So, in Cockney a computer becomes a French Tutor. Amazing ^^ [Flags] public enum Bool { True, False, ForSure, Maybe, ProbablyNot, Depends, NotDecidedYet, Undefined } private interface IStealth { }

Was that meant to be English?

Sorry. WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

Marc Clifton wrote: Thanks for the repost, the one 4 hours ago has scrolled way off my screen and I wouldn't have seen it. no! you must read every message on every thread! it's right there in the ToS. image processing toolkits | batch image processing

Sorry Tom. :doh:

Seems to be OK now. -NP Never underestimate the creativity of the end-user.

brilliant. :thumbsup: "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011) "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)

No problem. Pretty serious stuff. WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

Dang! WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

Not bad, but tomorrow I'm making sausage stuffed jalapenos to munch during the Bowl. Brown the sausage, blend with cream cheese, sprinkle with parmesan cheese, and grill. Of course, that won't be quite enough, so I'm also baking a pastry stuffed with canadian bacon (overpriced ham), pineapple, onions, and gruyere cheese on the barbie. Shrimp cocktails are on the menu, as well, along with the usual chips and dip. That's just for the Puppy Bowl; I haven't decided on the menu for the Super Bowl yet. ;P Will Rogers never met me.

Dean Oliver wrote: The whole point of MVVM is not to have code in your code behind. That's not quite true. The idea in MVVM is not to have code that knows about the model in the code behind of the view. If you want to have code that handles something like a window resize, for instance (it's just an example, and yes you could perfectly easily accomplish this with attached behaviors), it's perfectly acceptable to have this in the code-behind; as long as it doesn't have any model knowledge. *pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

Glad I could help :) Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

Not really... :^) http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4126589/UserControl-as-a-TabItem.aspx[^] WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

Ha! I never thought of that. Of course! It all makes sense now... :) WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

interesting - we have turkey recipes? We don't even have a tradition for turkeys (at least for the animal ones... ;P ). regards Torsten I never finish anyth...

Tom Delany wrote: My father passed away on the date that you sent this to me and I had to leave town suddenly. My sympathies - not a good time. :rose: Tom Delany wrote: If I construct the view models properly (and that's a big if), yes - that's the problem I faced many times! I actually split my ViewModel and ViewData into separate classes - as I find this makes more sense (to me, anyway!) so my model really models the functionality to be presented, and the data is just the data that allows that functionality to occur. It allowed me more flexiblity to do what I wanted to do but it may not suit you! Cheers MVVM# - See how I did MVVM my way ___________________________________________ Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011 .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

Doh! :doh: I did not notice that. I was pulling what little hair I have left out trying to figure it out. :-O What a moron I am... :doh: Thanks Chris. WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who know binary and people who don't.

Ohhhhhhh! Now I see! Sorry - although i'm a big SF fan, Battlestar gallactica just plain sucks balls in my book. Though after following your link I may be more inclined to watch a few eps! MVVM# - See how I did MVVM my way ___________________________________________ Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011 .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

BillWoodruff wrote: saying that you felt irritated reading my post Was my irritation not aparent? If not, then clearly I should have used stronger language. :) ============================== Nothing to say.

I purchased Reflector and it crashed on me so many times in the first day that I was livid at being conned. I complained and in 24hrs I'd been given a full refund. I then latched onto ILSpy. For sure, it's not perfect and it has a way to go before it becomes a great freeware product but it's on its way and that's a good sign. I don't know why Reflector turned crap. It started at the top and worked it's way downwards under RG's ownership. I'm sure Herr Roeder probably did well out of it so maybe RG have to recover their investment but to be honest it's dropped so low now that it seems to prove the old adage, namely, you can't polish a turd. The best thing they can do is put it out for public consumption. All this talk of giving away a reduced functionality version is crap. Perhaps RG make enough money elsewhere so why they chose to screw us is unfortunate. I'll never buy another RG product and frankly, the bitter taste from having bought once will last a long time in my mouth and longer still in my wallet. I hope ILSpy can maintain enough momentum to raise itself above Reflector.