly correct me know if I m wrong.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
Hi, what would be the output of following code: main() { int a=1; printf ("%d", a+=(a+=3,5,a)); } In VC++ it is showing output: 8 In AS/400’s C showing output: 5 If it is complier dependent, plz tell me the logic of both the answers.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
modified on Monday, June 8, 2009 6:08 AM
ok, i am not making you understand... ..once more... i am connecting server remotely. and running a long duration application on it...now from my local pc, if i don't highlight or run any hardware interrupt on that remote pc, session get disabled. so i want to run such a script, so that..i can highlight that remote PC window after every 1 minute....
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
actually it needs some hardware interrupt. if i click any where on remote EM screen or higlight the remote EM window , it remains active session otherwise connection gets lost. can i do like this, just to highlight that window, by command prompt coding.. etc
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
Could you plz elaborate it more??:confused:
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
hi, i am connecting the server PC. and running some long duration application. but it get disconnect if PC is idle for more than 2 minutes. i have to write some script so that mouse get click after every 1 minute. waiting for any suggestion, help or any example. Thanks
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
In which database u want to run this??? following is for MS-Access ----------------------------- SELECT [studentName], [Division] FROM tblstudent LEFT JOIN tblMarks ON [tblstudent].[studentID]=[tblMarks].[studentID];
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
If you are using win32 API, then - You can use CreateFont. Be sure the handle returned by CreateFont ( which you will use for the WM_SETFONT message ) is valid throughout the lifetime of the button window. If you want to make the font normal for all texts, then following may be helpful-
HFONT hFont = (HFONT)GetStockObject(DEFAULT_GUI_FONT);
SendMessage(hwnd, WM_SETFONT, (WPARAM)hFont, MAKELPARAM(TRUE, 0));
It may be helpful, but not sure...... :-D
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
SELECT * FROM table1 FULL OUTER JOIN table2 ON table1.name = table2.name
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
Refer these links. I hope these will be sufficient. http://bytes.com/forum/thread212617.html[^] http://forums.sureshkumar.net/data-structures-c-c-vc/38-diff-between-macro-c-nstant.html[^] :)
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
declare a myCharPtr which doesn't have any embedded nulls and be sure that it is large enough. And use following command- strcpy(myCharPtr, my_string.c_str()) I think it should work...but not sure.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
Oh definetly !!!! it is being always a puzzled question for me. I would like to suggest that please provide every NF by taking a single example in step by step manner.Most of the people give example but they are on different data,so don't teach their need.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
There are no unsigned integers in SQL Server, except for tinyint. So for bigger values define a INT or BIGINT data type ( as per your database demand ) and add a check contraint to accept only positive values. Like the below example. create table x_table(i int, j_Pos_value int constraint chk_j _cons Check (j_Pos_value>=0)) :-O
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
There are 5 type of integrity constraints NOT NULL, UNIQUE KEY, PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY and CHECK. I think you aplied anyone of them in your table schema and voilating that. If a user tries to insert data that doesn't meet these requirements, Oracle will not allow so. :)
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"
Yes, all records of database are traversed.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them"