Paul Watson wrote:
Maybe I should write an article on this someday.
Please do. :cool:
Paul Watson wrote:
layering of state on a stateless protocol
Misguided at best. :rolleyes:
Paul Watson wrote:
the heavyweight viewstate
Not good. X|
Paul Watson wrote:
the bad habits it encourages,
Reminds me of the WYSWYG guys that swear that they can knock out a web site in minutes. :rolleyes: Unfortunately it only takes minutes for me to find something wrong with usability or cross browser compatibility. X| I also like to watch the look on their faces when I run it through the W3C verifier and the big red banner announces that there are problems with the layout. :wtf:
Paul Watson wrote:
the layers placed between you and the text layer, the reliance on components which are great for intranets but pants for the public web
Does that mean viewable on a particular browser but only after you download the 50Kg of crap system architecture into a 30Kg system. :rolleyes:
Paul Watson wrote:
much more
Enough said. :suss: You have confirmed my suspicions but it is nice to hear it from an independent source. :sigh: I am usually viewed as being closed minded by the fan boys because I like to take a minimalist approach -- simplest rendition, without unnecessary bells and whistles. :rolleyes:
Paul Watson wrote:
It is a nice tool for hacking together websites that work like desktop apps. But it is overly complicated for what it tries to do and gets in the way of devs who know what they are doing in web-dev.
Good reason to stay away. X| Thank you for the reply. :cool:
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes
