okay I typed it in a hurry. let me explain it again? What I asked for was, "The fear of finding something existing". something existing means- it's old. It exists already. But the phobias that you mentioned are all about trying something new that doesn't exist? Trying to change from existing ones. Did this confuse you more? hehe :D
tinydevs
but the meaning is exactly the opposite. What I'm referring is about finding something *old*. If it exists already, it existed already :D So wrong guess! Let's find a new word :)
tinydevs
Centophobia Close to CentosPhobia. People'd think you don't like Linux.
tinydevs
A bit of I/O overload! may be i & O
tinydevs
I have a phobia to spell long words. :rolleyes:
tinydevs
Yeah truly! Even this applies when you try for any account name online. I had that when I couldn't get a gmail account on my real name! :(
tinydevs
I wish to coin a new word to mean the panic that gets developed when you come to know, through Google that an idea that you thought as unique, worked out for so long, exists already. What's your suggestion? 1. itexistophobia 2. Googleophobia 3. patentedophobia 4. 5.
tinydevs
Thanks for links Bassam, The tools look great. But my current requirement is to simulate Metro-UI type of GUIs for an application. Like a Proto tool that lets us animate the screens similar to Windows 8 & Windows Phone Apps UIs. And it should be presented as a video. (please check the video link in my original post).
tinydevs
Thanks for links. I'll give them a try :thumbsup:
tinydevs
Thanks Joan! I think PowerPoint is close enough for the purpose. I've done few videos using Power Point this before. It took some effort but did its job neatly at the end.
tinydevs
You are also called Korimon? To answer you, I think it's a waste of time. :)
tinydevs
People who complain the images don't work - they have a "/working" sub directory inserted in the image URL path. People who don't complain with images, don't have this "/working" path. You make this 
in the editor, But after publishing , it becomes 
But this /working do not make harm when you make a "Preview" from your account. I'm not sure if this is the exact bug, Could someone confirm this issue and give me some bonus points? :rolleyes: If no bonus points for this, just fix it for my article as well: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=91628&aid=647083[^] :) I'll wait!
http://www.infoworld.com/print/225817[^] Most initiatives actually do not fail, they adopt to the wild changes of this dynamic tech world, which runs like the storms in Jupiter. In the process they simply morph into a different , better shapes. The far the companies could foresee the changes, the more gradual , stable & graceful the morph would be. That has happened to all the VB programmers now. I used to develop for C++/VB then morphed into C# desktop developer, now into the devices using C#-XAML. And if Microsoft could foresee things better, they would have titled all their product lines towards the cloud and web in a more graceful way. Not just MS it's a phase to go through for all the companies. If we have to say things were a failure, I must start from GWBASIC , PASCAL, Applets, Flash etc Man everything has it own time! "Andrew Oliver" failed.
Intel calender[^] The "Phase 1 Closed" thing got me scared.
App is a short form for Apple Program.
We'll of course I've contributed to Bank safe's designs. But we don't talk to the managers straight. Did that kill the joke?
Yes I know it's the rating for the Article. Or anybody using CP would know this fact. But anybody searching for the Samsung Series 7 notebook, landing here would only think the rating is for the hardware they can't think it's for the Article. Because that's how the eyes are trained to read a hardware review. If these reviews are only for the CP users, I agree this do not mislead.
Thanks for the link. I see there are places to accommodate my writings in pipeline. In a related note, Samsung Series 7 Chronos Notebook Review[^] The ratings starts there are a bit misleading. Anybody seeing it would think the rating is given to the hardware and not to the article.
The background music is so DUMB! It feels like they are just moving it from the kitchen cellar to the living room (without a roof). But the background music tries to project as if they are getting released into the King Kong island.