Yes, this allows me to change the tag. But I dont want it changed. I want it completely removed.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Yes, this allows me to change the tag. But I dont want it changed. I want it completely removed.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
I am creating a custom WebControl. I noticed that it wraps everything in a SPAN tag. How can I get rid of this tag? I don’t want it to appear!
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Yes, using class selectors is one of the solutions I have already thought. There are cases though when you actually need to use ID selectors. Not many but there are some... :) How about the dynamic CSS emition? Could you please point me to more info about this technique? Thanking you in advance.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
I am facing a bit of a problem with the IDs generated by the framework for HTML elements that exist within a user control or a web control that is added to the page dynamically. The framework goes and creates some kind of hierarchy and adds prefixes to the IDs. My question is how do you guys manage these when you want to create a unique CSS declaration for a specific element? For example, if I have a user control that generates a contact form, and I want to give to a textbox that exists within that contact form a unique style.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
because i need the viewstate. was just wondering why it is wrapped within a DIV.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
To be honest I have to serious reason. I just like being in full control of what markup is delivered to the site visitor and little things like this one just annoy me.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
I noticed that the framework wraps the viewstate hidden input element into a DIV element. Can anyone explain why it is done this way and how and if I can get rid of the div? Can I place the viewstate hidden input at the bottom of the page? Thanking you in advance.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Dear CPians, I have been working with the Xml.Serialization namespace in order to serialize C# objects to Xml. In some of my Classes I have long string members that I need to enclose within CDATA sections when serialized. I have been struggling to find a way to do this. Any ideas? Thanking you in advance.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Actually a redirect would do it. thanx
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Dear CPians, I am using the Page.IsPostBack
property. When this evaluates to true, hence I am within a post back, I want, in some cases to cancel the post back. I need to prevent it of happening in case some condition evaluates to true. Example:
if (Page.IsPostBack)
{
if (something == true)
{
DO SOMETHING TO CANCEL THE POSTBACK
}
}
Is there a way to prevent it of happening? Thanking you in advance
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Actually I am wrong... :doh::doh::doh: forgot to mention XML! You need to understand XML as well! .... and forget about magnetic flux!:laugh:
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Bradml wrote:
You are talking about Ajax-like development.
Yes I said that AJAX is not JavaScript. Coz strictly speaking, its a combination of JavaScript and XML, regardless how the XML is generated and then served to the client.
Bradml wrote:
If you wrote it in VB script then it would be close to the javascript version (well as close as VBscript gets anyway) but it would not be Ajax.
I so totally agree. I said that you could achieve the same thing by using another client side scripting language.
Bradml wrote:
And also web developers were using Ajax techniques a fair while before google was releasing beta versions of their products, they just made it semi-famous with end users and non web developers.
And I also said that developers used AJAX-like techniques since the early stages of web and that Google used proper AJAX in google maps and created a buzz around it and became popular.
Bradml wrote:
No
So your "NO" is the answer to what?
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
:laugh: we all do, have a nice weekend!
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
:laugh: Ok, you might need to understand what magnetic flux is aswell. :doh: hehe but really, am I wrong?
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
I have to say that AJAX is not JavaScript. AJAX can be achieved with the use of a client side scripting language, HMTL and DOM manipulation and some server side thingies... AJAX stand for asynchronoous javascript and xml. but still, you could achieve the same things with VB Script on the client (would only work in IE). AJAX-like techniques exist since the very early stages of the web. Those days we used hidden frames to get the same effect. As a concept it is very old. It got trendy nowadays coz Google used it on google maps and created a buzz around it.
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
You need to understand HTML and CSS first. Then understand the concepts of DOM. Then learn JavaScript. Then have a look at prototype (it will help you alot). Understand some server side language. ASP, ASP.NET, PHP, JSP... Understand HTTP and the 2 main request types. Then think of some useful way of putting all of them together... Apply them, and... ...da daaa!!!! you have AJAX!
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Because, ON UPDATE i need to do several different things on the table. some are logging things. some are denormalization for performance. some are maintenance issues... but I need then in certain order. I know, i stick them all in one trigger... But still, I was wondering if it could be done in 3 triggers
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle
Suppose I have 3 or 4 triggers on a table for UPDATE. Is there a way to control the execution order of them?
Excellence is not an act, but a habit!
Aristotle