This code will help you please try: if (empty($_POST['username'])) { emptyField(); } Regards, David Kroj Website Development Company | Web Development Company

You have used d instead of dt in getElementById line. Sunday = 0 "It's true that hard work never killed anyone. But I figure, why take the chance." - Ronald Reagan That's what machines are for. Got a problem? Sleep on it.

you must use setinterval...

Thanks guys...With you hints and tips I have figured it out. Part of the solution (the code any) came from this site: msdn library Once again thanks... :) :) :)

OK Deal :cool: thatraja |Chennai|India| Brainbench certifications Down-votes are like kid's kisses don't reject it :-) Do what you want quickly because the Doomsday on 2012 :-)

Cheers will do As barmey as a sack of badgers Dude, if I knew what I was doing in life, I'd be rich, retired, dating a supermodel and laughing at the rest of you from the sidelines.

As defined that method can not be unit tested as it requires user input (to select the file). But as you want an example on how to test a method that doesn't return a value it can be refactored slightly as below. To test a method that returns void you test for the change in system state that the method call is meant to impose. In this case the listbox should contain 2 items after the call, granted testing if items were added to a listbox is of dubious benefit but this is just for illustrative purposes. private void BtnLoad_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { //Declare a new file dialog box OpenFileDialog dlg = new OpenFileDialog(); //Set properties for the dialog... dlg.Title = "Select one or more media files"; dlg.Multiselect = IsEnabled; dlg.Filter = "Media files(\*.mp3;\*.wav;\*.wma;\*.avi;\*.mp4;\*.mpg;\*.wmv)|\*.mp3;\*.wav;\*.wma;\*.avi;\*.mp4;\*.mpg;\*.wmv|All files(\*.\*)|\*.\*"; //The result of the open file dialog is either true or false (didn't work). Nullable<bool> result = dlg.ShowDialog(); //If the result of the open file dialog was true then.... if (result == true) { LoadFilesToListbox(dlg.FileNames); } } public void LoadFilesToListbox(string[] files) { //Add each file into the list box foreach (string file in files) { lstBxList.Items.Add(file); } } [TestMethod] public void TestLoadFilesToListbox() { LoadFilesToListbox(new string[] { "file1.txt", file2.dat" }); Assert.AreEqual(2, lstBxList.Items.Count); }

You need to call BeginReceive() in your OnDataReceived() method. You do that to reset it. You will need to also consider if you don't want to do that, such as when the app is exiting.

i did it to practice wpf, but wouldn't use it in real life though. V.

Several things could be wrong here, however I can't tell which one(s) it will be as you have shown only a fraction of the relevant code. Here are the main possibilities: 1. you may be invoking a receive with a small buffer; if you were to ask for one byte, then you would only get one byte. 2. you might have an encoding mismatch between sender and receiver. e.g. if the sender uses Unicode, regular characters would look like real (ANSI) bytes and NULLs intertwined; an 8-bit encoder would react badly on the NULLs. 3. what EndReceive returns is the number of bytes, not characters, hence char[] chars = new char[iRx]; is wrong. IMO you should use [EDIT] Encoding.GetString() right away to convert bytes into a string.[/EDIT] :) Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability. modified on Friday, October 22, 2010 10:04 PM

:laugh: Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

After alot of hair pulling and banging my head on the wall, finally figured out why by code isn't working. First of all, there are 4 serial ports available on my PC. The fact that I am trying to use the same serial port to test my Windows mobile application and send data over the same serial port explains why. So one would then suggest trying to use another port, well there is two problems with this; first active sync lunches and takes this spare serial port(have tried killing the process, this didn't help), Secondly also discovered that my Windows mobile device only supports on connection at a time so hence while I am testing it I can not open another port, which really sucks... So now I am diching using bluetooth all together and am using WiFi. I know what your thinking (won't I run into the same problems as with bluetooth), well with WiFi I am going to create a dummy application (desktop) that will sent strings, if this works I will then rebuild it as a Windows Mobile application, hopefully it should work...Thanks for the help everyone...

It (this) always refers to the current instances of classes. This function is used in access members of Constructors,instance methods and instance accessors Qualify Member hidden by similar names and to pass objects as a parameter to other methods this keyword is commonly used. To get more details click on the given link Java Tutorial: this Keyword[^]

You can set an event handler for the Completed event on your mediaElement. When that event is fired, load the next file and play it. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

You might want to ask this question in the WPF forum or in Quick Answers (but not both... cross-posting is frowned upon here). My guess, however, is that there is an event for when the video stops playing. Hook up to that event and detect if the video played back fully (i.e., that the user didn't manually stop it) using the Position.TotalSeconds property (if that's a real property). If you can't find any sort of event like that (though I'm sure one must exist), then I'd say just keep polling in a loop or on a timer to see if the TotalSeconds has been reached yet and then play the next item. You could also create a timer that assumes the video plays instantly and waits for the total duration of the video, then starts the next video and repeats that process until it reaches the last video. [Forum Guidelines]

OriginalGriff wrote: It'll be a pipe and carpet slippers next Now you've lost me, you really need to start formulating more clearly. :laugh: Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

yes, that looks better, except that you are still not using PRE tags to show a code snippet. :(( Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

Stefan63 wrote: has it ever been 'en vogue'? Possibly not, but it was certainly common practice at my last company, which had a fairly large group of developers around the world. I've never actually tried to see if it's in any of the published books on C++ (or C). It's time for a new signature.