Member 14751866 wrote:

"This message has been flagged as potential spam and is awaiting moderation"

Everyone with a low-ish post count gets that message. Stop being paranoid, and stop spreading misinformation.

Member 14751866 wrote:

I am safer to be close to than any who has had the experimental treatment.

Based on what metrics? Which experts tested you?

Member 14751866 wrote:

Too many people harmed by the Pharmaceutical Industry

Disparaging the "pharmaceutical industry" (capitalized even), yet..

Member 14751866 wrote:

I use Ivermectin [...] consider learning about Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine

Who do you think makes these two drugs you're pushing?

Member 14751866 wrote:

Some day when and if you experience chronic illness like arthritis, Chromes disease, inflammatory driven complexes etc. I hope you remember this episode in your life and that the so called vaccine could be the cause.

Or it was that time I was near a microwave, or ate a banana, or went to the beach and/or ate that bad shellfish, or inhaled some asbestos, etc. Know why? Because these are INCREDIBLY CCOMMON ailments that have existed long before COVID.

Cool. Good luck! :)

Our Watchguard routers have decided your current IP (76.74.234.210) belongs to a Botnet and is blocking it. It decides thins based on a list it pulls from someplace. I just whitelisted the IP for my use, but figured I'd mention it.

There's a not-so-fine line between "discussing politics" and "hating on another country". There's no politics being discussed here.

Member 4673202 wrote:

- I will not talk about which Win version is better or why Win8 sucks or whatever about the OS versions. ... Win8 has been painful with those side menus, for sure they are good in a cellphone but each time I slice my finger from right to left I got that contextual menu!!!

Well you managed to make it one whole post before you veered from your own rules. :/

The good news is it makes more sense in my brain then in my typing. :) I guess the Shame is on me in this case. ;) Regardless, CP kicks butt at teaching once again, thanks! :)

Ahhh OK.... So because they are assigning it to an OnClick event, then it needs to be a function instead of just a simple Boolean, and they're trying to have the click do 'nothing', but do this to avoid having the #, instead of just assigning the OnClick to null, or removing the OnClick attribute completely? Weird... But good to know for sure... Better I learn this trick, than lose faith in the darned supplier I guess. ;)

OK, Let me preface this by saying, I'm NOT a professional programmer. So I may be way off base and just lacking the knowledge as to why this may NOT be a piece of Shame. If there is a reason to do this, I'd love to know it.. :) Anyhow... Found this in some JavaScript in a vendor's product we pay plenty of money into monthly:

function ReturnFalse()
{
return false;
}

The only place I can find it used it in a couple statements like this:

if (button.onclick != ReturnFalse) {...

and

button.onclick = ReturnFalse;

Am I nuts or are they? :)