A shot in the dark here but maybe something else overwrites your arrays with null data

Again, for the confused among us, this forum is a technical one. NOT a medical one. There are dedicated forums online for the discussion on subjects like fashion, sports, travel or health concerns and anxieties. There is also professional support for those who feel they need it only a google away. On this forum we discuss subjects exclusively on computer science/computer engineering. Read the policy again just as you would read the documentation of an API and find the bug in your thought process if you feel opposed to the above. Admins/Moderators please take action. There are users here who shall not allow the decades-long quality of this forum to be compromised.

This is a technical forum. Not a medical one. It violates the forum rules. Has been reported accordingly. Admins please take action.

Yes, I cannot agree with you more. I have already finished it twice on PC. Sincerely, I did not encounter a single bug (version 1.2). I have been dreaming of a game like this since like forever. I too cannot understand the negative comments and reviews. It is certainly my favorite game along with System Shock. I consider it a marvelous piece of engineering!

A series of articles would indeed be more appropriate. Thanks again.

Yes I actually have and this is actually the plan. There is a lot of ground to be covered, from engine initialisation to scene and materials setup. It will be quite a long article but it is definitely necessary. So thanks for the advise and please stay tuned!

Hahaha, it's a deal. Saved a spot for you. :-D

Have a look at NthDimension Github repo for my C# OpenGL 3.0 deferred rendering framework. The codebase has grown quite a lot. It could use a few contributors.

Yes you do! That is correct. It is this very tone that I would love to see eliminated in a place where highly-intellectual people exchange views. And yes, I owe to the rest of the community an apology. So I am sincerely sorry, but I'm fed up with shallow and rushed sterile judgement.

I cannot agree more with you. Indeed one needs to be extremely careful with judgement especially for such ground-breaking news.

No, wrong is the assumption that the model is another statistical tool and non-confrontational to the standard model. While in fact it is fundamentally a whole new theory that if proven correct (by what you correctly describe as validation) will replace the Standard Model.

Quote:

It's not a confrontational system; it's just a new set of statistical analyses, based on new-ish assumptions.

I am sorry you cannot follow my train of thought. Please note that my responses to you are simply in the spirit of your own reply.

You are most welcome. As for gravity have patience. One step at a time. What really strikes me is the new perspective that the bizzare quanta are simply neutrinos in elliptical motion near the speed of light! Could this new knowledge lead to new room-temperature superconducting materials?

Quote:

It's not a confrontational system; it's just a new set of statistical analyses, based on new-ish assumptions. The fact that even the Hamiltonians are calculated to within 1% of empirical observations is impressive enough for a lot of people to take notice and try it out for themselves, using variants of the system it's been tried with.

That is simply wrong. What the model proposes eliminates the weak and strong forces as it describes them to be a result of lepton rotation with angular velocity near the speed of light. The gravity measured is described in Special Relativity. Finally, instead of 15 fundamental particles described by the Standard Model, this model proposes only five.

Well, it's thermodynamic systems modelling and satellite trajectories I've been programming for the last 20 years so I guess to me it figures. A little piece of mind if anyone cares for my two cents. If we only criticize based on speculation and not in-depth knowledge ie failing to provide constructive grounds for conversation, then we fall in a dark infinite loop of self-admiration. Everybody has an opinion nowadays I'm afraid. The science and engineering discipline we have chosen, since we are here on CP, should have taught us by itterations of education or training that progress and achievement is a life-time process. I'd rather be more humble when dealing with things I don't quite understand yet and then be even more humble when I have mastered them and I have to express my opinion in public.

Well, it's thermodynamic systems modelling and satellite trajectories I've been programming for the last 20 years so I guess to me it figures.

The Rotating Lepton Model vs the Standard Model -Only two fundamental forces: gravity and electromagnetism -Only 5 fundamental particles: 3 neutrinos, positron, electron -No additional/assumptional/adjustable variables https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119320515

[

Testable theory suggests information has mass and could account for universe’s dark matter

](https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5126530)[^]

Intel’s neuro guru slams deep learning: ‘it’s not actually learning’ | ZDNet[^]

Congratulations and welcome to the club! Maybe you don't want to write an article during your honeymoon. You may discover that Mrs has another, unknown face now she is married... :rolleyes:

:laugh: The most common in the universe!